Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glanville, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robin, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glanville, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robin, E. D.

Chest, Vol 97, 1360-1366, Copyright © 1990 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Bronchial responsiveness after human heart-lung transplantation

AR Glanville, J Theodore, JC Baldwin and ED Robin
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Calif.

We evaluated bronchial responsiveness to inhaled albuterol (salbutamol), ipratropium bromide, methacholine, and propranolol in eight heart-lung transplant (HLT) recipients 2.3 +/- 1.5 months (mean +/- SD) (range, 1 to 4.5 months) after HLT. All patients had a restrictive ventilatory defect but none had airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC = 0.93 +/- 0.05) (range, 0.86 to 0.97). Specific airway conductance (sGaw) improved significantly with both albuterol (p less than 0.01) and ipratropium bromide (p less than 0.01) but FEV1 did not. Only one HLT patient had bronchoconstriction with propranolol, whereas all but one were hyperresponsive to methacholine. Prior inhalation of ipratropium bromide blocked the response to methacholine (p less than 0.005). Serial methacholine provocation tests performed in seven long- term survivors of HLT 24.6 +/- 16.0 months (range, 12 to 51 months) after HLT revealed no time-dependent evolution of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Limited maximal airway narrowing to methacholine was seen in five HLT recipients who showed a 29 +/- 4 percent (range, 23 to 35 percent) fall in FEV1 compared with two patients who did not achieve a plateau with a 47 percent and 63 percent fall in FEV1, respectively. These results further our understanding of bronchial responsiveness in the denervated transplanted lung. The findings of stable hyperresponsiveness to methacholine over a prolonged time interval, limited maximal airway narrowing to methacholine, and blockade of methacholine hyperresponsiveness by ipratropium bromide support the concept of denervation hypersensitivity of muscarinic receptors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S.M. Studer, R.D. Levy, K. McNeil, and J.B. Orens
Lung transplant outcomes: a review of survival, graft function, physiology, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 674 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. VAN MUYLEM, M. PAIVA, and M. ESTENNE
Involvement of Peripheral Airways during Methacholine-induced Bronchoconstriction after Lung Transplantation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2001; 164(7): 1200 - 1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. B. STANBROOK and S. KESTEN
Bronchial Hyperreactivity after Lung Transplantation Predicts Early Bronchiolitis Obliterans
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 1999; 160(6): 2034 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Chest Physicians.