Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Creamer, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrhart, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Creamer, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrhart, I. C.
(Chest. 1999;116:26S-27S.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Closing Pressure Rather Than Opening Pressure Determines Optimal Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Avoids Overdistention*

Kevin M. Creamer, MD; Laryssa L. McCloud, PhD; Lyle E. Fisher, MD and Ina C. Ehrhart, PhD

* From the Medical College of Georgia, Vascular Biology Center and Pediatric Critical Care, Augusta, GA.

Correspondence to: Kevin Creamer, MD, Pediatric Critical Care, Children's Medical Center, 1446 Harper St, Augusta, GA 30912


    Introduction
 TOP
 Introduction
 References
 
Ventilator-induced lung injury can result from either low lung volume ventilation with its associated cyclic alveolar collapse1 or from lung overdistention2 3 and volutrauma. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is the main determinant of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV).4 If PEEP is set too low, alveolar and bronchiolar collapse can occur. Tidal volume in conjunction with PEEP determines end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV), which is a key determinant in volutrauma.5 When PEEP is determined by the inflation limb inflection point, or the "opening pressure" (OP), of the pressure-volume (P-V) curve, it can be used to recruit collapsed alveoli, improving oxygenation as well as compliance.6 7 However, OP, an inspiratory parameter, may overestimate the least amount of PEEP required to maintain alveolar stability and result in overdistention.8 We decided to look at expiratory parameters to help determine optimal PEEP. We set out to find a mechanical ventilation strategy that would utilize optimal PEEP for alveolar recruitment but not result in overdistention.

We hypothesized that PEEP should be optimized to closing pressure (CP), the pressure at closing volume (CV), rather than OP. We also hypothesized that PEEP determined by CP would avoid overdistention, and allow ventilation on the most compliant portion of the P-V curve in both healthy and injured lungs.

We used mongrel dogs that were anesthetized and ventilated. After a left thoracotomy, they were then heparinized and exsanguinated. The left lower lobe was removed and the pulmonary vein, bronchus, and pulmonary artery were cannulated. The lobe was then perfused with blood using a roller head pump set at 600 mL/min, and pulmonary vein pressure was set at 5 cm H2O. The pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein, and airway pressures were measured continuously. We inflated and deflated the lobes with a syringe attached to the bronchial catheter and measured ventilatory parameters under the four conditions described below. We measured OP, CP, CV, and the deflation limb deflection point (Pdef), which represents the upper boundary of the compliant portion of the P-V curve. The EELV, if OP were used as PEEP, was also determined. The separate conditions these measurements were obtained under included the following: inflated and deflated from complete collapse (atelectasis), with deliberate hyperinflation (hyperinflated), after mechanical ventilation with (injured), and without injury (ventilated). Airway pressures were recorded after each stepwise volume change. The hyperinflated group was inflated beyond total lobe capacity, while the other three groups were inflated to total lung capacity.9 The injured lobes were injected with 50 µg of phorbol myristate acetate to simulate ARDS. Added volumes in the injured group were lower because of the significant edema and air trapping that resulted from the injury.

As shown in Table 1 , if OP were used as PEEP, the resultant EELV would be greater than the Pdef under all conditions. Since Pdef represents the upper volume of the compliant portion of the P-V curve, all subsequent ventilation would occur on the noncompliant portion of the curve. However, if the pressure at CV, or CP determined PEEP, all ventilation would take place entirely on the most compliant portion of the P-V curve.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Pressure and Volume Data

 
The findings in this isolated blood-perfused dog lung model allow us to conclude that the use OP as PEEP results in overdistention beyond the compliant portion of the P-V curve. This occurred under all conditions tested, including postinjury. We also conclude that the use of CP to determine PEEP would keep tidal ventilation in the optimal lung zone for both maintaining patency and avoiding overdistention. The pressures required to open the lung were not the pressures required to keep it open. "Open lung" strategies10 using PEEP greater than OP for the recruitment of collapsed alveoli can lead to overdistention, because they do not take into account the entire P-V curve. In situations in which P-V hysteresis is increased, the use of OP to determine PEEP will result in higher EELV than necessary during mechanical ventilation. Our model demonstrates two scenarios in which P-V hysteresis is increased: atelectasis and acute lung injury. We speculate that a mechanical ventilation strategy that includes PEEP to keep the lung above CV, and tidal volume limitation to keep EILV below the noncompliant portion of the P-V curve, would diminish the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury.


    References
 TOP
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Muscedere, JG, Mullin, JBM, Gan, K, et al (1994) Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149,1327-1334[Abstract]
  2. Carlton, DP, Cummings, JJ, Scheerer, RG, et al (1990) Lung over expansion increases pulmonary microvascular protein permeability in young lambs. J Appl Physiol 69,577-583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hernandez, LA, Peevy, KJ, Moise, AA, et al (1989) Chest wall restriction limits high airway pressure induced lung injury in young rabbit. J Appl Physiol 66,2364-2368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Katz, JA, Ozanne, GM, Zinn, SE, et al (1981) Time course and mechanics of lung-volume increase with PEEP in acute pulmonary failure. Anesthesiology 54,9-16[ISI][Medline]
  5. Dreyfuss, D, Saumon, G (1993) Role of tidal volume, FRC, and end-inspiratory volume in the development of pulmonary edema following mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 148,1194-1203[ISI][Medline]
  6. Ranieri, VM, Giuliani, R, Fiore, T, et al (1994) Volume-pressure curve of the respiratory system predicts effects of PEEP in ARDS: `occlusion' versus `constant flow' techniques. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149,19-27[Abstract]
  7. Matamis, D, Lemaire, F, Hart, A, et al (1984) Total respiratory pressure-volume curves in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 86,58-66[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Marini, JJ (1996) Tidal volume, PEEP, and barotrauma: an open and shut case? Chest 109,302-304[Free Full Text]
  9. Glaister, DH, Schroter, RC, Sudlow, MF, et al (1973) Bulk elastic properties of excised lungs and the effect of a transpulmonary pressure gradient. Respir Physiol 17,347-364[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Amato, MBP, Barbas, CSV, Medeiros, DM, et al (1995) Beneficial effects of the `open lung approach' with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152,1835-1846[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Creamer, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrhart, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Creamer, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrhart, I. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS