Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bencowitz, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Bencowitz, H.

Chest, Vol 95, 117-123, Copyright © 1989 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Differences in plethysmographic lung volumes. Effects of linked vs unlinked spirometry

JH Williams Jr and HZ Bencowitz
Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.

Determination of absolute lung volumes in patients is most reliable when measured with body plethysmography. Many laboratories use data obtained with a spirometer not directly linked to the plethysmograph to calculate total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV) from thoracic gas volume (Vtg) measured at functional residual capacity (FRC) in the plethysmograph. The reliability of these calculations depends on the stability of FRC between these separate devices. We examined the differences in TLC and RV values calculated with linked and unlinked spirometers in 220 patients and found them statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Additionally, differences exceeding the 95 percent confidence intervals for repeated, linked determinations occurred in more than 5 percent of patients. The large-volume differences in TLC were often associated with differences in expiratory reserve volume (ERV) in the opposite direction, suggesting a shift in FRC. However, clinical diagnoses were infrequently (4/220) altered by these differences, and recognition of the shift in FRC should further reduce this error. Therefore, the unlinked method appears acceptable.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.