Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammersley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammersley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R.

Chest, Vol 97, 869-872, Copyright © 1990 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

The correlation of subcarinal density visualized on plain chest roentgenograms with computed tomographic scans

JR Hammersley, CM Grum and RA Green
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

A prospective evaluation of 212 paired chest roentgenograms and computed tomographic (CT) scans was performed to determine the predictive value of detecting subcarinal adenopathy by finding increased subcarinal density on routine roentgenograms. Based on CT criteria for subcarinal lymphadenopathy, 37 true-positive and 124 true- negative cases of subcarinal adenopathy were found in 161 patients. Evaluation of density in the subcarinal area on the routine posteroanterior (PA) chest roentgenograms in these patients demonstrated a sensitivity of 72 percent and specificity of 96 percent for the detection of adenopathy when compared with established CT criteria. False-positive and false-negative appraisals of central mediastinal density on routine roentgenograms appear to be due to the super-imposition of other masses, bullae, or lack of appropriate roentgenographic contrast. The accuracy of predicting the presence or absence of subcarinal adenopathy from routine chest roentgenograms suggests that this observation is clinically useful and should be routinely evaluated.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Chest Physicians.