|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
Chest, Vol 94, 376-379, Copyright © 1988 by American College of Chest Physicians
ARTICLES |
EE Wack, NM Ampel, JN Galgiani and DA Bronnimann
Medical Service, Veterans Administrations Medical Center, Tucson 85723.
Previous studies have suggested that coccidioidomycosis during pregnancy is a devastating illness associated with high maternal mortality. However, this concept recently has been challenged. We examined the incidence of coccidioidomycosis during pregnancy in Tucson, Arizona, an area endemic for this infection. After reviewing the records of three separate health care facilities, we found ten cases of coccidioidomycosis among 47,120 pregnancies. Nine of the ten women had no underlying disease. Seven were diagnosed with coccidioidomycosis during either the first or second trimester. Illness resolved in all seven. Three other patients were diagnosed during the first ten days postpartum. While infection was self-limited in one woman, two others developed severe disseminated coccidioidomycosis associated with meningitis. Despite this, there were no maternal deaths. Of eight deliveries, all were uncomplicated and produced healthy infants. In summary, diagnosing coccidioidomycosis during pregnancy is rare. Although we observed no maternal death, our experience suggests that women who develop coccidioidomycosis late in pregnancy are at risk for developing severe disseminated infection.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Cox and D. M. Magee Coccidioidomycosis: Host Response and Vaccine Development Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2004; 17(4): 804 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W S Lim, J T Macfarlane, and C L Colthorpe Respiratory diseases in pregnancy {bullet} 2: Pneumonia and pregnancy Thorax, May 1, 2001; 56(5): 398 - 405. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. CALDWELL, E. L. ARSURA, W. B. KILGORE, A. L. GARCIA, V. REDDY, and R. H. JOHNSON Coccidioidomycosis in Pregnancy During an Epidemic in California Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2000; 95(2): 236 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |