Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R.
(Chest. 1989;95:12S-18S.)
© 1989 American College of Chest Physicians

Aspirin and Other Platelet Active Drugs

Relationship Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects

Jack Hirsh M.D., F.C.C.P.; Edwin W. Salzman M.D.; Lewrence Harker M.D.; Valentin Fuster M.D.; James E. Dalen M.D., F.C.C.P.; John A. Cairns M.D.; and Roy Collins M.D.

Thus, aspirin is an effective antithrombotic agent in doses between 100 mg/day and 1.2 g/day. There is no evidence that low doses (160-325 mg/day) are either more effective or less effective than high doses (900-1,500 mg/day). There is evidence, however, that low doses produce fewer gastric side effects. The results of biochemical studies on its mechanism of action, the dose-related side effects of aspirin, and the results of clinical studies evaluating antithrombotic effects all support the use of low doses of aspirin in the treatment of thromboembolic disorders in which the drug has been found to be effective. There is also now suggestive evidence from the UK-TIA study that aspirin is effective in patients with transient cerebral ischemia in a dose of 300 mg/day (level I), although most of the evidence for effectiveness has been obtained with higher doses (eg, approximately 1,000 mg/day).

Although a preliminary report of a study evaluating the effectiveness of aspirin (325 mg every second day) in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction suggests a beneficial effect of aspirin (level I), it would be prudent at this stage to limit the use of prophylactic aspirin to patients at high risk for coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease.

A greater benefit for aspirin has been reported in males in some studies, although this finding has not been consistent. At present, there is no convincing evidence from clinical studies that the addition of dipyridamole to aspirin improves its clinical efficacy. A critical review of the alleged antithrombotic action of dipyridamole has recently been published by Fitzgerald.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.