Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scott, W.

Chest, Vol 94, 1221-1224, Copyright © 1988 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Complications associated with central venous catheters. A survey

WL Scott
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD.

The Federal Food and Drug Administration has a system for reporting problems with medical devices that requires manufacturers of medical devices to report medical complications or equipment malfunction that causes, or could cause, death or serious injury. In a two-year period, central venous catheters were associated with 170 complications: tissue perforation, loss of catheter integrity, (including: catheter separation, severance, break, rip, puncture, or leak), and other problems. Causes of the complications were related to device failure (12 percent), health care professionals (55 percent), patients (3 percent), or pathologic or physiologic aspects (3 percent); causes of 28 percent of the complications were indeterminable. Further analysis indicated that complications (especially tissue perforation) were primarily health professional technique-related. There were no reports of complications related to infection. Data support the need for more education in catheter application and the need to modify the system by which these data are reported to more reliably detect infection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Unnikrishnan, N. Idris, and N. Varshneya
Complete heart block during central venous catheter placement in a patient with pre-existing left bundle branch block
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 747 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. MAURY, J. GUGLIELMINOTTI, M. ALZIEU, B. GUIDET, and G. OFFENSTADT
Ultrasonic Examination . An Alternative to Chest Radiography after Central Venous Catheter Insertion?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2001; 164(3): 403 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Chest Physicians.