Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gülec, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oral, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gülec, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oral, D.
(Chest. 1999;116:1582-1586.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Bronchial Hyperreactivity in Patients With Mitral Stenosis Before and After Successful Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Valvulotomy*

Sadi Gülec, MD; Fatih Ertas, MD; Eralp Tutar, MD; Yavuz Demirel, MD; Remzi Karaoguz, MD; Kenan Omurlu, MD and Dervis Oral, MD

* From the Departments of Cardiology (Drs. Gülec, Ertas, Tutar, Karaoguz, Omurlu, and Oral) and Pulmonology (Dr. Demirel), Medical School of Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Correspondence to: Fatih Sinan Ertas, MD, Yazikiri-B sitesi, A-3 Blok, No: 23, 06530, Ümitköy/Ankara, Turkey; e-mail: ertas{at}dialup.ankara.edu.tr


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objectives: We aimed to identify the bronchial response to inhaled methacholine in patients with mitral stenosis (MS) and to clarify whether or not the bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is reversible after percutaneous mitral balloon valvulotomy (PBMV).

Patients and setting: Thirty patients with MS and 28 age-matched healthy control subjects were prospectively evaluated with pulmonary function tests and methacholine challenge. The productive concentration of methacholine causing 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20) was calculated and used as a parameter of bronchial responsiveness. BHR was defined as a PC20 < 8 mg/mL. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were recorded in all patients through a Swan-Ganz balloon-tipped catheter. Sixteen patients underwent PMBV, and a methacholine test was repeated after each procedure.

Results: Bronchial response to methacholine was significantly increased in patients with MS, so that 53% of them had BHR, whereas all control subjects were nonresponders. The PC20 was closely correlated with the PAP (r = - 0.777; p < 0.001), PCWP (r = - 0.723; p < 0.001), and mitral valve area (MVA; r = 0.676; p < 0.001). Balloon valvulotomy was successfully performed in all of the 16 patients, and the cardiac parameters (MVA, PAP, and PCWP) significantly improved after the procedure. In contrast, no significant changes were shown in pulmonary function test variables (total lung capacity, vital capacity [VC], FEV1, and FEV1/VC). Although significant improvement was observed in the mean PC20 values (from 4.97 ± 5.24 to 7.47 ± 6.96 mg/mL; p = 0.0006), BHR was completely eliminated in only one patient.

Conclusions: Our data shows that BHR is fairly common among patients with MS, and severity of bronchial responsiveness is significantly correlated with the severity of MS. Moreover, PMBV leads to significant reduction in pulmonary congestion and a consequent improvement in BHR.

Key Words: bronchial hyperactivity • mitral stenosis • percutaneous transluminal mitral valvulotomy


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bronchial asthma is defined as hyperreactivity of the bronchi to a wide variety of stimuli.1 Characteristic symptoms of this pulmonary disorder are cough, wheezing, and acute episodic dyspnea. On the other hand, these symptoms are frequently observed in patients with chronic lung congestion due to heart disease.2 Recently, investigators reported bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) to inhaled methacholine in patients with chronic left ventricular failure (LVF),3 4 5 and mitral valve disease (MVD).6 Interstitial lung edema,6 airway edema,4 dilatation of the bronchial vessel,3 and decreased airway caliber5 were suggested as possible mechanisms of BHR in cardiac patients. However, whether or not this BHR is reversible by reducing pulmonary congestion is still not clear.5 7 In the present study, we measured bronchial responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in 30 patients with mitral stenosis (MS) and 28 healthy control subjects. Furthermore, a subgroup of 16 patients underwent percutaneous mitral balloon valvulotomy (PMBV), and a methacholine test was repeated after each procedure. Thus, we had the opportunity to test the hypothesis that reduction of pulmonary congestion might improve BHR.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Population
We prospectively studied 30 consecutive patients with MS who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology at Ankara University Medical School between July 1, 1996, and July 1, 1997. Twenty-eight age-matched (within 3 years) healthy physicians were studied as control subjects. Clinical and laboratory criteria for exclusion of the patients and control subjects were as follows: (1) cigarette smoking within the preceding 10 years; (2) history or present status of bronchial asthma and/or other pulmonary disorders; (3) recent (within 8 weeks) airway infection; (4) FEV1 < 80% of vital capacity (VC); (5) moderate to severe mitral regurgitation; and (6) left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < 55%). All patients were clinically stable, and most of them were receiving medical treatment with digitalis (13 patients), diuretics (19 patients), or calcium antagonists (7 patients; diltiazem or verapamil) at the time of enrollment. Informed consent was obtained from each subject in the study.

Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Evaluation
Comprehensive two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examinations were performed in all patients using an ultrasound imager (model SSH-160A; Toshiba; Tokyo, Japan) with a 3.5-MHz transducer. The mitral valve area (MVA) was measured by way of a planimetric method, whereas mitral regurgitation was semiquantitatively assessed using color-flow Doppler echocardiography as described previously.8 Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography.9 Mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were recorded through a Swan-Ganz balloon-tipped catheter within a week before the methacholine inhalation test.

PMBV
Nineteen patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms and/or moderate to severe MS (MVA < 1.5 cm2) were considered as possible candidates for PMBV. Three patients were further excluded because of unfavorable valve morphology for balloon valvulotomy. Thus, 16 patients underwent PMBV by way of a transseptal approach, as described by Inoue et al.10 Successful valvulotomy was defined as an MVA > 1.5 cm2 in the absence of complications including severe mitral regurgitation (greater than second degree) and/or a large atrial septal defect (> 1.5:1 left-to-right shunt).

Pulmonary Function Tests and Methacholine Challenge
Total lung capacity (TLC), VC, and FEV1 were obtained in all patients using computer-assisted spirometry (model 2400; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA). All medication was stopped 48 h before the beginning of the methacholine challenge. Methacholine was dissolved in physiologic saline solution to make solutions of 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 16.0, and 32.0 mg/mL. The saline and methacholine solutions were inhaled from a nebulizer (model 646; DeVilbiss Health Care; Somerset, PA) operated by compressed air at 5 L/min. Saline solution was inhaled first for 2 min, and the FEV1 was measured. If the change in FEV1 from the baseline after inhalation of saline solution was <= 10%, inhalation of methacholine was started. Methacholine solution was inhaled for 2 min under tidal breathing with a nose clip, and this was followed immediately by spirometry. Twofold incremental concentrations were given until a fall of >= 20% in FEV1 was noted. The productive concentration of methacholine causing 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20) was calculated and used as a parameter of bronchial responsiveness. BHR was defined as a PC20 < 8 mg/mL.11 In 16 patients, pulmonary function tests and methacholine challenge were repeated 2 to 4 days after PMBV (4 to 7 days apart from the first test). Methacholine challenges in one patient were performed at the same time of day to avoid circadian differences in reactivity.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Intergroup comparisons of discrete variables were performed using the Student’s t test. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and simple linear regression, using the least-squares method, were performed to test the correlation between PC20 and cardiac and pulmonary function parameters. Results with a p value < 0.05 were considered significant.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Population
Thirty patients with MS (24 were female, and 6 were male) and 28 control subjects (20 were female, and 8 were male) were included in this study. The mean ± SD age of the patients and control subjects were 38.3 ± 10.2 years and 36.9 ± 9.1 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in age or sex between patients and control subjects.

Cardiopulmonary Function
The results of baseline cardiopulmonary function tests and methacholine challenge are summarized in Table 1 . Echocardiographic evaluation revealed that 10 patients had mild MS (MVA >= 1.5 cm2), 14 patients had moderate MS (MVA < 1.5 cm2 and > 1 cm2), and 6 patients had severe MS (MVA <= 1 cm2). All patients had good left ventricular systolic function as a measure of LVEF (64.6 ± 11.8%). Hemodynamic data demonstrated elevated values for PAP and PCWP in the MS group: 29.6 ± 8.6 mm Hg and 20.8 ± 6.4 mm Hg, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Cardiac and Pulmonary Function Parameters of Study Population

 
The mean values for TLC, VC, and FEV1 were significantly lower in MS patients compared with normal control subjects, whereas the FEV1/VC did not significantly differ among the two groups. Results of the methacholine inhalation test showed that the mean value for PC20 in the 30 patients with MS (9.22 ± 8.19 mg/mL) was significantly lower than that in the 22 control subjects (46.14 ± 12.87 mg/mL; p < 0.0001). In six of the control subjects (21%), however, the PC20 could not be calculated with the doses of methacholine used. Sixteen of the 30 patients with MS (53%) were found to have BHR (PC20 < 8 mg/mL), whereas all of the control subjects had a normal response to methacholine. A subgroup analysis showed that all patients with BHR had either moderate or severe MS (MVA < 1.5 cm2). Although the patients with mild MS had significantly lower PC20 values than the control subjects (15.62 ± 6.81 mg/mL vs 46.14 ± 12.87 mg/mL; p < 0.0001), none of them had PC20 values < 8 mg/mL.

Correlation analyses between PC20 and cardiac and pulmonary function parameters are shown in Table 2 . There were strong inverse correlations between PC20 and PAP (r = - 0.777; p < 0.001), and PC20 and PCWP (r = - 0.723; p < 0.001). In addition, significant positive correlations were exhibited between PC20 and MVA (r = 0.676; p < 0.001), PC20 and FEV1 (r = 0.381; p = 0.038), and PC20 and FEV1/VC (r = 0.373; p = 0.04). None of the other cardiopulmonary parameters including LVEF, VC, and TLC were significantly correlated with PC20.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. The Relationship Between PC20 and Cardiac and Pulmonary Function Parameters in 30 Patients With MS*

 
Effect of PMBV on Cardiac and Pulmonary Function Parameters
Balloon valvulotomy was successfully performed in all of the 16 patients. After PMBV, cardiac parameters (MVA, PAP, and PCWP) significantly improved (Table 3 ). In contrast, no significant changes were shown in pulmonary function test variables (TLC, VC, FEV1, and FEV1/VC; Table 4 ). Although significant improvement was observed in the mean PC20 values after the PMBV (from 4.97 ± 5.24 to 7.47 ± 6.96 mg/mL; p = 0.0006), BHR was not completely eliminated in any, except one patient (Table 5 and Fig 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Effect of PMBV on Cardiac Parameters in Patients With MS*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Effect of PMBV on Pulmonary Function Parameters in Patients With MS*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Effect of PMBV on Bronchial Response to Methacholine in Patients With MS*

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Individual bronchial response to methacholine in 16 patients with MS before and after successful PMBV. The PC20 improved in all patients except for patient 7. LOG = logarithm.

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Summary of Study Results
In the current study, we demonstrated that bronchial response to methacholine is significantly increased in patients with MS, so that 53% of them had BHR. In addition, we found that PC20 was closely correlated with MVA, PAP, and PCWP, suggesting that the severity of BHR is significantly associated with the severity of MS. Moreover, we observed significant improvement in PC20 after successful PMBV. This finding confirms the hypothesis that a reduction of pulmonary congestion might improve bronchial response to methacholine in patients with MS.

Comparison With Results From Other Studies
It is well known that the reaction of normal populations to methacholine is somewhat variable. This is due to the fact that uniform standardization of methodology has not been achieved.12 Hargreave et al11 defined the subjects with a PC20 < 8 mg/mL as responders and the subjects with a PC20 > 8 mg/mL as nonresponders. On the other hand, Wanger12 and Malo et al13 reported that normal individuals do not have PC20 values < 16 mg/mL of methacholine. In the present study, we defined BHR by way of Hargreave et al.11 However, we noted that none of our normal subjects had PC20 values < 16 mg/mL.

There have been many reports of BHR in patients with LVF4 5 14 and MVD,6 7 but how a patient’s bronchial responsiveness was increased remains controversial. Rolla et al6 and Nishimura et al7 reported a significant inverse correlation between bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and PCWP in patients with MVD. Accordingly, they suggested that pulmonary congestion and/or edema might contribute to BHR in cardiac patients. However, Eichacker and coworkers15 failed to observe BHR in seven of nine patients with severe LVF, despite a remarkable increase in PCWP (27 mm Hg). In the current study, chronic lung congestion is the most conceivable explanation for the increased bronchial responsiveness, since we excluded the other factors (COPD, atopy, recent airway infection, smoke, and drugs) that may influence bronchial response to methacholine. Furthermore, the close correlation between PCWP and PC20 (r = - 0.723; p < 0.001) strengthens the possibility of a link between interstitial lung edema and bronchial responsiveness in our patients. In experimental studies, it has been demonstrated that pulmonary edema stimulates unmyelinated C-fiber nerve endings, in lung parenchyma (J or juxtacapillary endings)16 17 and in bronchi.18 Then, these forms of afferent stimulation causes reflex narrowing of large and small airways. Moreover, Kikuchi et al19 showed that in dogs pulmonary congestion made the BHR through vagal reflexes by narrowing of peripheral airways.

Another subject of interest is whether or not BHR secondary to heart disease is reversible by reducing pulmonary congestion. Pison et al5 could not observe a significant improvement in bronchial responsiveness after 5 to 15 days of intensive diuretic therapy in 12 patients with acute decompensation of LVF. They speculated that incomplete treatment might be responsible for the lack of improvement in bronchial responsiveness, since radiologic signs of cardiac failure were still present after diuretic therapy. On the other hand, Nishimura et al7 noted a significant improvement in bronchial responsiveness of patients with MVD after mitral valve replacement. They reported that most of their patients, however, remained hyperreactive to methacholine despite the disappearance of interstitial lung edema. The remaining BHR in their patients might be partly attributed to cigarette smoking, since more than one third of them were heavy smokers. However, in a nonsmoking community, we also found that BHR was not completely eliminated after PMBV in any, except one patient. Thus, the increase in bronchial responsiveness that we observed in MS patients could not be explained by interstitial edema alone. Previous investigations suggested that chronic edema of the bronchial wall may lead to a substantial increase in BHR as a result of geometric narrowing in the airway.14 20 21 Furthermore, Cabanes et al 3 and Moreno et al22 reported that thickening of bronchial walls might also cause hyperresponsiveness as well as bronchial narrowing.

In summary, our study demonstrated that BHR is fairly common in patients with MS, as a result of pulmonary congestion due to the obstruction at the pulmonary outflow. Balloon dilatation of the mitral valve leads to significant reduction in pulmonary congestion and a consequent improvement in bronchial responsiveness. However, BHR was not completely eliminated in most of the patients. Taken together with the previous investigations, the remaining BHR might be attributed to factors such as airway edema,6 dilatation of the bronchial vessel,3 and decreased airway caliber,7 resulting from long-standing pulmonary congestion.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: BHR = bronchial hyperreactivity; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVF = left ventricular failure; MS = mitral stenosis; MVA = mitral valve area; MVD = mitral valve disease; PAP = pulmonary artery pressure; PC20 = productive concentration of methacholine causing 20% decrease in FEV1; PCWP = pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; PMBV = percutaneous mitral balloon valvulotomy; TLC = total lung capacity; VC = vital capacity

Received for publication October 20, 1998. Accepted for publication July 19, 1999.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. American Thoracic Society. Chronic bronchitis, asthma and pulmonary emphysema: a statement by the committee on diagnostic standards for nontuberculosis respiratory diseases. Am Rev Respir Dis 1962; 85:762–768
  2. Taquini, AC, Lozada, BB, Donaldson, RJ, et al (1953) Mitral stenosis and cor pulmonale. Am Heart J 46,639-648
  3. Cabanes, LR, Weber, SN, Matran, R, et al (1989) Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in patients with impaired left ventricular function. N Engl J Med 320,1317-1322[Abstract]
  4. Sasaki, F, Ishizaki, T, Mifune, J, et al (1990) Bronchial responsiveness in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Chest 97,534-538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Pison, C, Malo, JL, Rouleau, JL, et al (1989) Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine in subjects with chronic heart failure at a time of exacerbation and after increasing diuretic therapy. Chest 96,230-235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rolla, G, Bucca, C, Caria, E, et al (1990) Bronchial responsiveness in patients with MVD. Eur Respir J 3,127-131[Abstract]
  7. Nishimura, Y, Maeda, H, Yokoyama, M, et al (1990) Bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with mitral valve disease. Chest 98,1085-1090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Spain, MG, Smith, MD, Grayburn, PA, et al (1989) Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow imaging: angiographic and hemodynamic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 13,585-590[Abstract]
  9. Sahn, DJ, DeMaria, A, Kisslo, J, et al (1978) Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58,1072-1083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Inoue, K, Owaki, T, Nakamura, T, et al (1984) Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 87,394-402[Abstract]
  11. Hargreave, FE, Dolovich, J, Boulet, LP (1983) Inhalation provocation tests. Semin Respir Med 4,224-235
  12. Wanger, J (1992) Pulmonary function testing: a practical approach. Wanger, J eds. Methacholine and histamine bronchial provocation tests ,177-199 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD.
  13. Malo, JL, Pineau, L, Cartier, A, et al (1983) Reference values of the provocative concentrations of methacholine that cause 6% and 20% changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in a normal population. Am Rev Respir Dis 128,8-11[ISI][Medline]
  14. Snashall, PD, Chung, KF (1991) Airway obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in left ventricular failure and mitral stenosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 144,945-956[ISI][Medline]
  15. Eichacker, PQ, Seidelman, MJ, Rothstein, MS, et al (1988) Methacholine bronchial reactivity testing in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Chest 93,336-338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Paintal, AS (1970) The mechanism of excitation of type J-receptors and J reflex. Porter, R eds. Breathing: Hering-Breuer Centenary Symposium ,59-71 Churchill Livingstone London, UK.
  17. Coleridge, JCC, Coleridge, HM (1977) Afferent C-fibers and cardiorespiratory chemoreflexes. Am Rev Respir Dis 115,251-260[ISI][Medline]
  18. Roberts, AM, Bhattacharya, J, Schultz, HD, et al (1986) Stimulation of vagal afferent C-fibers by lung edema in dogs. Circ Res 58,512-22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kikuchi, R, Sekizawa, K, Sasaki, H, et al (1984) Effects of pulmonary congestion on airway reactivity to histamine aerosol in dogs. J Appl Physiol 57,1640-1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hogg, JC, Pare, PD, Moreno, R (1987) The effect of submucosal edema on airway resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis 135(suppl 6),S54-S56[ISI][Medline]
  21. Hulbert, WM, McLean, T, Hogg, C (1985) The effect of acute airway inflammation on bronchial reactivity in guinea pigs. Am Rev Respir Dis 132,7-11[ISI][Medline]
  22. Moreno, RH, Hogg, JC, Pare, PD (1986) Mechanics of airway narrowing. Am Rev Respir Dis 133,1171-1180[ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gülec, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oral, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gülec, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oral, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS