|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (Drs. Kjeldsen and Vase), Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark; and the Paediatric Cardiology Unit (Dr. Oxhøj), the Department of Radiology (Drs. Andersen and Elle), and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (Drs. Kjeldsen and Jacobsen), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Correspondence to: Anette Drøhse Kjeldsen, MD, PhD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark; e-mail: ad.kjeldsen{at}ishmed.ou.dk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: To evaluate different screening methods applied for the identification of PAVMs.
Setting: Odense University Hospital.
Subjects: HHT patients with positive findings on contrast echocardiography (CE) who participated in a screening investigation and underwent pulmonary angiography (PA).
Methods: Different screening methods were evaluated against the results of PA. In a group of patients with positive findings on CE, we compared results of PA with the following: severity of dyspnea; results of pulse oximetry arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) supine and upright; supine PaO2 in room air and while breathing 100% oxygen; size of arteriovenous shunt in supine position; chest radiograph; and intensity of contrast at CE.
Results: PA was performed in 25 HHT patients with positive findings on CE, 15 of whom had PAVM. Embolization therapy was recommended in 12 patients, and 3 patients had small PAVMs not accessible for therapy. In 10 patients, PAVM could not be demonstrated at PA. The sensitivity and specificity calculated for the screening procedures are as follows: 53% and 90%, respectively, for SaO2; 60% and 100%, respectively, for chest radiograph; 73% and 80%, respectively, for PaO2 in room air; 100% and 40%, respectively, for PaO2 breathing 100% oxygen; and 64% and 80%, respectively, for shunt measurement.
Conclusion: Initial screening with CE followed by measurement of PaO2 while breathing 100% oxygen seemed to be the best screening procedure for identification of patients with PAVM. Screening with chest radiograph and pulse oximetry was shown to be insufficient.
Key Words: hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia pulmonary arteriovenous malformation pulmonary shunt Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome screening
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The prevalence of PAVMs among patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) has been estimated to be 15 to 33%3 5 6 ; screening for PAVM, with the purpose of preventing complications, is therefore relevant in this group of patients. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate different screening methods for identification of PAVM in a population of HHT patients with a high prevalence of PAVM, in order to assess the sensitivity of the tests, as well as the ease and safety of application.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All the patients underwent a clinical examination, and they were all asked about their physical capacity. The degree of dyspnea was rated according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I to IV criteria.8
CE was performed with a 2.5-MHz transducer (SSA-270A; Toshiba Medical Systems; Tokyo, Japan). The clearest possible apical four-chamber image was obtained with the individual in the left lateral decubitus position. Simultaneously during the 2-day recording session, double M-mode recordings were obtained to facilitate detection and timing of contrast appearance. The echo contrast, a 10 mL 3.5% polygelin solution (Hemaccel; Hoechst Marion Roussel; Frankfurt, Germany), was agitated vigorously and injected rapidly into a peripheral vein while the patient was breathing quietly. Injections that did not result in readily observable contrast in the right-sided chambers were repeated. Delayed appearance of the contrast in the left-sided chambers (ie, three to five heart cycles after the appearance in the right-sided chambers) was deemed to indicate presence of a pulmonary shunt. In an attempt to quantify the shunt size, the contrast intensity in the left-sided heart chambers was rated subjectively from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no visible contrast and 4 indicating equal contrast intensities in the left-sided and right-sided chambers.
Standard chest radiographs (anteroposterior and lateral views) were taken at maximum inspiration with the subject in the standing position. Chest radiographs were evaluated by the radiologist, who performed the PA procedures.
Pulse oximetry was performed in all subjects (model N20; Nellcor; Hayward, CA) with the patient breathing room air, in both the supine and upright positions. The sensor was placed on a finger tip, and the SaO2 was recorded after a minimum of 2 min of quiet breathing. An SaO2 < 96% and/or a change in SaO2 of two or more percentage points on changing posture was considered abnormal.
Measurement of the PaO2 in the supine position was performed with the patient breathing room air and after breathing 100% oxygen. The results obtained on room air were compared with age-adjusted reference values.9
Shunt measurements were performed during PA prior to contrast
injection. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously from the femoral
artery and from the pulmonary artery after the patient had been
breathing 100% oxygen for 15 min using a mouthpiece and a noseclip.
Sampling of blood from the pulmonary artery allowed exact measurement
of the oxygen content in the mixed venous blood. The fraction of the
pulmonary shunt was calculated according to the equation:
![]() |
s is the shunt flow,
t is the total
pulmonary flow, CaO2 is the arterial
oxygen content, CvO2 is the oxygen
content in mixed venous blood, and
CcO2 is the estimated oxygen content
at the postalveolar end of the pulmonary capillary calculated from the
alveolar air equation, assuming no alveolar-arterial oxygen tension
difference. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 15 patients (8 men and 7 women), at least one PAVM was demonstrated at PA. Twelve of these patients had PAVMs with feeding vessels > 3 mm and were referred for embolotherapy, while 3 other patients had smaller PAVMs. All clinical data are shown in Table 1 . Calculations of the sensitivity and specificity of the various screening procedures are shown in Table 2 . The predictive values of positive and negative test results are also shown in Table 2 .
|
|
CE
Of the 24 patients who underwent CE, 14 patients (58%) had PAVMs
confirmed at PA. In one patient (patient 23), CE was not performed
because the PAVM was diagnosed on chest radiograph. Contrast intensity
at CE prior to PA could be evaluated in 23 patients; in 1 patient, the
CE videotape unfortunately was lost. Five of the patients with PAVM
demonstrated at PA (38%) were rated as having grade 4 intensity of
contrast, whereas none of the patients with normal PA findings were so
rated. The sensitivity of CE could not be evaluated from the present
study because PA was not offered to patients with negative CE results.
Chest Radiography
PAVMs could be diagnosed on chest radiographs in only 9 of the 15
patients with PAVMs on PA. Of the six patients with PAVMs on PA and
negative chest radiographs, three had PAVMs with feeding vessels > 3
mm demonstrated at PA. All 10 patients with normal PA findings had
normal chest radiographs. When PA is considered the "gold standard"
for identification of PAVMs, the sensitivity of chest radiographs was
60% while the specificity was 100%.
Pulse Oximetry
In nine patients (36%), SaO2
was abnormal (eight patients had values < 96% in at least one
position; in patient 5, the values changed by 2%, from 100% to 98%,
on changing posture). All eight patients with a low
SaO2 had PAVMs diagnosed via PA,
while the patient with high values but a 2% fall on posture change had
normal PA findings. Among the patients with normal
SaO2, seven had PAVMs demonstrated at
PA. The sensitivity of pulse oximetry was 53% and the specificity was
90%. Figure 1
shows the distribution of SaO2 values
in the supine position. The results obtained in the upright position
were comparable.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study was designed to evaluate different screening procedures. For initial screening, we used CE, which is highly sensitive and therefore is believed to identify all PAVMs.15 16 17 18 19 20 Patients with negative findings on CE were, for ethical reasons, not investigated further. A number of patients with positive findings on CE declined referral for PA, either because they had no pulmonary symptoms at all or because their general health was poor. Because of selection bias, the prevalence of PAVM demonstrated by PA in the present study is not representative of the prevalence of PAVM in HHT patients in general.
PA is used to identify embolizable PAVMs and, from a therapeutic standpoint, PA can be considered a reference method. PA findings, including all demonstrated PAVMs, were chosen as the gold standard in the calculations of sensitivity and specificity. However, widespread, diffuse minute PAVMs, which may cause significant shunt but cannot be identified with PA, have been described.21 22 23 Thus, even PA cannot be considered the ultimate reference for identification of PAVM. This may very well explain why 10 of our patients had positive findings on CE and a measurable shunt, even though PAVM was not demonstrated by PA. Of the 15 patients in whom at least one PAVM was demonstrated, 12 patients had PAVMs with feeding vessels >3 mm. Embolization was recommended and subsequently carried out in our institution.24
Available methods for shunt detection include radioisotope angiography with labeled microspheres,25 measurement of oxygen saturation with pulse oximetry, arterial blood gas analysis,12 13 21 22 and CE.26 27 They are all minimally invasive and can be performed on an outpatient basis. The disadvantage is that the shunt size and the morphology are not described. CE is the only shunt-detecting method that can differentiate between a cardiac and a pulmonary shunt.
Since the late 1960s, it has been well documented that microbubbles introduced in a peripheral vein produce intracardiac ultrasonic contrast.15 16 In the present study, we used Hemaccel, which is a well-established contrast agent.16 28 29 30 When echo contrast is injected into a peripheral vein in healthy subjects, microbubbles > 8 µm are sieved by the pulmonary capillaries, whereas smaller microbubbles dissolve in the pulmonary circulation before they reach the left side of the heart,17 18 19 20 making CE a highly sensitive screening procedure for the detection of PAVM.15 In two studies of children with heart disease, PAVM was diagnosed in 2 of 889 patients and 18 of 82 patients, respectively.23 31 PAVM was diagnosed in 3 of 167 adults studied with transesophageal CE to assess patency of foramen ovale.32 No false-positive outcomes were reported in any of these studies.
In the present study, we correlated the intensity of echo contrast with the results of PA. Patients with PAVMs did seem to have a higher contrast intensity, and all five patients who had grade-4 contrast intensity had PAVMs demonstrated at PA. However, the rating of contrast intensity is not an objective parameter and can only be used semiquantitatively. PAVM was not verified at PA in 42% of our patients who had positive CE findings; these patients represent false-positive test results with respect to the need for therapy. The majority of these patients had reduced PaO2 while breathing either room air or 100% oxygen, and their positive CE findings are probably related to microscopic arteriovenous malformations.
In clinical practice, when dealing with a population at high risk of potentially hazardous complications, it is very important to use a highly sensitive method to exclude those patients who are not at risk from undergoing further and more invasive procedures. Because all patients with significant PAVMs are likely to be identified by CE,15 this procedure seems to fulfill this criterion.
Pulse oximetry with the patient breathing room air has the advantage of being easily applicable, even at home. The disadvantage is that patients with hypoxemia from causes other than pulmonary shunting have false-positive test results with respect to PAVM. Furthermore, false-negative test results are common because the development of PAVM may be a regional phenomenon, and the impact of regional arterial desaturation may be blunted by the mixture of blood from other parts of the lungs.23 With the SaO2 cut-off value used in the present study, 96%, we failed to diagnose PAVMs in seven patients.
Because PAVMs are typically located in the basal parts of the pulmonary circulation, a decrease in PaO2 caused by PAVM is most pronounced in the upright position in the majority of patients.21 33 Posture-related changes in SaO2 were observed in only five patients; in one of them, PAVM was not detected by PA, whereas the other four (patients 4, 8, 14, and 21) had large PAVMs in the lower lobes. In the majority of patients, we did not observe large variations in SaO2 on changing posture.
Our results indicated a high sensitivity of PaO2 measurements with the patients breathing 100% oxygen, because all patients with PAVMs were identified. However, the rather high cut-off value of 500 mm Hg also produced many false-positive results. The results of room-air PaO2 measurements were compared with an age-adjusted reference value.9 The screening failed to diagnose PAVM in four patients, and embolotherapy was recommended for all four. Evaluation of the results obtained in the upright position did not alter the conclusion. The discomfort of arterial puncture and the low specificity may disqualify room-air PaO2 measurements as an initial screening procedure.
Measurement of shunt size was performed just prior to PA with the patient in the supine position. In previous shunt studies using the 100% oxygen method, the venous oxygen content was estimated.6 14 34 In the present study, mixed venous blood could be sampled in the pulmonary artery, allowing a more precise shunt calculation. We calculated the shunt assuming that there was no alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference. All 25 patients had shunts > 5%, although PAVMs were demonstrated at PA in only 15 patients. These results indicate that small PAVMs, which cannot be demonstrated by means of PA, may be common in HHT patients. The significance of the microscopic shunts needs further investigation. The present study gave no indication as to whether a small PAVM will increase in size over the long term, or whether patients with microscopic PAVMs have an increased risk of paradoxical embolus, either bacterial or bland thrombus. These issues also need further study.
The degree of dyspnea was recorded according to the NYHA classification.8 The severity of self-reported dyspnea did not correlate very well with the size of the shunt or with the measured PaO2. These findings may partly be explained by the fact that patients with PAVM are used to having a reduced physical capacity. Three of the four patients who reported severe dyspnea had PAVMs. The degree of self-reported dyspnea has limited relevance in screening for PAVM.
Standard chest radiographs may demonstrate PAVM as a pulmonary mass connected by enlarged arteries and veins. Unfortunately, many PAVMs remain undetected by this method because they are located posteriorly in the lung behind the diaphragm, or they may be hidden in the hilar region.35 In such cases, the diagnosis may be difficult, even for skilled radiologists.10 Furthermore, the malformation may resemble, and be mistaken for, a neoplasm or a tuberculoma.36 In one of our patients, chest radiographic findings had previously been misinterpreted as cancer at the referring hospital; the diagnosis was corrected at the university hospital. In the present study, the sensitivity of the chest radiograph was only 60%: the PAVM diagnosis was missed in six patients even though the radiographs were evaluated by a specialist in radiology on the look out for PAVM. With these results, we could not confirm the results from an earlier Dutch study6 in which the results of PA and chest radiography were compared in 98 HHT patients, and the sensitivity and specificity of standard chest radiography were 83.3% and 91.7%, respectively. Therefore, we recommend that a negative findings on chest radiograph in an HHT patient should be followed by more sensitive screening procedures.
Helical CT scanning seems to a be very promising method in establishing the PAVM diagnosis.37 38 39 Helical CT scanning was not considered in the present study, because it was not available at our institution at that time. The screening procedures recommended are shown in Figure 4 .
|
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: CE = contrast echocardiography; HHT = hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia; NYHA = New York Heart Association; PA = pulmonary angiography; PAVM = pulmonary arteriovenous malformation; SaO2 = arterial oxygen saturation
Received for publication October 22, 1998. Accepted for publication February 25, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. W. Morrell Screening for Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2004; 169(9): 978 - 979. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Cottin, H. Plauchu, J.-Y. Bayle, M. Barthelet, D. Revel, and J.-F. Cordier Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations in Patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2004; 169(9): 994 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Aseni, M Vertemati, E Minola, and E Bonacina Massive haemoptysis after living donor liver transplantation J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 56(11): 876 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A J Easey, G M F Wallace, J M B Hughes, J E Jackson, W J Taylor, and C L Shovlin Should asymptomatic patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) be screened for cerebral vascular malformations? Data from 22 061 years of HHT patient life J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2003; 74(6): 743 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Gossage The Role of Echocardiography in Screening for Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 320 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. Lee, A. F. Graham, R. A. Pugash, S. J. Hutchison, P. Grande, R. H. Hyland, and M. E. Faughnan Contrast Echocardiography Remains Positive After Treatment of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 351 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M E Begbie, G M F Wallace, and C L Shovlin Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome): a view from the 21st century Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2003; 79(927): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Faughnan, R. H. Hyland, K. Nanthakumar, D. A. Redelmeier, A. D. Kjeldsen, and H. Oxhoj Screening in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Patients Chest, August 1, 2000; 118(2): 566 - 567. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G M F Wallace and C L Shovlin A hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia family with pulmonary involvement is unlinked to the known HHT genes, endoglin and ALK-1 Thorax, August 1, 2000; 55(8): 685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |