Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, R

Chest, Vol 97, 645-650, Copyright © 1990 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Long-term treatment of chronic bronchitis with positive expiratory pressure mask and chest physiotherapy

EF Christensen, T Nedergaard and R Dahl
Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark.

Long-term treatment of chronic bronchitis with chest physiotherapy with or without positive expiratory pressure (PEP) by mask was studied in 43 patients randomly allocated to PEP treatment (PEP group, 20 patients) and conventional chest physiotherapy (control group, 23 patients). After instruction, the treatments were self-administered twice daily for 12 months (34 patients) and 5 months (9 patients). Twice weekly, patients filled in a diary concerning symptoms. The PEP group had significantly less cough and less mucus production. The number of acute exacerbations were calculated from the diaries and were lower in the PEP group compared to the control group, and 85 percent of the patients in the PEP group were free from acute exacerbations versus 48 percent in the control group. The PEP group also used less antibiotics and mucolytics. The PEP group had a small increase in FEV1 of mean 62 ml compared to a small decrease of 43 ml for the control group. Treatment with a simple PEP device can reduce morbidity in patients with chronic bronchitis and may preserve lung function from a more rapid decline.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
A. E Hollandl and B. M Buttonl
Is there a role for airway clearance techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
Chronic Respiratory Disease, April 1, 2006; 3(2): 83 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
F. D. McCool and M. J. Rosen
Nonpharmacologic Airway Clearance Therapies: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 250S - 259S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
A. F. Barker
Bronchiectasis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 2, 2002; 346(18): 1383 - 1393.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Chest Physicians.