Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rutala, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rutala, W. A.
(Chest. 1999;115:34S-41S.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Nosocomial Infections in the ICU*

The Growing Importance of Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens

David J. Weber, MD, MPH; Ralph Raasch, PharmD and William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH

* From the Adult (Drs. Weber and Rutala) and Pediatric (Dr. Weber) Infectious Disease Divisions, University of North Carolina School of Medicine; the Department of Epidemiology (Dr. Weber), University of North Carolina School of Public Health; the Department of Hospital Epidemiology (Drs. Weber and Rutala), University of North Carolina Hospitals; and, the University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy (Dr. Raasch), Chapel Hill, NC.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Patients hospitalized in ICUs are 5 to 10 times more likely to acquire nosocomial infections than other hospital patients. The frequency of infections at different anatomic sites and the risk of infection vary by the type of ICU, and the frequency of specific pathogens varies by infection site. Contributing to the seriousness of nosocomial infections, especially in ICUs, is the increasing incidence of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Prevention and control strategies have focused on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli, among others. An effective infection control program includes a surveillance system, proper handwashing, appropriate patient isolation, prompt evaluation and intervention when an outbreak occurs, adherence to standard guidelines on disinfection and sterilization, and an occupational health program for health-care providers. Studies have shown that patients infected with resistant strains of bacteria are more likely than control patients to have received prior antimicrobials, and hospital areas that have the highest prevalence of resistance also have the highest rates of antibiotic use. For these reasons, programs to prevent or control the development of resistant organisms often focus on the overuse or inappropriate use of antibiotics, for example, by restriction of widely used broad-spectrum antibiotics (eg, third-generation cephalosporins) and vancomycin. Other approaches are to rotate antibiotics used for empiric therapy and use combinations of drugs from different classes.

Key Words: antimicrobial resistance • broad-spectrum antibiotics • drug-resistant pathogens • nosocomial infections


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Since the 1980s, infectious disease specialists have recognized that ICU patients acquire nosocomial infections at a much higher rate than patients elsewhere in the hospital. For ICU patients, the risk is as much as 5 to 10 times greater than for those on general medical wards.1 ,2 ,3 ,4 This increased risk of nosocomial infection results from three major factors: (1) intrinsic risk factors related to the need for intensive care, such as severe underlying disease, multiple illnesses, malnutrition, extremes of age, and immunosuppression; (2) invasive medical devices, such as endotracheal tubes for mechanical ventilation, intravascular catheters, and urinary tract catheters; (3) crowding (eg, neonatal ICU) and animate reservoirs (eg, colonized or infected patients), which increase the risk of cross-infection in the ICU.

The most representative data on nosocomial infection rates have been provided by the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system.5 NNIS data indicate that today’s typical hospitalized patient may be sicker than in former years. Data from surveys of NNIS hospitals between 1988 and 1995 demonstrate a significant increase in the number of ICU beds and a slight decrease, not reaching statistical significance, in total beds.6

Surveillance data from ICUs are available for the years 1986 through 1997 (Table 1 ). 7 Risk adjustment is provided by stratifying the data by type of ICU and type of invasive medical device (ie, ventilator, central venous catheter, urinary tract catheter) and by presenting the infection rate as infections per 1,000 device days. Further risk adjustment has been performed for infections in neonatal ICUs by stratifying patients by birth weight.7 ,8


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Device-Associated Infection Rates by Type of ICU7

 
From the NNIS data, one may conclude the following: the relative frequency of different sites of nosocomial infections (ie, ventilator-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections) and the absolute risk of infection (per 1,000 device days) vary by type of ICU; the relative frequency of different nosocomial pathogens varies by site of infection (Table 2 ); and the site-specific rates of nosocomial infections in similar types of ICUs vary 10- to 20-fold among hospitals.7


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Distribution of the Five Most Common Nosocomial Pathogens Isolated From the Four Major Infection Sites in the ICU, January 1986–April 19977

 

    Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the ICU
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
In the hospital, concern about drug-resistant pathogens has focused on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),9 ,10 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus sp (VRE),11 ,12 ,13 extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli,14 multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis,15 fluconazole-resistant Candida sp,16 and most recently, strains of S aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—because such strains have now been isolated in Japan and the United States.17 This concern has been fueled by multiple reports of outbreaks of infection caused by these pathogens and increasing rates of endemic infection in ICU patients. However, only limited data are available regarding the prevalence of these pathogens in ICUs throughout the United States. Data obtained from the NNIS system documents the increasing frequency of VRE in US hospitals (Fig 1 ). 17 ,18 Archibald and colleagues6 reported the prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens isolated from different patient populations of eight hospitals between 1994 and 1995 (Table 3 ). For five of these antimicrobial/pathogen combinations, the percentage of resistant isolates was significantly higher in the ICU than in the two other settings.6



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Nosocomial Enterococcus in the United States, 1992 through 1996. From Summary of Notifiable Diseases, United States, 1996 MMWR.49

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Resistance to Specific Antimicrobials in Isolates From Inpatients vs Outpatients for Sentinel Antimicrobial/Pathogen Combinations*

 

    Control of Nosocomial Infections in the ICU
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Weinstein19 has summarized the traditional infection-control measures used in ICUs (Table 4 ). Unfortunately, as noted by Weinstein, these control measures often fail because frequently patients are already colonized with "nosocomial" bacteria when hospitalized and because endogenous flora in ICU patients is often amplified by antibiotics and gastric alkalization. Other factors include selection by antibiotic pressure on antibiotic-resistant bacterial subpopulations and spontaneous bacterial resistance mutation, lapses in aseptic care during a crisis, spread on hands of personnel caring for ventilator-dependent patients who have heavy respiratory tract colonization or infection, unrecognized environmental reservoirs, and new devices that break through anatomic barriers.19


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Traditional Infection Control Measures in ICUs*

 
Key elements of an effective infection control program include a surveillance system,20 proper hand washing before and after contact with each patient or patient equipment,21 appropriate isolation of patients with transmissible pathogens, prompt evaluation and intervention in cases of outbreaks,22 adherence to standard guidelines on disinfection and sterilization of medical equipment,23 and an effective program of occupational health focusing on preexposure and postexposure management of health-care providers.24 Proper hand washing, isolation, and disinfection are critical to prevent transmission of resistant pathogens between patients via contaminated equipment or contaminated hands of health-care providers. GI tract colonization of health-care providers with resistant pathogens does not appear to be a reservoir of these infectious agents.25


    Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistance
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Consensus statements have been published recently that delineate strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in hospitals.26 ,27 Prevention strategies are based on minimizing the transmission of antibiotic-resistant pathogens between patients (Tables 5 and 6) and developing a program to prevent or reduce antimicrobial resistance (Table 7 ). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published general isolation guidelines to minimize the risk of transmission of infectious agents from colonized/infected patients to other patients or health-care providers.21 Detailed infection-control recommendations have been published to minimize the transmission of MRSA,28 VRE,18 and S aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.17


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7. Elements of an Optimal Antimicrobial Control Program to Study the Prevention or Reduction of Antimicrobial Resistance*

 
Consensus guidelines define an MRSA outbreak as "an increase in the rate of MRSA cases or a clustering of new cases due to the transmission of a single microbial strain in a health-care institution, including long-term care facilities."28 The following threshold rates (number of new nosocomial cases per 100 hospital admissions/number of new nosocomial cases per 100 patient days) for identifying high rates of MRSA transmissions are provided: < 200 hospital beds, 0.13/0.25; 200 to 499 hospital beds, 0.25/0.3; and, >= 500 hospital beds, 0.5/0.6. A four-phase approach to control is recommended (Table 5 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Four-Phase Approach to the Management of an MRSA Outbreak*

 
The proper use of vancomycin (Table 6 )18 is especially important because vancomycin use has risen dramatically in recent years, and vancomycin use is one of the strongest risk factors for VRE colonization/infection. The CDC guidelines for preventing the spread of VRE include recommendations on the prudent use of vancomycin, an educational program on VRE for hospital personnel, routine testing of all enterococci isolated from blood and sterile body sites (except urine) for vancomycin resistance, screening of all enterococcal isolates for vancomycin resistance if VRE are detected, and appropriate use of isolation precautions for all VRE-infected or colonized patients.18


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Recommended Use of Vancomycin*

 
The focus on control of antimicrobial use stems from compelling evidence of a causal association between antimicrobial use in hospitals and resistance of pathogens to these antimicrobials.29 The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) guidelines point out the following: changes in the use of antibiotics parallel changes in the prevalence of resistance to them. Resistance is more prevalent in nosocomial bacterial strains than in those from the community. Hospital patients infected with resistant strains are more likely than control patients to have received prior antimicrobials. Hospital areas that have the highest prevalence of resistance also have the highest rates of use of antibiotics. The longer a patient is exposed to antimicrobials, the greater the likelihood of colonization with resistant organisms.27

Risk Factors
Multiple case-control studies have analyzed the risk factors associated with infection or colonization with MRSA or VRE. Both univariate analysis in individual case studies and multivariate analysis have demonstrated that antibiotic exposure30 ,31 ,32 ,33 and cephalosporin use are risk factors for infection with MRSA.33 ,34

To prevent or control antimicrobial resistance, the SHEA/IDSA guidelines propose the following: the selective removal, control, or restriction of antimicrobial agents or classes; the rotation of antimicrobial agents; and use of combination antimicrobial therapy. The SHEA/IDSA guidelines also review specific methods to implement antibiotic control policies (Table 8 ). The goal is to have all patients receive the most effective, least toxic, and least costly antibiotic for the precise period needed to cure or prevent an infection.27


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 8. Methods to Implement Antibiotic Control or Restriction Policies

 
Restriction of Antibiotic Use
By the early 1980s, most teaching hospitals had adopted restriction policies for the use of selected expensive agents.35 Himmelberg and colleagues36 demonstrated that institution of restriction policies was associated with reduced antibiotic expenditures, but elimination of a restriction policy resulted in an increase of 103% in the cost of the previously restricted antibiotics.

In another study, implementation of a rigid protocol for the use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics resulted in cost savings of 57%.37 While antibiotic restriction policies clearly result in lower cost, the influence of these programs on the prevalence of resistance and on clinical outcomes has been less well defined. Decreased use of broad-spectrum cephalosporins has been associated temporally with decreased antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacilli,38 ,39 ,40 ,41 and decreased use of third-generation cephalosporins and vancomycin has been associated with a decreased incidence of VRE.42 Investigators have also found that antibiotic control policies resulted in a stable median-length stay and a reduction in the number of nosocomial infections treated with antimicrobial drugs.37 White and colleagues43 evaluated the institution of a policy that required prior authorization for selected parenteral antibiotics. Total parenteral antimicrobial expenditures decreased by 32% and susceptibilities to all ß-lactam and quinolone antibiotics increased. Importantly, for patients with bacteremia caused by Gram-negative bacilli, the restrictions did not change overall survival. Further, there were no differences in the median time from positive blood culture to the prescription of an appropriate antibiotic or in the median time to discharge from the hospital. Evans and coworkers44 developed a computerized decision-support program to assist physicians in the use of anti-infective agents. Patients who received antibiotics recommended by the computer program had significant reductions in the cost of anti-infective agents, total hospital costs, and length of hospital stay.

Substitution or rotation of antibiotics has been proposed as a method for decreasing the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Gerding et al45 reported that substitution of amikacin for gentamicin led to a significant reduction in resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin among Gram-negative bacilli. However, the first attempt to reintroduce gentamicin led to a resurgence of gentamicin resistance. Kollef and coworkers46 replaced ceftazidime with ciprofloxacin for empiric therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia and demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia attributed to antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, limitations with this study preclude accepting its conclusion that a scheduled change of antibiotic classes can reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. First, the incidence of pneumonia declined for unclear reasons. Second, only a single change was evaluated rather than multiple changes. Finally, the follow-up period was only 6 months.


    Conclusions
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Nosocomial infections, especially those caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens, represent an important source of morbidity and mortality for the patient hospitalized in an ICU. Important antibiotic-resistant nosocomial pathogens include MRSA, VRE, Gram-negative bacilli (especially, Klebsiella and Enterobacter) producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases, multiple drug-resistant M tuberculosis, and fluconazole-resistant Candida sp.

The key to control of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in the ICU is rigorous adherence to infection control guidelines and prevention of antibiotic misuse. Antibiotic restriction policies clearly result in reduced drug costs. Evidence suggests that reducing use of certain antibiotics may lead to a decreased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens: vancomycin, VRE; gentamicin, gentamicin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli; and, ceftazidime, Gram-negative bacilli producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Limited data suggest that measures to control antibiotic use do not adversely affect—and may actually improve—patient outcomes (eg, decreased length of stay, risk of subsequent infection).

Unfortunately, relatively few appropriately designed studies have evaluated the impact of antibiotic- and infection-control interventions on the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among nosocomial pathogens and on patient outcomes. The efficacy of intensive antibiotic control should be assessed in multicenter studies designed to avoid methodologic flaws.47 Preventing the emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms requires the adoption of a multifaceted approach.48


    Appendix 1
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Dr. Weber: I just want to go over briefly the nosocomial guidelines from the American Thoracic Society. These have a complicated scheme based on risk factors, onset of disease, etc. One of the weaknesses of the guidelines is that they just tell you to use a quinolone or a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination. I do not think many of us would use ampicillin/sulbactam in the ICU for nosocomial pneumonia, but that would meet the American Thoracic Society guidelines. I have updated this and added specific drugs. I believe that appropriate drugs would include piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime. If you have anaerobes, they suggest adding clindamycin. If you are worried about that, you can use piperacillin/tazobactam alone.

If the patient has severe pneumonia, then it is an aminoglycoside, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin plus one of the other drugs we just mentioned. In the ICUs in general, people are going to pick one of the combinations of piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, or meropenem with ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, or an aminoglycoside. I think that is going to be the standard therapy in ICUs, plus or minus vancomycin, depending on MRSA.

So antibiotic resistance is a growing problem and control of antibiotic use is crucial, but few guidelines can aid the clinician in what interventions to use. There are very limited data demonstrating effective control measures for outcomes other than cost. Most guidelines and multiple studies suggest that vancomycin should be limited, and that an increase in cephalosporin use increases the likelihood of VRE and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase. Obviously piperacillin/tazobactam is an excellent therapy for several common ICU infections, such as pneumonia, and may have a reduced risk of precipitating resistance.

Dr. Campbell: For prior authorization of an antibiotic, does the prescribing physician call the infectious disease specialist to ask, "May I use this drug?"

Dr. Weber: That is what we were doing up to about 8 years ago. The prescribing physicians would have to call the infectious diseases specialist, and then the infectious diseases specialist would ask, "Why do you want to use that?"

Dr. Campbell: This may work in a university or Veterans Affairs hospital, but once you try to move it into private hospitals—you cannot do it.

Dr. Weber: I agree that it is particularly hard in the private hospitals. Now we have moved away from prior authorization, and pharmacy has a set of guidelines as to which antibiotics should be used, depending on the clinical issues.


    Footnotes
 
Correspondence to: David Jay Weber, MD, MPH, CB 7030 Burnett-Womack, 547, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030

Abbreviations: CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NNIS = National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance; SHEA/IDSA = Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America; VRE = vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus sp


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Drug-Resistant Pathogens in the...
 Control of Nosocomial Infections...
 Prevention and Control of...
 Conclusions
 Appendix 1
 References
 

  1. Donowitz, LG, Wenzel, RP, Hoyt, JW (1982) High risk of hospital-acquired infection in the ICU patient. Crit Care Med 10,355-357[ISI][Medline]
  2. Chandrasekar, PH, Kruse, JA, Matthews, MF (1986) Nosocomial infection among patients in different types of intensive care units at a city hospital. Crit Care Med 14,508-510[ISI][Medline]
  3. Brown, RB, Hosmer, D, Chen, HC, et al (1985) A comparison of infections in different ICUs within the same hospital. Crit Care Med 13,472-476[ISI][Medline]
  4. Brawley, RL, Weber, DJ, Samsa, GP, et al (1989) Multiple nosocomial infections: an incidence study. Am J Epidemiol 130,769-780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al (1991) National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 19,19-35[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Archibald, L, Phillips, L, Monnet, D, et al (1997) Antimicrobial resistance in isolates from inpatients and outpatients in the United States: increasing importance of the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis 24,211-215[ISI][Medline]
  7. . National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report (1997) Data summary from October 1986–April 1997, issued May 1997: a report from the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control 25,477-487[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Gaynes, RP, Edwards, JR, Jarvis, WR, et al (1996) Nosocomial infections among neonates in high-risk nurseries in the United States. Pediatrics 98,357-361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Boyce, JM (1989) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: detection, epidemiology, and control measures. Infect Dis Clin North Am 3,901-913[Medline]
  10. Mulligan, ME, Standiford, HC, Kauffman, CA (1993) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a consensus review of the microbiology, pathogenesis, and epidemiology with implications for prevention and management. Am J Med 94,313-328[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Murray, BE (1997) Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Am J Med 102,284-293[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Eliopoulos, GM (1997) Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: mechanism and clinical relevance. Infect Dis Clin North Am 11,851-865[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Boyce, JM (1997) Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: detection, epidemiology, and control measures. Infect Dis Clin North Am 11,367-384[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Paterson DL, Ko WC, Mohapatra S, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: impact of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in a global study of 216 patients [abstract]. 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Sept 28–Oct 1, 1997; Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  15. . CDC. (1994) Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities, 1994. MMWR 43(No. RR-13),1-132
  16. White, TC, Marr, KA, Bowden, RA (1998) Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 11,382-402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. . CDC. (1997) Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—United States, 1997. MMWR 46,813-815[Medline]
  18. . CDC. (1994) Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance: recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR 44,1-13
  19. Weinstein, RA (1991) Epidemiology and control of nosocomial infections in adult intensive care units. Am J Med 91(suppl 3B),179S-184S[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Perl, TM (1997) Surveillance, reporting, and the use of computers. Wenzel, RP eds. Prevention and control of nosocomial infections 3rd ed. ,127-161 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD.
  21. Garner, JS (1996) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee: guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17,53-80[Medline]
  22. Wendt, C, Herwaldt, LA (1997) Epidemics: identification and management. Wenzel, R eds. Prevention and control of nosocomial infections 3rd ed. ,175-213 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD.
  23. Rutala, WA (1996) APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control 24,313-342[ISI][Medline]
  24. Bolyard, EA, Tablan, OC, Williams, WW, et al (1998) Guideline for infection control in health care personnel, 1998. Am J Infect Control 26,289-354
  25. Carmeli, Y, Venkataraman, L, DeGirolami, PC, et al (1998) Stool colonization of healthcare workers with selected resistant bacteria. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 19,38-40[ISI][Medline]
  26. Goldmann, DA, Weinstein, RA, Wenzel, RP, et al (1996) Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in hospitals: a challenge to hospital leadership. JAMA 275,234-240[Abstract]
  27. Shlaes, DM, Gerding, DN, John, JF, Jr, et al (1997) Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance: guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 25,584-599[ISI][Medline]
  28. Wenzel, RP, Reagan, DR, Bertino, JS, Jr, et al (1998) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak: a consensus panel’s definition and management guidelines. Am J Infect Control 26,102-110[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. McGowan, JE (1983) Antimicrobial resistance in hospital organisms and its relation to antibiotic use. Rev Infect Dis 5,1033-1048[ISI][Medline]
  30. Law, MR, Gill, ON (1988) Hospital-acquired infection with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive staphylococci. Epidemiol Infect 101,623-629[Medline]
  31. Hershow, RC, Khayr, WF, Smith, NL (1992) A comparison of clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13,587-593[ISI][Medline]
  32. Coll, PP, Crabtree, BF, O’Connor, PJ, et al (1994) Clinical risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria in a skilled-care nursing home. Arch Fam Med 3,357-360[Abstract]
  33. Washio, M, Mizoue, T, Kajioka, T, et al (1997) Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in a Japanese geriatric hospital. Public Health 111,187-190[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Peacock, JE, Jr, Marsik, FJ, Wenzel, RP (1980) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: introduction and spread within a hospital. Ann Intern Med 93,526-532[ISI][Medline]
  35. Klapp, DL, Ramphal, R (1983) Antibiotic restriction in hospitals associated with medical schools. Am J Hosp Pharm 40,1957-1960[Abstract]
  36. Himmelberg, CJ, Pleasants, RA, Weber, DJ, et al (1991) Use of antimicrobial drugs in adults before and after removal of a restriction policy. Am J Hosp Pharm 48,1220-1227[Abstract]
  37. Gyssens, IC, Geerligs, IEJ, Dony, JMJ, et al (1996) Optimising antimicrobial drug use in surgery: an intervention study in a Dutch university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 38,1001-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ballow, CH, Schentag, JJ (1992) Trends in antibiotic utilization and bacterial resistance: report of the National Nosocomial Resistance Surveillance Group. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 15,37S-42S[Medline]
  39. Bamberger, DM, Dahl, SL (1992) Impact of voluntary vs enforced compliance of third-generation cephalosporin use in a teaching hospital. Arch Intern Med 152,554-557[Abstract]
  40. Jones, RN (1992) The current and future impact of antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial bacterial pathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 15,3S-10S[Medline]
  41. Meyer, KS, Urban, C, Eagan, JA, et al (1993) Nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiella infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins. Ann Intern Med 119,353-358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Quale, J, Landman, D, Saurina, G, et al (1996) Manipulation of a hospital antimicrobial formulary to control an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 23,1020-1025[ISI][Medline]
  43. White, AC, Jr, Atmar, RL, Wilson, J, et al (1997) Effects of requiring prior authorization for selected antimicrobials: expenditures, susceptibilities, and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 25,230-239[ISI][Medline]
  44. Evans, RS, Pestotnik, SL, Classen, DC, et al (1998) A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med 338,232-238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Gerding, DN, Larson, TA, Hughes, RA, et al (1991) Aminoglycoside resistance and aminoglycoside usage: 10 years of experience in one hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35,1284-1290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kollef, MH, Vlasnik, J, Sharpless, L, et al (1997) Scheduled change of antibiotic classes: a strategy to decrease the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156,1040-1048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. McGowan, JE, Jr (1994) Do intensive hospital antibiotic control programs prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 15,478-483[ISI][Medline]
  48. Jarvis, WR (1996) Preventing the emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms through antimicrobial use controls: the complexity of the problem. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17,490-495[ISI][Medline]
  49. . CDC. (1997) Summary of notifiable diseases, United States, 1996. MMWR 45,1-87[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Corona, A. P. R. Wilson, M. Grassi, and M. Singer
Prospective audit of bacteraemia management in a university hospital ICU using a general strategy of short-course monotherapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2004; 54(4): 809 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
C.-L. Wu, P. Domenico, D. J. Hassett, T. J. Beveridge, A. R. Hauser, and J. A. Kazzaz
Subinhibitory Bismuth-Thiols Reduce Virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2002; 26(6): 731 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S.-S. Jean, L.-J. Teng, P.-R. Hsueh, S.-W. Ho, and K.-T. Luh
Antimicrobial susceptibilities among clinical isolates of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a Taiwanese University Hospital
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2002; 49(1): 69 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
L.-P. Choo-Smith, K. Maquelin, T. van Vreeswijk, H. A. Bruining, G. J. Puppels, N. A. N. Thi, C. Kirschner, D. Naumann, D. Ami, A. M. Villa, et al.
Investigating Microbial (Micro)colony Heterogeneity by Vibrational Spectroscopy
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2001; 67(4): 1461 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
N. Singh and V. L. Yu
Rational Empiric Antibiotic Prescription in the ICU
Chest, May 1, 2000; 117(5): 1496 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S G B Amyes
The rise in bacterial resistance
BMJ, January 22, 2000; 320(7229): 199 - 200.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rutala, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rutala, W. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS