Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viegi, G
Right arrow Articles by Giuntini, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Viegi, G
Right arrow Articles by Giuntini, C

Chest, Vol 93, 1213-1220, Copyright © 1988 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Single breath nitrogen test in an epidemiologic survey in North Italy. Reliability, reference values and relationships with symptoms

G Viegi, P Paoletti, F Di Pede, R Prediletto, L Carrozzi, G Pistelli and C Giuntini
CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, University of Pisa, Italy.

The usefulness of single breath nitrogen test (SBN2) was evaluated in a cross-sectional epidemiologic survey on a general population sample (n = 3,289) of North Italy. Each subject was submitted to CNR standardized questionnaire and to lung function testing using automated equipment (Hewlett-Packard 47804S). Acceptable closing volume (CV) and slope of alveolar plateau (DN2%/L) tracings were performed by only 1,370 and 1,982 subjects respectively, in comparison with the 2,638 diffusing capacity and the 3,079 forced vital capacity acceptable maneuvers. Prediction equations were computed on normal subjects for CV indices, with the exception of DN2%/L: they were similar to those found in other studies. Significant differences among smoking categories were found for all the SBN2 parameters in males, but only for DN2%/L in females. The latter was also able to distinguish either subjects with airway obstruction from those without it or symptomatic from asymptomatic individuals, but DN2%/L did not give more information than Vmax75, a sensitive index of flow volume curve. Our results suggest that the place of SBN2 in large scale epidemiologic testing has not been justified.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Chest Physicians.