|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Second Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Kano, Yajima, Koyama, Marumo, and Hiroe), and the Department of Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Koike), Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to: Akira Koike, MD, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 545 Yushima 1-chome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Thirteen normal subjects (mean [± SD] age, 59 ± 8 years old) performed two levels (25 W and 50 W) of mild-intensity, constant-work-rate exercise for 6 min on a cycle ergometer. Left ventricular function was monitored continuously during the recovery from exercise using a computerized cadmium telluride detector.
Results: An overshoot was observed in the ejection fraction during the first minute of recovery compared with the end-exercise value. The overshoot in the ejection fraction during recovery after the 50-W exercise was greater than that seen after the 25-W exercise. An overshoot phenomenon in stroke volume was also observed during the recovery from 50-W exercise.
Conclusions: The overshoot in cardiac function observed during the early phase of recovery, which was caused mainly by an immediate decrease in end-systolic volume, occurred even after exercise of mild intensity. This phenomenon appears to suggest the existence of a transient mismatch between cardiac contractility and afterload reduction during the recovery from mild-intensity exercise, even in normal subjects.
Key Words: ejection fraction mild-intensity exercise overshoot phenomenon stroke volume
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We continuously monitored cardiac function after two levels of submaximal mild-intensity exercise performed at a constant work-rate in normal subjects. Our objectives included the following: (1) to determine whether the overshoot phenomenon of cardiac function during the recovery from exercise occurs in a subject even without significant heart disease; and (2) to evaluate whether this phenomenon depends on the intensity of exercise.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The protocol for the study was approved by our institutional committee on clinical studies. The nature and purpose of this study were explained to each subject, and each consented to participate in the study.
Exercise Protocol
An electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (model WLP-450;
Load; Groningen, the Netherlands) was used in an upright position for
the exercise tests. All subjects performed two repetitions of 25-W and
50-W constant-work-rate exercise each for 6 min and each started from
rest. Thus, each subject consecutively performed four tests on the same
day: (1) 25-W exercise; (2) 50-W exercise; (3) 25-W exercise; and (4)
50-W exercise. Each test was followed by a rest period of approximately
30 min. Pedaling was terminated immediately after the exercise was
completed. Thereafter, the subjects remained seated on the bicycle for
3 min. The heart rate was continuously monitored using a stress
analyzer (Case II; Marquette Medical Systems; Milwaukee, WI).
Cuff BP was also determined every minute during the test with an
automatic indirect manometer (model STBP-680; Collin Denshi; Aichi,
Japan).8
The resting cardiac output was measured three times repeatedly before exercise. It was measured in the seated position by means of the dye dilution method with indocyanine green9 and by an ear photoelectric transducer. The output of the latter was analyzed with a cardiac output computer (model MLC-4200; Nihon-Kohden; Tokyo, Japan). We used the mean value of three measurements for the following calculations.
Monitoring of Left Ventricular Function
As previously described,4
10
11
12
a computerized
cardiac monitoring system (model RRG-670; Aloka Co Ltd; Tokyo, Japan)
was used for the continuous monitoring of left ventricular function
throughout the test until 3 min of recovery. This system was composed
of a cadmium telluride (CdTe) detector (model A-116; Radiation
Monitoring Devices; Boston, MA), a preamplifier unit, a portable data
acquisition unit, and a central processing unit (model PC-9801; NEC;
Tokyo, Japan). After the patient's red blood cells were labeled with
30 mCi of 99mTc by the semi-in vivo
method, the CdTe detector was positioned over the left ventricular
region of interest, which was chosen as the position with the maximal
ratio of stroke counts (end-diastolic counts minus end-systolic counts)
to average counts (end-diastolic counts plus end-systolic counts
divided by 2). Care was taken to avoid the right ventricle, left
atrium, and pulmonary vasculature.
Data Analysis
The microcomputer calculated and displayed the counts over the
region of interest during the cardiac cycle at 50-ms intervals
throughout the test.13
Before the CdTe detector was
positioned, a correction factor for background activity was determined
in all subjects by measuring the resting ejection fraction using a
first-pass technique. The ejection fraction determined by using the
first-pass technique showed the best correlation with the ejection
fraction, as determined by the CdTe detector, when the background
activity of the CdTe was assumed to be 79% of the end-diastolic
counts. The left ventricular ejection fraction was therefore calculated
with 79% of the end-diastolic counts as the background activity, as
follows: EF = SC / (0.21 x EDC) where
EF is ejection fraction, SC is stroke counts (end-diastolic counts
minus end-systolic counts), and EDC is end-diastolic counts.
Along with the ejection fraction derived by a CdTe detector, the resting stroke volume, which was calculated from the cardiac output using the dye dilution method, was used to calculate the absolute values of stroke volume during the recovery from exercise.4 11 12 Accordingly, we calculated stroke volume during the test by measuring the change in the ejection fraction from rest along with the resting stroke volume.4 11 12 After the test, absolute values of ejection fraction, stroke volume, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and cardiac output throughout the test were determined every 10 s.4 11 12 For both the 25-W and 50-W exercise, 10 s of data from each of the two repetitions were time aligned at the end of exercise and were superimposed to average the random noise and enhance the underlying pattern of response.
Variables of cardiac function at rest were determined as the average of 2 min of measurements with the subject sitting on the ergometer before he started the exercise.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean (± SD). Comparisons of hemodynamic
variables at rest and those after 6 min of exercise were made by paired
t test. Changes in cardiac function during exercise recovery
were compared every 10 s by analysis of variance for repeated
measures. When this test was significant, individual comparisons of
end-exercise value (recovery time, 0) and values during 3 min of
recovery were made by Duncan's multiple-range test. A p value < 0.05
was accepted as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
During Recovery
The change in cardiac function during recovery from 50-W exercise
in one subject is shown in Figure 1
. The heart rate and cardiac output quickly recovered after exercise,
and almost reached pre-exercise resting values during the 3 min of
recovery. However, the ejection fraction and stroke volume increased
abruptly during the first minute of recovery, showing an overshoot
phenomenon.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, each subject completed two repetitions of 25-W and 50-W exercise. The data were superimposed to average the random noise and to enhance the underlying response pattern. Our findings contrast with those of previous reports. Plotnick et al16 evaluated the hemodynamic changes during recovery after maximal upright bicycle exercise in 56 normal subjects (age, 25 to 70 years old). However, those investigators did not observe a clear overshoot phenomenon in the ejection fraction or the stroke volume during the recovery from exercise. This was, in part, because of a lack of continuous measurement of cardiac function. They measured cardiac function at only two points during recovery; the first was at 2 to 4.5 min, and the second was at 4.5 to 7 min, after the cessation of exercise. In the present study, because the overshoot in the ejection fraction and stroke volume during recovery was more apparent after 50-W exercise compared with 25-W exercise, there should have been a more clear overshoot phenomenon after the maximal exercise, provided that the change in cardiac function was measured continuously.
The overshoot phenomenon has been reported to occur in cardiac patients several minutes after maximal exercise. In contrast, we noted this phenomenon within the first minute of exercise recovery in normal subjects. The discrepancy may be attributed to the severity of heart disease or to the intensity of the imposed exercise.
The overshoot of stroke volume observed during the recovery from 50-W exercise would result mainly from a sudden decrease in end-systolic volume (Fig 4) . Cardiovascular function during recovery after exercise is controlled by several factors, including sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems and production of nitric oxide.17 18 19 20 Watson et al17 noted that, after maximal exercise, the peak plasma level of norepinephrine was attained at 108 s postexercise recovery. Perini et al18 demonstrated that during 50 s of recovery from moderate- to high-intensity exercise, blood norepinephrine concentration did not start to decrease, maintaining a similar level as that attained during the maximal exercise. Thereafter, norepinephrine concentration decreased exponentially. Thus, a high level of norepinephrine during the early period of recovery might have played an important role in the overshoot of cardiac function. Nitric oxide is assumed to play a significant role in vasodilation during exercise.20 Exhaled nitric oxide output increases proportionally with exercise intensity and decreases rapidly during recovery.20 Therefore, the rapidity of the decrease in nitric oxide production might have also contributed to the time course of cardiac function, ie, the overshoot phenomenon. Because the levels of norepinephrine and nitric oxide become higher in proportion to the exercise intensity, it can be expected that the overshoot phenomenon would become more apparent after high-intensity exercise than after low-intensity exercise.
Because the rapidity of recovery of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve activity and that of nitric oxide production are likely to be influenced by age, the overshoot of cardiac function may also be related to age. However, a significant overshoot of ejection fraction after the 50-W exercise was noted in both younger and older subgroups in the present study. Foster et al21 have also reported an overshoot phenomenon of ejection fraction during recovery from maximal exercise in young normal subjects (30.6 ± 7.6 years old).
The overshoot in cardiac function during the early phase of recovery, which was mainly caused by an immediate decrease in end-systolic volume, occurred in normal subjects even after exercise of mild intensity. This phenomenon seems to suggest the presence of a transient mismatch between cardiac contractility and afterload reduction during the recovery from exercise, even in normal subjects. Further study of young subjects is necessary to determine whether the overshoot in cardiac function observed after mild-intensity exercise is an age-related phenomenon.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.
Received for publication March 17, 1998. Accepted for publication December 30, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. W. Roest, A. de Roos, H. J. Lamb, W. A. Helbing, J. G. van den Aardweg, J. Doornbos, E. E. van der Wall, and P. Kunz Tetralogy of Fallot: Postoperative Delayed Recovery of Left Ventricular Stroke Volume after Physical Exercise--Assessment with Fast MR Imaging Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 278 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |