Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinz, G
Right arrow Articles by Laczkovics, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heinz, G
Right arrow Articles by Laczkovics, A

Chest, Vol 97, 890-895, Copyright © 1990 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Clinical and electrophysiologic correlates of sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation. Observations in 42 patients

G Heinz, T Ohner, G Laufer, S Gasic and A Laczkovics
First Department of Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.

We assessed incidence and course of postoperative SN dysfunction in 42 cardiac transplant recipients. RHY, HR and CSNRT were compared in distinguishing between persistent (9 of 42 patients) and transient (11 of 42) SN dysfunction. Persistent SN dysfunction was distinguished by a significantly lower HR (day 14: 46.2 +/- 12 vs 67 +/- 19 bpm; day 21: 40.3 +/- 21 vs 70.8 +/- 16 bpm; p less than 0.05, respectively) and by RHY: postoperative AS (3 of 42) was found only in patients whose SN dysfunction persisted while patients with SR but prolonged CSNRT more often had transient impairment (6 of 42 vs 2 of 42); CSNRT, in contrast, is unlikely to be useful in distinguishing between transient and persistent SN dysfunction since exceptionally long CSNRTs (11,340 ms. 12,080 ms) occurred in patients with both types. Ischemic times were significantly longer in patients with transient impairment when compared with the group with normal SN function (155.1 +/- 36 vs 109.2 +/- 36 min, p less than 0.05) but did not differ significantly in patients with persistent SN dysfunction (124.8 +/- 32 min). Thus, (1) SN dysfunction after cardiac transplantation is common but most often transient; (2) RHY and HR are adequate follow-up parameters and best predictors of long-term SN function; (3) SN dysfunction after transplantation has important clinical implications given the unreliability of lower pacemakers to take over in 3 patients; (4) transient SN dysfunction is related to duration of ischemia during hypothermic preservation whereas pathogenesis of persistent SN dysfunction remains to be elucidated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Chest Physicians.