Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takishima, T
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Takishima, T
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, H

Chest, Vol 96, 522-527, Copyright © 1989 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

New assessment of airway responsiveness. Effect of pretreatment with procaterol on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction

T Takishima, O Taguchi, W Hida, H Nogami, Y Shimizu and H Inoue
First Department of Internal Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

We examined airway responsiveness to allergen inhalation using a novel technique by which dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and pulmonary resistance (Rl) are simultaneously calculated by Fourier-series analysis of flow and transpulmonary pressure during tidal breathing. C0 and C0.5 (Cdyn at the frequency of zero and 0.5 Hz, respectively) were computed using the regression line of Cdyn versus frequency measured at the fundamental and first three harmonics in each breathing cycle. First, the validity of this system was tested by comparing Rl, C0 and C0.5 during five consecutive breaths with those obtained by the conventional method. A good correlation was seen in Rl, C0 and C0.5 between the two methods. Second, we studied airway response to allergen inhalation before and after oral administration of a long-acting beta 2-stimulant (procaterol, 50 micrograms or 100 micrograms) or placebo in a double- blind crossover trial in six atopic asthmatic subjects. In control allergen inhalation tests by administration of placebo, Rl increased progressively, and C0.5, expressed as percentage of control compliance at zero frequency (C0.5/COcont), decreased progressively. After 100 micrograms procaterol, Rl response to allergen was almost completely inhibited. However, a decrease in C0.5/C0cont was still observed. These findings suggest that pretreatment of asthmatic patients with procaterol can release allergen-induced bronchoconstriction of the central airways, but cannot release that of the peripheral airways.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.