Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Paggiaro, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Paggiaro, P.
(Chest. 1999;115:629-634.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Inhaled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Reverts Tolerance to the Protective Effect of Salmeterol on Allergen Challenge*

Daniele Giannini, MD; Elena Bacci, MD; Federico L. Dente, MD, FCCP; Antonella Di Franco, MD; Barbara Vagaggini, MD; Renato Testi, MD and Pierluigi Paggiaro, MD

* From the Cardiothoracic Department (Drs. Giannini, Bacci, Dente, Di Franco, Vagaggini, and Paggiaro), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, and Glaxo Wellcome (Dr. Testi), Verona, Italy.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study objective: One week of regular treatment with salmeterol can induce tolerance to the protective effect of a ß2-agonist on early airway response to allergen (EAR). The objective was to assess whether inhaled corticosteroids revert tolerance to salmeterol.

Study design: The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design.

Patients and methods: Twelve subjects with mild allergic asthma and positive result of specific bronchial provocation test (sBPT) to allergen underwent three sBPTs, separated by 1 week. sBPT was done in all subjects after a single dose (T1) and after 1 week of regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol (50 µg bid) (T2) in order to induce tolerance. Subjects were then randomized to receive either the same dose of salmeterol + beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 500 µg bid) (group 1, n = 6) or placebo + BDP (group 2, n = 6) for 1 week before sBPT (T3).

Results: After a single dose of salmeterol (T1), all subjects were protected against EAR, whereas after 1 week of regular treatment, the protective effect of salmeterol was totally or partially lost (T2). Maximum FEV1 percent fall (Max{Delta}FEV1%) after allergen inhalation was significantly higher at T2 than at T1. All subjects except one of group 1 were protected against EAR after salmeterol + BDP (T3), and Max{Delta}FEV1% at T3 (median, 12%; range, 4 to 6%) was significantly lower than T2 (median, 22%; range, 12 to 43%; p < 0.05 by Wilcoxon test). Subjects of group 2 did not show any significant protection against EAR after placebo + BDP treatment (T3) Max{Delta}FEV1% at T2 (median, 31%; range, 9 to 40%) and T3 (median, 31%; range, 3 to 42%; not significant).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the addition of inhaled BDP partially restored the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge that was lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol alone. This ability of BDP in reverting tolerance cannot be ascribed to a direct effect of corticosteroids per se on allergen challenge in this group of asthmatics.

Key Words: allergen challenge • asthma • ß2-agonist • inhaled corticosteroids • salmeterol • tolerance


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Several studies have demonstrated that short-term regular treatment with salmeterol leads to tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on bronchoconstricting stimuli, such as methacholine or exercise.1 ,2

In a previous study, it was shown that the protective effect of a single dose of salmeterol on allergen challenge was lost after regular treatment with salmeterol for 1 week.3 The patients in this study had mild asthma and used bronchodilators as needed, but not inhaled corticosteroids.

Corticosteroids have been proven to prevent or reverse tachyphylaxis induced in vitro by ß2-agonists,4 ,5 ,6 but few studies have been carried out in vivo. A previous study reported that a single dose of systemic steroids can restore the bronchodilator activity of ß2-agonists in seven asthmatic patients.7 Because inhaled corticosteroids alone do not prevent tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on methacholine challenge,8 it is not clear whether therapeutic doses of inhaled corticosteroids may revert the tolerance to salmeterol that occurs in previously untreated patients.

To address this issue, subjects with tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge induced by 1 week of treatment with salmeterol were treated for a further week with salmeterol and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), after which they again underwent allergen challenge. As control, a group of subjects with tolerance to inhaled salmeterol underwent allergen challenge after 1-week treatment with BDP + placebo.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects
We investigated a group of nonsmoking asthmatic subjects, in a stable phase of the disease. Asthma diagnosis was done according to international guidelines.9 All subjects had a positive skin prick test to one or more common airborne allergens, positive methacholine challenge test, and developed an early airway response (EAR) after specific bronchial provocation test (sBPT) with allergen (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus). All subjects were occasionally (< 1 time a week) taking inhaled rescue short-acting ß2-agonists, with no regular therapy. At the time of present investigation, all subjects were classified as having mild intermittent asthma.9

Of the 18 subjects screened for the study, we selected 12 subjects (10 were male and 2 were female), with a mean age of 20 ± 4 years, who had demonstrated the occurrence of tolerance to salmeterol on allergen challenge after 1 week of treatment with salmeterol. The main clinical findings of 12 asthmatic subjects who develop tolerance to the bronchoprotection ability of salmeterol, and of 6 asthmatics subjects who did not develop tolerance, are reported in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Examined Subjects

 
Study Protocol
The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, in order to assess whether the addition of inhaled BDP (500 µg bid) restores the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge in patients who had previously developed tolerance to salmeterol.

During the first part of the protocol, all subjects with a previous positive response to allergen challenge (T0) again underwent allergen challenge after a single dose (50 µg) of inhaled salmeterol (T1), followed by a second allergen challenge after regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol (50 µg bid) for 1 week (T2) (Fig 1 ).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Protocol schedule. T0 = screening sBPT, T1 = sBPT after a single dose of salmeterol (SALM; 50 µg), T2 = sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (50 µg bid), T3 = sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (50 µg bid) and BDP (500 µg bid) in group 1, or placebo (PLAC) and BDP (500 µg bid) in group 2.

 
In the second part of the protocol, subjects were randomized in two groups: (1) group 1 (n = 6 subjects) receiving salmeterol (50 µg bid) and BDP (500 µg bid); and (2) group 2 (n = 6 subjects) receiving BDP (500 µg bid) and placebo (two puffs bid). After 1 week of randomized treatment, all subjects underwent a third bronchial challenge (T3) after BDP + salmeterol in group 1 or BDP + placebo in group 2.

Each allergen challenge was performed at the same time of the day (12 AM), 1 h after the last drug inhalation, by administering the same provocative dose of allergen as in the screening challenge. Between T1, T2, and T3, all subjects recorded diurnal and nocturnal symptom score (ranging from 0 to 4 for each day or night) and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) on a diary card.

sBPT With Allergen
sBPT was performed with allergens standardized in biological units (BU) according to a method described previously.10 Allergen extract solution was delivered by a jet nebulizer, (model 646; DeVilbiss; Somerset, PA) connected to a dosimeter driven by compressed air. Lyophilized allergen extract (NeoAbellò; Milano, Italy) was dissolved in saline solution to obtain two solutions with different concentrations, 1 and 10 BU/mL. The nebulizer was filled with 3 mL of diluent (phenol 0.4% in saline solution) or allergen solution. After baseline spirometry, the patient inhaled three puffs of diluent, followed at 10-min intervals by a different number of allergen solution inhalations. The cumulative doses of allergen were, at each step, as follows: 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 BU. FEV1 was measured 10 min after the end of each series of allergen inhalations by means of a water-sealed bell spirometer connected to a computer (Olivetti 240; Biomedin; Padova, Italy). The inhalations were continued until FEV1 decreased by 20% from the postdiluent value, and the total dose of delivered allergen was recorded. FEV1 was then measured after 20, 30, and 60 min. A positive response was defined as a > 20% fall in FEV1 from the postdiluent value.

The degree of EAR was expressed as the maximum decrease in FEV1 after allergen inhalation (Max{Delta}FEV1%) and as the area under the curve, computed by trapezoid integration in the first hour after the last dose of inhaled allergen.

PEF Flow Monitoring
All subjects were asked to monitor PEF by means of a mini-Wright peak flowmeter (Clement Clarke; Harlow Essex, UK) two times daily for 7 consecutive days between two sBPTs. On each occasion, the subjects performed three blows and recorded the highest value on a diary card. Subjects were also instructed to measure PEF each time they had dyspnea or wheeze, to use only rescue ß2-agonist, and to repeat measurements 10 min after ß2-agonist inhalation. PEF values were entered into a computer (M280 Olivetti; Biomedin) programmed to obtain, for each record, several indexes of daily variability.11 For analysis we used the mean maximal amplitude (maximum daily value minus minimum daily value, in percentage of daily mean value) on all days of monitoring.

Statistical Analysis
FEV1 is expressed as mean ± SD. Maximum FEV1% fall after allergen challenge and the area under the curve are expressed as median (range). Paired t test and analysis of variance for repeated measures were used to compare groups of observations for normally distributed data, while Wilcoxon test and Friedman test were used for nonnormally distributed data.12 A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Protection index (PI) was computed as the percent ratio between maximum FEV1 percent fall during bronchial challenge after pharmacologic treatment (T1, T2, or T3), and maximum FEV1 percent fall during screening sBPT (T0). A PI of >= 50% was considered as significant.13


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Baseline values of FEV1 were not significantly different among allergen challenges, both as absolute values and as percent of the predicted value (FEV1, L [FEV1%]: 3.9 ± 0.8 [99 ± 14%]; 4.0 ± 0.8 [101 ± 15%]; 4.1 ± 0.7 [103 ± 13%]; 4.1 ± 0.7 [104 ± 12%] in T0, T1, T2, and T3, respectively).

A single dose of salmeterol inhibited allergen-induced EAR in all subjects, whereas after 1 week of salmeterol treatment, a significant reduction in the protective effect of salmeterol on EAR was observed, both when Max{Delta}FEV1% and the area under the curve during allergen challenge were considered (Table 2 ). The loss of the protective effect of 1 week of salmeterol treatment was of similar degree both in group 1 and group 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Decrease in FEV1 and Area Under Curve by Treatment Group During Allergen Challenge

 
Subjects treated with inhaled BDP in addition to salmeterol for 1 week (group 1) showed a partial recovery of the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge (Fig 2 ). Subjects treated with BDP alone for 1 week (group 2) showed no protective effect of BDP on early response to allergen inhalation (Fig 3 ).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Time course of fall in FEV1 from baseline ({Delta}FEV1 percent) in subjects of group 1 during allergen challenge test, performed as screening (T0), after pretreatment with a single dose of salmeterol (T1), after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (T2), and after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol and BDP (T3). T2 was significantly different from T3 at any time points.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Time course of fall in FEV1 from baseline ({Delta}FEV1%) in subjects of group 2 during allergen challenge test, performed as screening (T0), after pretreatment with a single dose of salmeterol (T1), after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (T2), and after 1 week of regular treatment with placebo and BDP (T3). There was no significant difference between T2 and T3 at any time points.

 
Table 2 shows the maximum decrease in FEV1 and the area under the curve during sBPT at T1, T2, and T3. There was a significant difference among tests in each group (p < 0.05, Friedman test). In group 1, Max{Delta}FEV1% during sBPT at T3 was significantly lower than at T2, and it was no different from T1. Similar results were obtained by considering the area under the curve. In group 2, Max{Delta}FEV1% and the area under the curve at T3 were similar to the values measured at T2, and significantly different from T1.

When individually considered, in group 1, only two subjects were protected against EAR at T2 (PI >= 50%), while five subjects were protected against EAR in T3. However, in group 2, only one subject was protected at T2 (PI >= 50%) as well as at T3.

The stability of the disease during the study protocol was confirmed by the low symptom score and PEF variability. When all subjects were considered, no significant difference was observed between the 2 weeks of the study protocol (week between T1 and T2; week between T2 and T3) in diurnal symptom score (mean ± SD: 0.6 ± 0.8 vs 0.6 ± 1.2, respectively), nocturnal symptom score (mean ± SD: 0.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.1 ± 0.2), PEF variability (maximal amplitude daily mean: 4.7 ± 2 vs 5.3 ± 3), and use of rescue salbutamol (number of actuations in 1 week: 0.5 ± 0.7 vs 0.5 ± 0.9). Similar results were obtained when group 1 and group 2 subjects were separately considered.


    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After 1 week of treatment, salmeterol loses its protective effect on allergen challenge, but this protective effect is partially restored by BDP. By itself, BDP does not afford protection against decrease in pulmonary function caused by allergen challenge, because BDP alone does not determine any significant change on EAR in comparison to pretreatment baseline sBPT.

The development of tolerance to the effects of ß2-agonists is well known.14 Tolerance to the bronchodilator effect has been reported for formoterol15 but not for salmeterol.16 ,17 Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine,1 exercise,2 and allergen challenge3 has been demonstrated. To our knowledge, there are no data available about the prevalence of this phenomenon in the general asthma population; in this study, tolerance to salmeterol occurred in 12 of 18 patients studied consecutively. In general, the tolerance to the bronchodilator effect of long-acting ß2-agonist is less evident than the tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect.1 ,16 ,17 All studies considered only subjects with mild asymptomatic asthma who did not require regular anti-inflammatory treatment, including corticosteroids. It can be argued that the concomitant treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, which are the cornerstone in asthma treatment,9 could prevent this negative phenomenon by some interaction with the expression and/or the function of ß2-adrenoreceptors in human airways.

In vitro studies reported that corticosteroids reduce or revert ß-adrenoreceptor desensitization in blood lymphocytes.4 ,5 In contrast with our results, previous human studies reported that inhaled corticosteroids did not prevent the development of tolerance to the protective effect of inhaled ß2-agonists.18 ,19 ,20 Important differences can be found between other studies and ours in the selection of patients, in the drug used, and in the study design. Some authors studied subjects with mild asymptomatic asthma not regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids,19 ,20 while other authors included subjects with moderate-to-severe chronic asthma regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids.8 ,18 The ß2-agonist drug used for bronchoprotection was salmeterol in some studies8 ,19 and salbutamol in others.19 ,20 The bronchoconstricting stimulus was methacholine in all studies8 ,18 ,19 ,20 and was associated with allergen challenge in one study.20 Furthermore, the study protocols often have different durations of treatment and sequences of treatments. Finally, some authors use a parallel group design, others use crossover design. However, a positive effect of systemic corticosteroids on reverting the bronchodilator subsensitivity induced by formoterol21 and on restoring ß2-agonist bronchodilation in severe asthma7 has been demonstrated. Thus, the difference between our results and those of the previous studies may be ascribed to the different study protocol and to the different stimulus (allergen vs methacholine). We speculate that the tolerance induced by salmeterol on ß2-adrenoreceptors on mast cells, which are involved in the airway response to allergen challenge, might be more easily reverted by corticosteroids than the tolerance on ß2-adrenoreceptors on smooth muscle cells, which are involved in the response to methacholine challenge.

The protective effect of salmeterol + BDP association on allergen challenge might be ascribed to a direct effect of corticosteroids per se on airway responsiveness to allergen inhalation. Short-term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids prevents early airway response in a dose-dependent manner. In general, 1-week treatment with a low-to-moderate dose did not significantly influence the severity of airway response to allergen challenge.22 ,23 Our control group showed no significant change in the severity of EAR to allergen after 1 week of treatment with BDP alone. Therefore, we suggest that the lack of a significant airway response to allergen inhalation after 1 week of treatment with salmeterol + BDP in patients who had previously developed tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol is due to a reversion of the tolerance by inhaled BDP. The mechanism of this effect of corticosteroids in reverting the tolerance is not known, but might be related to the ability of corticosteroids in increasing the density and/or the function of ß2-adrenoreceptors on inflammatory cells.24

Our study included subjects with mild intermittent asthma who did not require regular antiasthma treatment. Further studies are needed to assess whether tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol occurs also in long-term treated patients with moderate asthma. Indeed, in patients regularly treated with salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids, the tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol may have a clinical relevance in the management of the disease.

In conclusion, we showed that the association of BDP to salmeterol reverts the tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge in a group of asthmatic subjects. This observation may partially explain the positive interaction between inhaled ß2-agonists and corticosteroids in the long-term treatment of asthma.25 ,26


    Footnotes
 
Correspondence to: Daniele Giannini, MD, U.O. Fisiopatologia Respiratoria, Ospedale di Cisanello, via Paradisa 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy

Abbreviations: BDP = beclomethasone dipropionate; BU = biological unit; EAR = early airway response; Max{Delta}FEV1% = maximum decrease in FEV1 after allergen inhalation; PEF = peak expiratory flow; PI = protection index; sBPT = specific bronchial provocation test; T0 = screening sBPT; T1 = sBPT protected by a single dose of salmeterol (50 µg); T2 = sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (50 µg bid); T3 = sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (50 µg bid) and BDP (500 µg bid) in group 1 or placebo and BDP (500 µg bid) in group 2

Received for publication February 27, 1998. Accepted for publication September 28, 1998.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cheung, D, Timmers, MC, Zwindmerman, AH, et al (1992) Long-term effect of a long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. N Engl J Med 327,1198-1203[Abstract]
  2. Ramage, L, Lipworth, BJ, Ingram, CG, et al (1994) Reduced protection against exercise induced bronchoconstriction after chronic dosing with salmeterol. Respir Med 88,363-368[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Giannini, D, Carletti, A, Dente, FL, et al (1996) Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge. Chest 110,1452-1457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hui, KPP, Conolly, ME, Tashkin, DP (1982) Reversal of human lymphocyte ß-adrenoceptor desensitization by glucocorticosteroids. Clin Pharmacol Ther 32,566-571[ISI][Medline]
  5. Brodde, O-E, Brinkmann, M, Schemuth, R, et al (1985) Terbutaline-induced desensitization of human lymphocyte ß2-adrenoceptor: accelerated restoration of ß-adrenoceptor responsiveness by prednisone and ketotifen. J Clin Invest 76,1096-1101
  6. Davies, AO, Lefkowitz, RJ (1983) In vitro desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors in human neutrophils: attenuation by corticosteroids. J Clin Invest 71,565-571
  7. Ellul-Micallef, R, Fenech, FF (1975) Effect of intravenous prednisolone in asthmatics with diminished adrenergic responsiveness. Lancet 2,1269-1271[Medline]
  8. Booth, H, Bish, R, Walters, J, et al (1996) Salmeterol tachyphylaxis in steroid treated asthmatic subjects. Thorax 51,1100-1104[Abstract]
  9. . National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1992) International consensus report on diagnosis and treatment of asthma. Eur Respir J 5,601-641[ISI][Medline]
  10. Paggiaro, PL, Dente, FL, Talini, D, et al (1990) Pattern of airway response to allergen extract of Phleum pratensis in asthmatic patients during and outside the pollen season. Respiration 57,51-56[Medline]
  11. Paggiaro, PL, Moscato, G, Giannini, D, et al (1997) Relationship between peak expiratory flow (PEF) and FEV1. Eur Respir J 10(suppl 24),39s-41s
  12. Siegel, S, Castellan, NJ (1992) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Libri Italia Rrl Milano, Italy.
  13. Anderson, S, Seale, JP, Ferris, L, et al (1979) An evaluation of pharmacotherapy for exercise-induced asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 64,612-624[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Cockcroft, DW, Swystun, VA (1996) Functional antagonism: tolerance produced by inhaled ß2 agonists. Thorax 51,1051-1056[ISI][Medline]
  15. Newnham, DM, McDevitt, DG, Lipworth, BJ (1994) Bronchodilator subsensitivity after chronic dosing with eformoterol in patients with asthma. Am J Med 97,29-37[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  16. Britton, MG, Earnshaw, JS, Palmer, JBD (1992) A 12 months comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J 5,1062-1067[Abstract]
  17. Lotvall, J, Lunde, H, Ullman, A, et al (1992) Twelve months treatment with inhaled salmeterol in asthmatic patients: effect on ß2-receptor function and inflammatory cells. Allergy 47,477-483[Medline]
  18. Karla, S, Swystun, VA, Bhagat, R, et al (1996) Inhaled corticosteroids do not prevent the development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol. Chest 109,953-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cockcroft, DW, Swystun, VA, Bhagat, R (1995) Interaction of inhaled ß2-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid on airway responsiveness to allergen and methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152,1485-1489[Abstract]
  20. Yates, DH, Kharitonov, SA, Barnes, PJ (1996) An inhaled glucocorticosteroid does not prevent tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of a long-acting inhaled ß2-agonist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154,1603-1607[Abstract]
  21. Tan, KS, Hall, IP, Dewar, J, et al (1997) Association between ß2-adrenoceptor polymorphism and susceptibility to bronchodilator desensitisation in moderate severe stable asthmatics. Lancet 350,995-999[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Pizzichini, MMM, Kidney, JC, Wong, BJO, et al (1996) Effect of salmeterol compared with beclomethasone on allergen-induced asthmatic and inflammatory responses. Eur Respir J 9,449-455[Abstract]
  23. Dahl, R, Johansson, S-A (1982) Importance of duration of treatment with inhaled budesonide on the immediate and late bronchial reaction. Eur J Respir Dis 63(suppl 122),167-175
  24. Tan, KS, Grove, A, Cargill, RI, et al (1996) Effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and oral prednisolone on lymphocyte ß2-adrenoceptors function in asthmatic patients. Chest 109,342-347
  25. Greening, AP, Ind, PW, Northfield, M, et al (1994) Added salmeterol versus higher-dose corticosteroid in asthma patients with symptoms on existing inhaled corticosteroid. Lancet 344,219-224[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Pauwels, RA, Lofdhal, CG, Postma, DS, et al (1997) Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. N Engl J Med 337,1405-1411[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Bateman, H. Nelson, J. Bousquet, K. Kral, L. Sutton, H. Ortega, and S. Yancey
Meta-analysis: Effects of Adding Salmeterol to Inhaled Corticosteroids on Serious Asthma-Related Events
Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2008; (2008) 0000605-200807010-00229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
QJMHome page
G.P. Currie, C.M. Jackson, S.A. Ogston, and B.J. Lipworth
Airway-stabilizing effect of long-acting {beta}2-agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids
QJM, June 1, 2003; 96(6): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. J. Vanacker, E. Palmans, R. A. Pauwels, and J. C. Kips
Effect of Combining Salmeterol and Fluticasone on the Progression of Airway Remodeling
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2002; 166(8): 1128 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Giannini, A. Di Franco, E. Bacci, F. L. Dente, M. L. Bartoli, B. Vagaggini, and P. Paggiaro
Tolerance to the Protective Effect of Salmeterol on Allergen Challenge Can Be Partially Restored by the Withdrawal of Salmeterol Regular Treatment
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1671 - 1675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
D R Taylor and R J Hancox
Interactions between corticosteroids and beta agonists
Thorax, July 1, 2000; 55(7): 595 - 602.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. P. ANDERSON
Interactions between Corticosteroids and beta -Adrenergic Agonists in Asthma Disease Induction, Progression, and Exacerbation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2000; 161(3): S188 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. W. Cockcroft, B. E. Davis, V. A. Swystun, D. Giannini, and P. Paggiaro
Salmeterol, Inhaled Corticosteroids, and Tolerance to Allergen Bronchoprotection
Chest, November 1, 1999; 116(5): 1497 - 1498.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Paggiaro, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Paggiaro, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS