Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.

Chest, Vol 95, 52-55, Copyright © 1989 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The discriminatory value of the P(A-a)O2 during exercise in the detection of asbestosis in asbestos exposed workers

DD Smith and PG Agostoni
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Asbestosis is commonly associated with abnormalities of gas transport but since most asbestos workers are smokers and smokers also commonly have abnormalities in P(A-a)O2, the actual specificity and sensitivity of the P(A-a)O2 has been unknown. The P(A-a)O2 was measured at rest and exercise in 92 asbestos-exposed patients. These patients were divided into five groups based on their x-ray and pulmonary function status; normal, CAO, CAO and pleural disease, pleural disease alone and asbestosis with or without CAO. The P(A-a)O2/VO2(mm Hg)/L of O2 was the most discriminatory measurement of gas transport between groups, with mean values of 14.45 +/- 9.24 for normal, 19.04 +/- 10.52 for CAO, 16.85 +/- 8.94 for CAO and pleural disease and 34.07 +/- 21.54 for asbestosis with or without CAO. The P(A-a)O2/VO2 was of high specificity if greater than 35 mm Hg/L of O2 with only two out of 65 patients without asbestosis being considered abnormal. It was of low sensitivity in that only nine out of 27 patients with asbestosis would be detected if this were the sole criterion for diagnosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Sette, J. A. Neder, L. E. Nery, J. Kavakama, R. T. Rodrigues, M. Terra-Filho, S. Guimaraes, E. Bagatin, and N. Muller
Thin-Section CT Abnormalities and Pulmonary Gas Exchange Impairment in Workers Exposed to Asbestos
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 66 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
D D Smith, Y C G. Lee, B Singh, S C Pang, N H de Klerk, D R Hillman, and A W Musk
Earlier study on asbestos workers, ILO scores, and oxygenation more comprehensive * Authors' reply
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2003; 60(8): 611 - 611.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.