Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Prakash, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Prakash, U.

Chest, Vol 96, 627-630, Copyright © 1989 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of acute chest and upper airway trauma

KS Hara and UB Prakash
Division of Thoracic Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

To determine the utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) in the short- term evaluation of patients with trauma, we identified 53 consecutive patients (45 male patients; mean age, 36 years) seen over a ten-year period who had FFB performed within the first three days of trauma to the chest and upper airway. There were eight deaths. Fifty patients had blunt trauma to the chest. These were mostly due to motor vehicle accidents (38 patients), crushing injuries (three patients), and falls (three patients). In addition, there were three patients with trauma to the neck. Physical and radiographic findings included pneumothorax (37 patients), subcutaneous emphysema (31), pulmonary contusion (22), hemothorax (21), mediastinal emphysema (16), flail chest (ten), atelectasis (ten), and hemoptysis (five). The FFB was of diagnostic use in 28 patients (53 percent) by revealing complete tracheal transection (one patient), tracheal laceration (three), complete bronchial transection (one), bronchial laceration (two), bronchial contusion (two), ongoing distal hemorrhage/pulmonary contusion (seven), aspirated material (three), mucous plugging/thick secretions (eight), and supraglottic lesions (three). One of the cases of tracheal laceration was not fully appreciated as a complete transection. We conclude that FFB has value in the short-term evaluation of patients with trauma.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Chest Physicians.