|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Critical Care Medicine Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Correspondence to: Frederick P. Ognibene, MD, FCCM, FACP, National Institutes of Health, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, Critical Care Medicine Department, Building 10, Room 7D43, 10 Center Dr MSC 1662, Bethesda, MD 20892-1662; e-mail: fognibene{at}nih.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: A retrospective case series.
Setting: The ICU of a 325-bed tertiary care research hospital.
Patients: Patients from 1 to 18 years of age who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL or transbronchial biopsy between June 1991 and December 1995 and received IV sedation and analgesia.
Interventions: None.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. Extracted data included anesthetics and sedatives used and their per kilogram dosages, procedure durations, and complications including oxygen desaturations < 90%, vital sign alterations that required intervention, and emergence reactions to ketamine.
Results: A total of 103 bronchoscopies were performed on 64
patients. Ketamine was used as the primary anesthetic in 60 procedures
(58%). A combination of fentanyl and midazolam was used in 38 of the
43 remaining procedures. A variety of combinations were used in the
five remaining procedures. Complications occurred in 13 procedures and
included oxygen desaturations, stridor, cough, apnea, and nasal
bleeding. Twelve of the 13 complications occurred in patients with a
diagnosis of HIV infection. Eight of the13 complications involved
children
3 years of age.
Conclusions: Pediatric
bronchoscopy is a safe and valuable procedure. However, in this study,
anesthetic selection was shown to adversely affect the complication
rate in the subsets of children
3 years of age and with an
underlying diagnosis of HIV infection.
Key Words: anesthesia BAL bronchoscopy complications fentanyl ketamine midazolam pediatrics procedures pulmonary disease sedation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the three largest pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscopy series to date, two single institution studies with a total of > 2,500 procedures reported procedure-related complication rates of 3%.1 3 A large, multi-institutional European study of 51 centers that provided information on nearly 4,600 procedures reported complication rates in < 5% of the procedures in most of the centers.4 Although deaths related to the procedure do occur, they are rare.5 There are additional complications related to the procedure when BAL or transbronchial biopsy needs to be performed.
The relationship of complications to severity of illness has not been specifically expounded. Ultimately, a risk-benefit analysis by the operator is used to determine whether the procedure should be performed. However, other host factors, such as age, have been evaluated. The use of the fiberoptic flexible bronchoscope in infants, including those born prematurely, has been assessed.6 7 8 In these groups of patients, the procedure is often used to identify a malformation, to investigate a symptom such as stridor, or to identify complications arising from therapies in the neonatal period.
Sedation and anesthesia have been demonstrated to enhance the safety, technical ease, and comfort of many pediatric procedures.23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Sedation and anesthesia techniques for pediatric bronchoscopy have also been published.36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 The use of an inhalational anesthetic during fiberoptic bronchoscopy is useful in maintaining physiologic homeostasis during the endoscopic procedure.38 However, the potential contamination of the procedure room with anesthetic gases and the excessive occupational exposure to personnel may limit the usefulness of inhalational anesthetics.39 40 41 In addition, use of the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope has allowed the procedure to be moved out of the operating suite. It is now routinely performed in other clinical areas, where additional concerns about the scavenging of gases arise when using inhalational anesthetics. However, the description and systematic assessment of regimens of deep sedation and anesthesia without inhalational agents in pediatric flexible bronchoscopy outside of the operating room has not been previously presented.
In our institution, ketamine, typically in combination with sedatives or narcotics, is often used for analgesia and anesthesia in pediatric procedures.30 Ketamine has been shown in several large series to be a useful adjunct in the performance of pediatric procedures.26 27 29 30 33 34 However, in repetitive doses, ketamine can lead to the induction of general anesthesia, with its inherent potential for laryngospasm and anesthesia-related complications.23
Ketamine, with the addition of a benzodiazepine, has been used successfully for total IV anesthesia in adult patients undergoing endoscopy.46 The use of ketamine in pediatric bronchoscopy has been limited. A single case series of five patients was reported in 1974.42 This report highlighted the safety of ketamine in pediatric rigid bronchoscopy performed in the operating room. There are some technical differences between the rigid bronchoscope and the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope that may alter anesthetic selection. Most notably, the rigid bronchoscope is a hollow tube that allows ventilation to occur through its core. The flexible bronchoscope is a solid bundle of fibers around which the patient must breathe.1 In addition, there were two reports from the European literature that evaluated ketamine for IV anesthesia in the intubated pediatric bronchoscopy patient.43 44 Finally, one study evaluated the use of a combination of ketamine and diazepam in the nonintubated pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscopy patient. This study reports that a "serious" complication occurred in a single patient.45
More typically, sedation for pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscopy consists of a benzodiazepine with or without a narcotic. Midazolam and diazepam are two of the more common benzodiazepines used in the studies on pediatric bronchoscopy,1 3 4 9 22 whereas meperidine and fentanyl are two of the more common narcotics used for the procedure.1 3 4 9 Hypnotic agents such as chloral hydrate and droperidol as well as major tranquilizers such as chlorpromazine have also been used.6 13
Consequently, we decided to conduct a retrospective assessment of the complications associated with sedation for pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscopy that used the regimen of ketamine sedation and anesthesia, benzodiazepines, and narcotics in our institution.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
General exclusion criteria included the aforementioned intubated patients, patients with thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/µL) or severe hypoxemia (oxygen saturations of < 92% despite the use of supplemental oxygen).
Personnel
The medically responsible bronchoscopists were senior staff
physicians with credentials in critical care with additional training
in the management of the pediatric airway and the administration of
parenteral sedatives and anesthetics for the performance of pediatric
procedures. Each procedure was also performed in the presence of a
critical care physician in fellowship training, a designated nurse who
was responsible for patient monitoring and medication administration,
and a respiratory therapist, with additional qualifications in the
technique of bronchoscopy, who was present throughout the procedure to
provide technical support and assist with patient monitoring.
Bronchoscopy Procedures
Informed consent and assent were obtained before each procedure.
Institutional and departmental policies, developed in accordance with
the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the
American Thoracic Society, were adhered to for patient monitoring,
performance of bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsies, and
administration of anesthetics.15
35
The procedures were
performed with continuous cardiopulmonary monitoring, blow-by
aerosolized oxygen, and pulse oximetry. Patients had been without oral
intake for at least 6 h before the procedure, and all had
functional IV catheters in place.
Topical 1% lidocaine was applied to the posterior pharynx for local anesthesia. The lidocaine was delivered by a nebulizer attached to a simple face mask for children who were unable to cooperate with a hand-held nebulizer or atomizer. Lidocaine jelly was administered to the nares when a nasal approach was anticipated. Additional aliquots of 1% lidocaine were administered via the bronchoscope to the posterior pharynx, trachea, carina, and major bronchial divisions as the bronchoscope was advanced.
Sedation and anesthetic selection and dosage were determined by the bronchoscopist on the basis of the patients age, underlying disease, and physiologic status. They were administered in divided doses and titrated to the desired effects. Atropine, when given as an antisialagogue, was administered with the first doses of sedation. This often occurred while the topical anesthetics were being applied and the patient was being prepared for the procedure.
The bronchoscopy procedure was performed with either a 3.6- or 4.9-mm external diameter Olympus pediatric bronchoscope with video adaptor (Olympus America Incorporated; Melville, NY). BALs were performed with aliquots of 0.9% NaCl with the bronchoscope in the wedge position. Total amounts of 0.9% sodium chloride for lavage did not exceed 3 mL/kg. Transbronchial biopsies were performed under direct fluoroscopic guidance.
The procedures were terminated at the discretion of the senior bronchoscopist if there were oxygen desaturations below baseline that did not readily respond to removing the bronchoscope, manipulating the airway, or increasing the inspired oxygen concentration. In addition, increases in the work of breathing manifested as tachypnea, retractions, or nasal flaring, accessory breath sounds such as wheezing or stridor, vomiting, and the failure to attain adequate levels of sedation were all considered complications of the procedure.
Data Collection
This project was reviewed by the Office of Human Subjects
Research of the Office of Intramural Research, National Institutes of
Health. The investigators reviewed the charts. The weight, in
kilograms, of the patient at the time of each procedure was identified
from the chart. The drugs administered as well as their total doses
were identified from the order sheets and verified in the nurses
medication administration records. A dosage per kilogram of each drug
was calculated and tabulated. The total duration of the bronchoscopy
procedure was defined as the time from the first set of vital signs to
the time of transfer to the ward or clinic. Total duration was
identified from the notes of the dedicated nurse and recorded in
minutes. Per clinical protocol, at the time of transfer, the child was
awake, following commands, and able to take sips of liquid while
protecting his or her airway. Finally, the progress notes and nurses
notes were examined to identify whether any complications occurred
during the procedure or postbronchoscopy follow-up period and what
interventions were needed. Potential complications assessed in addition
to the procedure-related complications mentioned above were aspiration,
cough, rash, and the occurrence of an emergence reaction to ketamine.
Emergence reactions are drug-related psychological phenomena that occur
in some patients as the effects of ketamine are wearing off.
For the purpose of statistical analysis, each procedure was considered an independent event. As a result, demographic variables between groups were compared using the two-tailed Students t test. Primer of Biostatistics, a statistical software package (McGraw Hill; New York, NY), was used for computations.47 A p = 0.05 was used as the significance level in all circumstances.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forty-five patients had one bronchoscopy performed during the study period. Eleven patients had two bronchoscopic procedures performed. Four patients had three procedures, two patients had four procedures, and one patient had five procedures performed. One patient had 11 procedures performed.
Ketamine was used as the primary anesthetic in 60 of the procedures performed. Forty-five (75%) of these procedures used the combination of ketamine and midazolam for sedation. Fourteen procedures (23%) used other sedation combinations. In 11 of these 14 procedures, three drugs (ketamine, midazolam, and fentanyl) were given. Ketamine was used in combination with fentanyl in two procedures. Ketamine was used as single-drug therapy in an additional two procedures. Seventy percent of these ketamine procedures (n = 42) included pretreatment with atropine, in an appropriate dose based on weight, in an effort to decrease secretions and to prevent paradoxical vagal-mediated bradycardia.
The mean dose of ketamine was 1.9 ± 1.0 mg/kg (range, 0.5 to 6.4 mg/kg). The mean dose of midazolam, when used, was 0.07 ± 0.09 mg/kg (range, 0.01 to 0.15 mg/kg). In the 14 procedures that included fentanyl, a mean dose of 1.8 ± 1.7 µg/kg (range, 0.5 to 7.5 µg/kg) was used. All doses were given in divided aliquots and titrated to effect. The mean procedure duration was 178 ± 97 min (range, 30 to 515 min).
There were 43 procedures in which ketamine was not used as the primary anesthetic. In 38 of these 43 procedures (88%), the combination of fentanyl and midazolam was used for sedation. In the remaining five procedures, various combinations of medications were used. The combination of midazolam and morphine was used in two procedures, midazolam, fentanyl, and droperidol were used in one procedure, propofol alone was used in one procedure, and midazolam alone was used in one procedure. Premedication with atropine for the other regimens was not as common as when ketamine was used as the anesthetic; it was used in only one procedure. For regimens without ketamine, the mean dose of fentanyl was 2.2 ± 1.4 µg/kg (range, 1 to 5.5 µg/kg). The mean dose of midazolam, when used, was 0.07 ± 0.04 mg/kg (range, 0.01 to 0.15 mg/kg). These doses were also given in divided aliquots and titrated to effect. The mean procedure duration was 195 ± 163 min (range, 60 to 770 min).
The overall complication rate was 13% (n = 13). However, for drug combinations that included ketamine as the anesthetic, there were 12 complications. One complication occurred in a patient who received midazolam alone as the sedative. There were no complications in the patients who received the narcotic and benzodiazepine combinations. Table 1 lists the patient demographics, drug dosages of the sedation regimen, complications, and therapeutic interventions required for each of the 13 complications. Of the 12 complications that involved ketamine, all patients had been pretreated with atropine.
|
Of interest, 12 of the 13 procedures associated with complications
occurred in patients with HIV infection as the underlying diagnosis.
Eight of the 13 procedures (62%) in the complication group involved
children who were
3 years of age.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There has been considerable controversy in the adult bronchoscopy literature about whether sedation is useful.48 49 50 51 In general, pediatric endoscopists seem to agree about the usefulness of sedation in bronchoscopy. However, sedation for pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscopy has not been well scrutinized.
Sedation in bronchoscopy is unique from sedation for other procedures. First, the pathologic process to be diagnosed and treated is either in the tracheobronchial tree or the pulmonary parenchyma and may be altering the individuals ability to oxygenate and ventilate. Secondly, the bronchoscope is in the airway and may further compromise the patients ventilatory function. Transient coughing and desaturation occur in bronchoscopy procedures even in patients without significant tracheal or pulmonary disease. Finally, sedation, regardless of drug classification, may add another insult to a pulmonary system that may already be compromised.
The current study demonstrates how the complication rate associated
with the performance of pediatric bronchoscopy may be adversely
affected by the anesthetic selected. Ketamine was associated with
adverse events in 12 of the 60 bronchoscopy procedures (20%) in which
it was used. Most of these occurred in two subsets of patients:
patients with HIV infection and patients
3 years of age. The
smaller airway size or the severity of the underlying disease may be
factors contributing to the number of subsequent complications. In
contrast, narcotic and benzodiazepine combinations did not lead to any
adverse events.
Pharmacologic combinations have been used with success in our ICU for all types of pediatric sedation including pediatric bronchoscopy, but our results with ketamine as an anesthetic agent in pediatric bronchoscopy have not been uniformly successful. Our bronchoscopists often choose ketamine combinations for use in the younger bronchoscopy patient because of its amnestic, analgesic, and dissociative properties that allow for a more controlled procedure in this population. Older children will often be more amenable to calming and reassurance. Therefore the use of a narcotic and benzodiazepine combination will provide adequate sedation for these older patients in most instances.
In the majority of our study population, bronchoscopy was clinically indicated to diagnose pulmonary infections in an immunocompromised patient. This is different from most other general pediatric series in which the major indications for the procedure include the evaluation of stridor and wheezing and the assessment of airway anatomy and unresolved pneumonia.1 7 16 17 The severity of underlying disease may play a role in causing complications from any sedative or anesthetic.
It is not entirely clear why such a large proportion of HIV-infected patients (29%) experienced complications in our study. It is possible that the severity of lung disease or hypoxia before the procedure, in conjunction with ketamine anesthesia, may have contributed to the higher complication rate. Several other series,10 12 13 in which pediatric HIV-infected patients underwent bronchoscopy, have demonstrated at least six complications in a total population of 118 patients (5%). Many of the complications were similar to those seen in our series ie, tachypnea and transient problems with respiratory function. The patients in the other series received sedation including meperidine alone or in combination with promethazine and chlorpromazine. Nine of those patients were intubated before the bronchoscopy.
Another subset of patients that experienced complications in the
present study were those children
3 years of age. There were 16
patients
3 years of age, and all of these younger patients had the
primary diagnosis of HIV infection. Two studies12
13
have
focused on the younger AIDS patient (age range, 2 to 54 months). In
these two studies, six complications occurred in 45 (13%) patients.
The complications observed were similar to those in our population;
however, narcotics were used as the anesthetic in these younger
patients when ketamine was used for sedation in the setting of cardiac
catheterization.
The use of ketamine as an agent to facilitate the performance of pediatric procedures has been well described.26 27 29 30 33 34 Some authors also believe that ketamine may represent the "optimal agent for intravenous sedation during bronchoscopy" in the pediatric patient.36 The evidence for the safe use of ketamine in pediatric bronchoscopy is limited.
Ketamine has been associated with laryngospasm, increased oral secretions, and alterations in pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygen consumption, heart rate, and cardiac output. Respiratory compromise related to ketamine has been specifically assessed in a number of large studies, as well as in a variety of locations, and has been consistently found to occur in approximately 3% of procedures.29 30 33 This is in comparison to complications after ketamine administration in 12 of 60 bronchoscopy procedures (20%) in our present study. As already noted, patients will often undergo bronchoscopy to establish the diagnosis of a pathologic process in the lung or airway. Many patients already required supplemental oxygen because of their lung disease. This may account for the higher frequency of complications observed in our study sample.
Regardless of the anesthetic method selected, basic tenets of care need to be followed.35 A health-care professional skilled in the monitoring of a patients cardiorespiratory status and able to handle airway emergencies should be present if sedation is administered. Preparation, in terms of education, experience, and equipment, must be guaranteed. The child should not have eaten for 6 h before the procedure, should be monitored by ECG and pulse oximetry, and should have functioning IV access during the procedure. The effect of advanced and ongoing psychological preparation cannot be minimized.1 28 37 When practical, we visit with the child and parent before the procedure to explain the procedure and to obtain assent and consent. A calm reassuring environment, with soothing conversation, is as important in minimizing stress as the sedative agent selected.1 15 16 28
Although numerous reports have found that ketamine is safe and efficacious for the performance of pediatric procedures, our findings indicate that its use in pediatric bronchoscopy may contribute to procedure-associated complications. Controlled, prospective studies, similar to those performed in adult patients, are necessary to sort out the best sedation strategy that also minimizes complications in pediatric patients undergoing flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication March 5, 1997. Accepted for publication June 29, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. P. O'Sullivan, L. Finger, and R. G. Zwerdling Use of Nasopharyngoscopy in the Evaluation of Children With Noisy Breathing Chest, April 1, 2004; 125(4): 1265 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Berkenbosch, G. R. Graff, and J. M. Stark Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine Sedation for Infant Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 1132 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Jenkins, C. Cool, S. J. Szefler, R. Covar, S. Brugman, E. W. Gelfand, and J. D. Spahn Histopathology of Severe Childhood Asthma: A Case Series Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 32 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Slonim and F. P. Ognibene Enchancing Patient Safety for Pediatric Bronchoscopy : Alternatives to Conscious Sedation Chest, August 1, 2001; 120(2): 341 - 342. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Nussbaum and M. Zagnoev Pediatric Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy With a Laryngeal Mask Airway Chest, August 1, 2001; 120(2): 614 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Stacey, E. Hurley, and A. Bush Sedation for Pediatric Bronchoscopy Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1): 316 - 317. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fitoz, C. Atasoy, A. Yagmurlu, S. Akyar, and H. Dindar Three-Dimensional CT of Congenital Esophageal Atresia and Distal Tracheoesophageal Fistula in Neonates: Preliminary Results Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1403 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |