Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Withers, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Crockett, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Withers, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Crockett, A.
(Chest. 1988;93:91-97.)
© 1988 American College of Chest Physicians

Lung Volume Standards for Healthy Male Lifetime Nonsmokers

R. T. Withers Ph.D., M.Sc.1; P. C. Bourdon M.A.1; and A. Crockett R.P.T.1

1 From the Exercise Physiology Laboratory, School of Education, The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia

Functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV), vital capacity (VC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were measured in 162 men aged 18.9 to 78.6 years using a multiple breath helium dilution technique. Multiple regression equations were generated to predict these lung parameters from the best weighted combination (ple0.05) of age, mass, standing height, body surface area, sitting height, biacromial breadth, end-tidal chest girth, expanded chest girth, and chest expansion (FRC: R=.748, SEE= 504 ml; RV: R=.725, SEE=301 ml; VC: R=.808, SEE=537 ml; TLC: R=.808, SEE=551 ml; RV/TLC: R=.778, SEE=4.15 percent). The range of normality was defined as the predicted value±the 95 percent confidence interval (two-tailed test). Cross-validation of other FRC, RV, VC, and TLC equations in the literature indicated that they were unsuitable for use with our data.

Submitted on November 12, 2007
Accepted on May 18, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Chest Physicians.