Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stauffer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zwillich, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stauffer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zwillich, C.

Chest, Vol 97, 302-307, Copyright © 1990 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Pulmonary function in obstructive sleep apnea. Relationships to pharyngeal resistance and cross-sectional area

JL Stauffer, DP White and CW Zwillich
Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey.

Reduction in the size of the pharynx and increased pharyngeal airflow resistance have been demonstrated in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We evaluated 15 men with severe OSA and 10 nonapneic control subjects matched for age and weight in order to determine if PCSA, inspiratory pharyngeal airflow resistance, and abnormal breathing events during sleep were associated with alterations in the flow-volume relationship and other awake PFTs. Pharyngeal cross-sectional area was determined by CT, and pharyngeal resistance between choanae and epiglottis was measured during quiet awake breathing. In patients with OSA, there was an inverse relationship between the mean cross-sectional area of the oropharynx and the ratio of FEF50%/FIF50% (rs = -0.54; p = 0.03). In all subjects, pharyngeal resistance was inversely related to percentage of predicted values for FEF25-75% (rs = -0.56; p = 0.01). The frequency of apneas during sleep was significantly (p less than 0.05) related to the percentage of predicted values for MVV, TLC, FVC, and PIF. Obesity appears to account for the strength of these relationships. Flow-volume loops and other PFTs did not distinguish patients with OSA from controls.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. ZERAH-LANCNER, F. LOFASO, A. COSTE, F. RICOLFI, F. GOLDENBERG, and A. HARF
Pulmonary Function in Obese Snorers with or without Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 522 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Chest Physicians.