Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrix, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, G. W., 2d
Right arrow Articles by Hendrix, G. H.

Chest, Vol 95, 370-373, Copyright © 1989 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Left ventricular dysfunction in symptomatic mitral valve prolapse

GW Dorn 2d, AS Gertler, L Gordon, BW Usher and GH Hendrix
Cardiovascular Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Idiopathic MVP is characterized by a late systolic click or murmur from myxomatous mitral valvular dysfunction. It may be complicated by atypical chest pain, ventricular arrhythmias, and ECG changes that can mimic the symptoms of coronary artery disease. We prospectively performed radionuclide cineangiograms before and after stress tests in MVP patients with chest pain compared with asymptomatic MVP patients and symptomatic normal control patients. In ten patients with MVP, chest pain, and normal coronary anatomy, the LVEF remained essentially unchanged (increase of -0.5 +/- 4 percent) after exercise. In ten patients with MVP and no chest pain and in nine with normal cardiovascular system and chest pain, the exercise LVEF increased by 11.5 +/- 2 percent (p less than 0.05) and 17.4 +/- 3 percent (p less than 0.005), respectively. The resting LVEF was significantly lower (p less than 0.02) in the symptomatic MVP patients (59 +/- 3 percent) than in the asymptomatic MVP (76 +/- 5 percent) or symptomatic normal patient control subjects (70 +/- 3 percent). Patients with MVP and chest pain had a lower resting LVEF and an abnormal left ventricular functional response to exercise compared with asymptomatic MVP patients or symptomatic normal subjects. Therefore, exercise radionuclide ventriculography may not adequately differentiate between chest pain due to MVP or coronary artery disease.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.