Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, M
Right arrow Articles by Yoshiya, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, M
Right arrow Articles by Yoshiya, I

Chest, Vol 95, 876-880, Copyright © 1989 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Jet flow-regulated expiratory resistance to maintain constant CPAP during the entire respiratory phase

M Nishimura, J Takezawa, H Imanaka, N Taenaka and I Yoshiya
Intensive Care Unit, Osaka University Hospital, Japan.

We have developed a new continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device that consists of a microcomputer, a pressure transducer, and a pair of electronic interface valves. One of these valves creates the inspiratory demand flow, and the other creates the opposing jet flow by acting as an expiratory valve to maintain a constant CPAP. By controlling the two electronic interface valves, the airway pressure can be kept constant during the entire respiratory cycle. We compared our device with CPAP systems supplied with commercially available ventilators: the Puritan-Bennett 7200a, the Bear 5, the Servo 900C, and the CV 2000. A two-chambered spring loaded model lung was used to simulate inspiration and a piston pump model lung to simulate active exhalation. We compared both the inspiratory triggering work (WWIt) and expiratory flow-resistive work (WE) of each ventilator while in CPAP mode by calculating the corresponding areas of the pressure-volume loops using electrical integration. The WWIt of our apparatus and demand-flow ventilators was much smaller than that of the CV 2000. In our device, WE was also much smaller than those of the others. These results indicate that our device can be used for CPAP without causing airway pressure fluctuation, and therefore, without imposing an extra workload on the patient.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.