Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mancuso, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mizio, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mancuso, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mizio, G.
(Chest. 1988;93:144-148.)
© 1988 American College of Chest Physicians

Echocardiographic Recognition of Mediastinal Masses

Luigi Mancuso M.D.1; Francesco Pitrolo M.D.1; Francesco Bondì M.D.1; Maria Aurora Iacona M.D.1; Silvana Magrin M.D.1; Salvatore Marchi M.D.1; and Gisella Mizio M.D.1

1 From the Division of Cardiology, Ospedale V. Cervello, Palermo, Italy

The aim of our study was to assess the ability of echocardiography to recognize mediastinal masses. We studied 50 patients: 25 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, nine with lymphomas, four with pleural effusion and previously known neoplastic diseases, ten with nonlymphomatous mediastinal masses, and two with compression of the superior vena cava. In 33 of 50 patients, computed tomography (CT) showed mediastinal masses, and in one, an aneurysm of the thoracic descending aorta. All patients had previously had chest x-ray and two-dimensional echocardiographic (2-DE) examinations in order to recognize the presence of masses. Two-DE was found to have similar specificity (94.1 percent) but higher sensitivity (90.9 percent vs 60.6 percent) if related to radiographic examination. The positive predictive value was 96.7 vs 95.2 percent and the negative predictive value was 84.2 percent vs 55.1 percent. In particular, 2-DE was more useful than chest x-ray examination when a concomitant pleural or pericardial effusion was present. Moreover, abnormalities of cardiac function due to compression or infiltration and the follow-up of patients were better evaluated.

Submitted on March 6, 2007
Accepted on July 16, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Chest Physicians.