Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rockoff, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rockoff, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A

Chest, Vol 93, 1088-1091, Copyright © 1988 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Roentgenographic underestimation of early asbestosis by International Labor Organization classification. Analysis of data and probabilities

SD Rockoff and A Schwartz
Department of Radiology, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037.

We analyzed the limitations of the International Labor Organization (ILO) classification of chest roentgenograms in predicting the presence of histologically determined early asbestosis. The ILO system is arbitrary, without histologic correlates, and does not consider the asbestos exposure history or clinical and laboratory information. We present data from the literature and our own work which demonstrate that the application of the ILO classification to an asbestos-exposed individual can result in a 10 to 20 percent probability of a "normal" roentgenographic interpretation in the presence of significant asbestosis at the histologic level, leading to an inappropriate conclusion regarding the presence of asbestosis. In view of the data and statistical analysis presented, we suggest that sole reliance upon the ILO classified chest roentgenogram for determination of the presence of early pulmonary asbestosis in individual cases is inappropriate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Ohar, D. A. Sterling, E. Bleecker, and J. Donohue
Changing Patterns in Asbestos-Induced Lung Disease
Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 744 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A Oikonomou and N L Muller
Imaging of pneumoconiosis
Imaging, March 1, 2003; 15(1): 11 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Chest Physicians.