Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelso, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelso, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, M.

Chest, Vol 98, 1426-1429, Copyright © 1990 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Effect of inhaled methacholine on inspiratory flow

JM Kelso, PL Enright, PD Scanlon, EJ O'Connell and MI Sachs
Section of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Allergy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

One hundred consecutive outpatients with symptoms suggestive of asthma who came to the Pulmonary Function Laboratory for a methacholine challenge test were studied. In addition to the forced expiratory maneuvers, forced inspiratory maneuvers were performed before and after the maximal response to methacholine. In 24 patients, the methacholine challenge suggested that they had asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] decrease greater than or equal to 20 percent). Six of these 24 patients also had a decrease in maximal forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax) greater than or equal to 20 percent and nine had a decrease in forced inspiratory flow at 50 percent of vital capacity (FIF50) greater than or equal to 20 percent, suggesting that bronchoconstriction can cause decreased inspiratory as well as expiratory flows. In 76 patients, the methacholine challenges were "negative" (FEV1 decrease less than or equal to 20 percent), suggesting that they did not have asthma. Nevertheless, in 11 of these 76 patients the FIFmax decrease was greater than or equal to 20 percent, and in 14 patients the FIF50 decrease was greater than or equal to 20 percent, suggesting that intermittent central airway obstruction is responsible for these patients' symptoms.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
B. D. Johnson, I. M. Weisman, R. J. Zeballos, and K. C. Beck
Emerging Concepts in the Evaluation of Ventilatory Limitation During Exercise: The Exercise Tidal Flow-Volume Loop
Chest, August 1, 1999; 116(2): 488 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Chest Physicians.