|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Institute of Respiratory Diseases (Drs. Fulgoni, Zoia, Corsico, Beccaria, and Cerveri), and Department of Pediatrics (Drs. Georgiani and Bossi), IRCCS Policlinico "S. Matteo," University of Pavia, Italy.
Correspondence to: Isa Cerveri, MD, Istituto Forlanini, IRCCS, Policlinico "S. Matteo," Universita di Pavia, via Taramelli 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy; e-mail: isa{at}mbox.systemy.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Cross-sectional study conducted at least 3 years after cessation of therapy.
Setting: Outpatient pneumology department of the University Hospital.
Patients: Forty-four subjects (age range at observation, 6 to 23 years): 21 treated only with intensive Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM)-type chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ALL (group A), and 23 treated with chemotherapy plus BMT (group B).
Measurements: A detailed history of smoking habit, respiratory symptoms, and diseases was recorded directly from the patients with the aid of their parents. A complete physical examination and lung function testing (lung volumes and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO]) were performed in all subjects.
Results: No patient reported acute or chronic respiratory symptoms or diseases. In group A patients, lung function was in the normal range, except for three subjects in whom there was an isolated impairment of DLCO. In group B patients, lung function was markedly impaired, with more than half the patients having an abnormal DLCO. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for FVC (p = 0.022) and DLCO (p = 0.004).
Conclusions: Intensive, BFM-type frontline chemotherapy is not associated with late pulmonary dysfunction; however, retreatment including BMT can frequently injure the lung. Thus, in patients who undergo BMT and whose life expectancy is long, careful monitoring of lung function and counseling about avoiding additional lung risk factors is recommended.
Key Words: acute lymphoblastic leukemia long-term lung function
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary toxicity is a well-recognized side effect of radiotherapy and some cytostatic drugs, such as busulphan,2 used in conditioning regimens for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). However, several other chemotherapeutic agents used in the frontline treatment of childhood ALL, eg, methotrexate and several alkylating agents, such as cyclophosphamide, may also affect pulmonary function.3 4 5 Moreover, in most series, upper and lower respiratory tract infections are very common during therapy, and some of these infections can have long-term respiratory sequelae.6
Available data on pulmonary function in long-term survivors of childhood ALL, treated with chemotherapy alone or followed by BMT, are poor and conflicting, probably because of the different criteria used to select and treat the patients.7 8 9 10 11 12 The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term lung function in patients cured from childhood ALL by either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus BMT.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Clinical Data Collection
The children in group A had been stratified and treated
according to the then current AIEOP-ALL 88 study: Five of 21 patients
were eligible for the standard risk protocol (8801), 11 of 21 for the
intermediate one (8802), and 5 of 21 were in the high-risk group
(8803). Treatment included Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM)-type
intensive polychemotherapy with prednisone (60
mg/m2 qd for 4 weeks), dexamethasone (10
mg/m2 qd for 3 weeks), vincristine (1.5
mg/m2 for 8 doses), anthracyclines (daunorubicin,
doxorubicin, 30 mg/m2 for 8 doses), alkylating
agents (cyclophosphamide, 1 g/m2 for 3 doses),
methotrexate (5 g/m2 given IV over 24 h, 4
courses IM weekly for 18 months), cytarabine (75
mg/m2 for 24 doses), L-asparaginase
(10,000 U/m2 for 12 doses), and antimetabolites
(6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, 25 to 50
mg/m2). The various treatment regimens for each
patient are summarized in Table 2
. Treatment directed at the CNS included extended intrathecal
chemotherapy, which was associated with cranial irradiation only in
high-risk patients (12 Gy if
2 years of age, or 18 Gy if > 2
years). The child who experienced testicular relapse received gonadal
and cranial irradiation and a second course of chemotherapy according
to protocol BFM-REZ 90.13
|
Respiratory Symptoms
The presence of cough and/or phlegm, dyspnea, and wheezing both
at rest and during exercise was recorded at follow-up appointments, the
details coming directly from the patients or from their parents.
Information on the entire period from when therapy was stopped was
obtained from clinical records; routinely, patients had been examined
about every 2 months after cessation of treatment.
Pulmonary Function Testing
Measurements of lung volumes were obtained by a water-sealed
spirometer (Pulmonet III; SensorMedics; Anaheim, CA). Measurements were
performed according to the European Community for Coal and Steel
statements16
and the American Thoracic Society
recommendations.17
The best of three FVC measurements was
recorded, as well as FEV1 and
FEV1/FVC ratio.
Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was determined using the single-breath method (Transferscreen-II; Jaeger; Wuerzburg, Germany) and corrected for hemoglobin content. Because the correction of DLCO for alveolar volume did not influence the results of our analysis, only uncorrected DLCO values are reported. Measurements were performed according to the European Community for Coal and Steel16 and American Thoracic Society18 guidelines. Because this test is more difficult and requires greater cooperation to perform than FVC, DLCO data are unavailable for six patients.
Functional data are expressed as an SD score [defined as (actual result - predicted values)/population SD] and are defined as pathologic when < -1.64, corresponding to less than the fifth percentile.19 Taking into account the pubertal stage of each subject evaluated using Tanners Method,20 the SD score was corrected according to the tables reported by Rosenthal et al.21 22 Reference values were those from a recent cross-sectional study on lung function in healthy school children, 4 to 19 years of age.21 22
Statistical Analysis
Students t test was used for comparing the
functional variables of the two groups of subjects. Values of
p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Ethics
All participants and the parents of the children < 18 years
old gave their written informed consent. The study was in accordance
with the Helsinki II declaration and was approved by the local medical
ethics committee of our hospital.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At examination, all patients were found to be free from any acute disease and, in particular, acute respiratory disease. No patient reported chronic respiratory symptoms. None of the patients was a smoker.
The mean and SD of the functional variables expressed as raw percent of predicted and as SD score are reported in Table 3 ; percentages of patients with SD scores still in the normal range but negative (between 0 and -1.64) and of those with clearly pathologic SD scores (< -1.64) for groups A and B are also reported. In group A, the mean values of all the functional variables were in the normal range; only three patients had an isolated impairment of DLCO. In group B, on the other hand, the mean values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC ratio were still in the normal range, although mean values of the SD scores for FVC and FEV1 were negative; in fact, there was a significant proportion of patients with negative values of SD scores for FVC and FEV1 (74% and 65%, respectively) and a few subjects with clearly pathologic values (9% and 9%, respectively). The mean value of SD score for DLCO in this group was clearly pathologic; indeed, 58% of subjects had an impairment of DLCO. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for FVC (p = 0.022) and for DLCO (p = 0.004).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results found in group A are in agreement with those of Turner-Gomes et al12 but not with the more recently published study of Nysom et al.11 The characteristics of our patients are similar to those of the patients included in both these studies. However, there is a large difference in the interval between stopping therapy and cross-sectional observation; in the study by Nysom et al,11 the patients received diagnoses between 1970 and 1990, whereas our patients received diagnoses between 1987 and 1994. The conflicting results can consequently be attributed to changes of therapeutic strategies over time. The authors themselves found that age at follow-up was significantly correlated with doses of the drugs and with lung function abnormalities, suggesting that they reflect changes in treatment protocols.
In the group of survivors treated with chemotherapy plus BMT, the frequent occurrence of lung function abnormalities and the absence of respiratory symptoms, even in the presence of marked reduction in lung volumes and in DLCO, is in substantial agreement with the results reported by Nysom et al7 and Jenney et al.10
The comparison between our two groups shows a completely different outcome in the long-term effects on lung function. Inasmuch as survivors who had undergone BMT were in second or third remission, having experienced medullary relapses, they had received a greater amount of chemotherapy than survivors without BMT; we cannot, therefore, disentangle the effect of chemotherapeutic drug toxicity from lung injury caused by BMT itself and its related treatments and complications.
Our study has some strengths over those published thus far: our patients had the same disease, the recruitment period was brief, the therapeutic protocols were homogeneous and up-to-date, the sample size was sufficiently large, and the two groups could be well separated. The weaknesses are that the study is cross-sectional and lacks baseline respiratory function data. We believe, however, that given the young age of our patients at diagnosis, it is unlikely that they already had abnormal respiratory function.
We can, therefore, conclude that first-line treatment of ALL with chemotherapy alone is safe insofar as its effects on pulmonary function are concerned; more aggressive treatment, including higher amounts of chemotherapy and BMT, can frequently damage the lungs. Thus, in patients who undergo BMT and whose life expectancy is now excellent, careful monitoring of lung function and counseling about avoiding additional risk factors (smoke, pollution, work exposure) is recommended, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms. New regimens devised to minimize long-term toxicity without compromising survival rates may be necessary for patients undergoing BMT.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by research project, IRCCS-Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia N.681RCR96/02.
Received for publication December 15, 1998. Accepted for publication April 28, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |