|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. LoBue and Catanzaro), University of California, San Diego Medical Center, and the Tuberculosis Control Program (Mr. Cass, Ms. Lobo, and Ms. Moser), San Diego County Department of Health Services.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective chart review.
Setting: A county TB control program.
Methods: The San Diego County TB Control Program's computer database was used to identify homeless individuals placed in one of two supervised housing programs for treatment of TB [Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), for noninfectious patients, or Bissell House, for infectious patients]. Charts for all these patients were reviewed and information regarding their demographics, underlying medical conditions, therapy, microbiologic markers of response to therapy, hospitalizations, and participation in supervised housing programs was recorded.
Measurements and results: The sputum culture conversion and treatment completion rates for those housed in the YMCA were 100 and 84.6%, respectively. Of the patients in the Bissell House program, 100% had converted their smear and culture. In addition, all patients in this program completed an adequate course of supervised therapy. These rates of microbiologic conversion and treatment completion compare favorably with historical data from San Diego County and other locations. Estimated cost savings for placing medically stable infectious patients in the Bissell House for respiratory isolation and supervised treatment were estimated to be $27,034 per patient.
Conclusions: Use of supervised housing to aid in treatment of TB in the homeless appears to be effective and results in substantial cost savings. A larger multicenter study should be considered to confirm these findings and better quantify the cost-effectiveness of such programs.
Key Words: directly observed therapy homelessness supervised housing tuberculosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
notably homelessness. In fact in one study of 224 1970s to the early 1990s.2 Among the factors contributing to this resurgence were the HIV epidemic, the decline in funding for TB control programs, and worsening social and economic conditions, most notably homelessness. In fact in one study of 224 consecutive patients with TB admitted to a large city public hospital, 68% were homeless or lived in an unstable housing situation.3 Of these, 178 were discharged with anti-TB therapy, 89% of which were subsequently lost to follow-up and did not complete treatment. Failure to complete treatment not only leads to morbidity and mortality in the individual patient but also to the spread of the disease to others in the community. In addition, partial treatment of TB can result in the dreaded complication of multiple drug resistance (MDR), a phenomenon that became widespread in several US cities during the 1980s and early 1990s.2
Major efforts have been directed at controlling these public health problems with some success. Among the factors cited for improving the situation are better use of effective, short course treatment regimens, better institutional infection control measures, and perhaps, most importantly, the increased use of directly observed therapy (DOT).2 Even with these improvements, the problem of TB among the homeless remains significant. In a study of TB in homeless men in New York, 53% failed to complete therapy despite being in a DOT program.4 Burman et al5 reported in a Denver, CO, study that 18% of that city's DOT program patients were noncompliant with DOT and homelessness was a significant risk factor for noncompliance.
In the 1980s and early 1990s, problems with TB control among the homeless, similar to those described above, also occurred in San Diego County. The first major effort to deal with this problem was the implementation of essentially universal use of DOT among the homeless, which went into effect in 1992. However, based on subsequent experience and studies such as the ones cited above, it was recognized that DOT alone may not be sufficient to ensure completion of therapy among homeless individuals.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because the YMCA was not an appropriate site for infectious individuals, a second housing option, known as the Bissell House, was developed. This project, begun in 1996, was developed jointly by ALASDIC and SDDHS. Infectious TB patients who were medically appropriate to initiate or continue TB treatment on an outpatient basis, but who did not have suitable housing were eligible for this program. The housing unit consisted of a detached cottage in a residential complex. The patient was required to remain in the cottage at all times until given clearance to do otherwise by SDDHS personnel. Compliance was monitored by visits from SDDHS personnel, an on-site manager, and an electronic monitoring device, which was attached to the patient's ankle. Failure to comply with SDDHS policies and procedures resulted in the removal of the patient from the Bissell House to an acute care hospital or other appropriate setting. SDDHS and the San Diego County Housing and Community Development Departments provided the majority of funding for the Bissell House.
Review of Patient Records
Using the San Diego County TB Control Program's computer
database, all cases of TB in homeless individuals for the year 1995
(the first full year the YMCA program was in place) were identified. A
patient was considered homeless if he/she met the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) definition for homelessness at any time
while under treatment. According to the CDC, a person is homeless if
he/she "is not paying rent, does not own a home or is not steadily
living with friends or relatives." Charts for all these patients were
reviewed in detail to obtain the following information: patient's age,
sex, race, country of origin, HIV status, AFB smear, culture and
sensitivity results, site of TB, treatment regimen, duration of
treatment, culture conversion, interruptions in therapy, number of
hospital admissions, and whether the therapy was considered complete.
(Treatment was considered complete if the patient completed a treatment
regimen that was in accordance with the 1994 American Thoracic
Society/CDC guidelines.6
) In addition, medical records
were reviewed for all individuals housed in the Bissell House between
April 1996 and November 1997. These data were recorded anonymously
using the patient's medical record number, for identification. This
study was reviewed and approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the
University of California-San Diego (UCSD) Medical Center.
Cost Information
Cost figures for the YMCA program, Bissell House, DOT, and UCSD
hospital admissions were obtained from SDDHS records. These data were
used to estimate cost savings.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Hospital and Housing Program Stays and Estimated Cost
Savings
The number and duration of hospitalizations and
duration of stay in the housing programs are shown in Table 4
. The estimated cost savings of isolating infectious patients at the
Bissell House compared with isolating them in a hospital are shown in
Tables 5 and 6
. Prior to the Bissell House, homeless TB patients remained
hospitalized until they were no longer considered infectious as this
was the only option available. This was usually done at UCSD Medical
Center where San Diego County Medical Services pays a subacute daily
room charge of $651.00. The Bissell House has cost the county $55.90
per day resulting in a total cost of $17,776.20 for 318 days of
housing. Based on these figures, it is estimated that San Diego County
has saved $27,034.54 per patient in housing costs through the Bissell
House program.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the numbers are small, initial results suggest that both the YMCA and Bissell House programs are beneficial. TB treatment in patients in the YMCA program and the Bissell House, as manifested by microbiologic conversion of sputum and completion of therapy, was more successful than that for homeless patients in our prior experience in San Diego and as previously reported in the literature. In the YMCA program only 1 of 13 (7.7%) patients failed to complete therapy. Of patients in the Bissell House program, 100% completed treatment. This compares favorably to failure rates of 53% among homeless patients in a report from New York published in 19944 and with our prior experience. For example, only 48.4% of homeless patients in San Diego were confirmed to have completed therapy in 1993.8 Additionally, in the same year, 33.4 and 41.5% of homeless patients in San Diego did not have documented smear and culture conversion, respectively.8 In comparison, the culture conversion rate for the YMCA and Bissell House programs was 100%. The smear conversion rate for the Bissell House was also 100%.
The estimated cost savings from the YMCA and especially the Bissell House program also appear to be substantial. It is the policy of SDDHS that infectious patients without suitable housing be admitted to a hospital for isolation. Such patients remain hospitalized until they are no longer considered infectious, often for weeks after their acute medical needs have been met. The Bissell House provides an option for placement as soon as patients are medically stable and a space is available. After the patient converts his/her smear to negative (three negative sputum AFB smears on three consecutive days), he/she can then be transferred to the YMCA program to complete treatment. The stable treatment environment provided by the YMCA and Bissell House programs is expected to result in reduced rates of relapse, acquired drug resistance, and community spread of TB, producing further cost savings above those yielded by decreased hospital stays.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence to: Philip A. LoBue, MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, Mail Code 8374, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92103-8374; e-mail: plobue@ucsd.edu
Abbreviations: AFB = acid-fast bacillus; ALASDIC = American Lung Association of San Diego and Imperial Counties; CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DOT = directly observed therapy; MDR = multiple-drug resistant; SDDHS = San Diego Department of Health Services; UCSD = University of California, San Diego; YMCA = Young Men's Christian Association
Received for publication February 13, 1998. Accepted for publication July 31, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Controlling Tuberculosis in the United States Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2005; 172(9): 1169 - 1227. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Treatment of Tuberculosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 603 - 662. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Brewer, S. J. Heymann, S. M. Krumplitsch, M. E. Wilson, G. A. Colditz, and H. V. Fineberg Strategies to Decrease Tuberculosis in US Homeless Populations: A Computer Simulation Model JAMA, August 15, 2001; 286(7): 834 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lauzardo and D. Ashkin Phthisiology at the Dawn of the New Century Chest, May 1, 2000; 117(5): 1455 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |