Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
First published online on March 13, 2008
Chest, doi:10.1378/chest.08-0255
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Dysphagia dietary guidelines and the rheology of nutritional feeds and barium test feeds

Abstract

Dysphagia can lead to aspiration of oral feeds causing pneumonia. Dysphagia is diagnosed by assessing the ability to swallow barium test feeds (BTF) of different viscosities. Dysphagia diet foods (DDF) are thickened as recommended by the National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) guidelines. There are no published data evaluating if the viscosity of BTF or commercial DDF meet NDD guidelines.

Methods: A TA1000 rheometer measured dynamic viscosity of BTF and DDF using creep transformation under controlled stress. Thin DDF studied included Boost Plus and Carnation Breakfast and nectar- and honey-thick DDF from Hormel and Novartis. The BTF studied were thin-, nectar- and honey-thick Polibar barium suspension or Varibar (E-Z-EM, Inc). We measured batch-to-batch variability in the viscosity of DDF, with and without shaking, and after 2 hours at ambient temperature at a shear rate chosen to match natural swallowing.

Results: [1] DDF: The viscosity of honey-thick DDF was consistent with NDD guidelines but other products were not. All products had minimal change in viscosity over 2 hours. Boost thin liquid had >300% increase in viscosity after shaking. [2] BTF: Thin barium had a viscosity consistent with NDD guidelines. The nectar- and honey-thick Polibar BTFs were thixotropic and had unacceptably high viscosity. Varibar BTFs were not thixotropic but were more viscous than the NDD guidelines.

Conclusions: There was a poor relationship between the viscosity of DDF and BTF. The viscosity of BFTs is much greater than the correspondingly named diet foods and the NDD guidelines. This can place patients at significant risk for oral aspiration.

Key Words: swallowing • dysphagia • rheology • viscoelasticity • modified barium swallow







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Chest Physicians.