(Chest. 1999;116:523S-524S.)
© 1999
American College of Chest Physicians
Management of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule*
Role of Thoracoscopy in Diagnosis and Therapy
Scott J. Swanson, MD, FCCP;
Michael T. Jaklitsch, MD, FCCP;
Steven J. Mentzer, MD, FCCP;
Raphael Bueno, MD, FCCP;
Jeanne M. Lukanich, MD and
David J. Sugarbaker, MD, FCCP
*
From the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Correspondence to: Scott J. Swanson, MD, FCCP, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Objectives: The solitary pulmonary nodule remains a
common clinical problem. The essential question is whether the lesion
is malignant or not. This discussion presents the clinical practice and
looks at the problem.
Design: Didactic.
Setting: Academic tertiary-care hospital.
Patients: Prospective thoracic database.
Interventions: Minimally invasive
technique.
Results: The workup and treatment of
the solitary pulmonary nodule is presented with particular emphasis on
the role of minimally invasive techniques. A small single-institution
series is referenced.
Conclusions: The approach is
safe and highly effective in diagnosing and often in treating solitary
pulmonary nodules.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The
finding of a solitary pulmonary nodule on a chest radiograph is one of
the most common scenarios faced by clinicians. Typically, the most
relevant question is whether the lesion is malignant or not. The
differential diagnosis includes infectious, inflammatory, and other
benign etiologies. The workup of these lesions has evolved, to some
extent, over time. Tuberculosis, which made up a large percentage of
these lesions in the past,1
is now much less common. The
advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques has made a definitive
diagnosis likely when the lesion remains quite small, thus, at a more
favorable time point in the natural history of the
disease.2
Newer radiologic techniques have been purported
to increase the chance of making a diagnosis without the need for
tissue samples; however, this clearly remains to be
validated.3
Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for treatment of the solitary
pulmonary nodule when either a malignant or recalcitrant infectious
diagnosis is made.
 |
Diagnosis
|
|---|
The presumed diagnosis of the solitary pulmonary nodule is based
on several factors. The age of the patient, associated symptoms, risk
factors, and appearance of the lesion on the radiograph, including the
length of time lesion has been present, all give the clinician
information on which to base a working diagnosis. Obviously, it is
important to obtain a precise history that includes travel experience,
details of nicotine and asbestos exposure, any symptoms related to the
respiratory tract (eg, cough, hemoptysis, or pain), and
systemic symptoms of infection or inflammation.
The physical examination should be directed at signs of generalized
inflammation such as lymphadenopathy and the presence of malignancy.
The latter includes an examination of the skin, naso/oropharynx,
breast, and rectum for prostate evaluation, evidence of blood in the GI
tract, and any palpable masses.
All prior radiographs should be obtained to determine the length of
time the lesion has been present and whether there has been any change
in size. Caution should be exercised in diagnosing a lesion as benign
simply because it has not changed over time, because even lesions that
have been stable for > 5 years have been found to be malignant. The
characteristics of the lesion on radiograph can be suggestive, but not
diagnostic, of either cancer or a benign growth. Even "popcorn"
calcification may not always be diagnostic of a benign
lesion.4
Noninvasive methods of diagnosis include antigen skin testing, blood
testing for signs of inflammatory processes or infection, and sputum
analysis (microbiological and cytologic). All of these tests are
supportive but certainly not specific, and occasionally they may be
misleading. More invasive diagnostic maneuvers include bronchoscopy
with transbronchial biopsy, CT-guided needle biopsy, and surgical
excision. Of the methods mentioned above, the most cost-effective
procedure for making a definitive diagnosis would appear to be surgical
biopsy.5
Nonsurgical techniques, including transbronchial
biopsy and percutaneous needle aspiration, when used in combination,
have reported sensitivity rates of 95% for detecting malignancy. The
accuracy of transbronchial biopsy and percutaneous needle biopsy in
diagnosing benign lesions is lower, with correct diagnoses reported in
60% of cases.6
 |
Thoracoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment
|
|---|
Clearly, if a patient is a candidate for surgery, then surgery is
the procedure of choice to make a definitive diagnosis and, in many
instances, to provide therapy. Most diagnoses are very difficult to
establish without excision of the lesion. Fungal infection and
hamartomas on occasion can be diagnosed without removing the entire
lesion. However, much caution must be exercised in accepting a benign
diagnosis of a solitary pulmonary nodule on the basis of partial
information.
Minimally invasive techniques lend themselves well to establishing the
diagnosis of a solitary pulmonary nodule. A relatively small,
peripherally located nodule may be resected with excellent success
using a thoracoscopic technique.2
Although exact
parameters are not well defined, centrally located lesions,
particularly those in the upper lobe7
or larger lesions,
> 4 to 5 cm in diameter, will require a traditional
thoracotomy for resection.
Smaller lesions may be difficult to localize using a thoracoscopic
technique, and a number of methods have been reported to aid in
detection.8
9
Most centers that are experienced with
thoracoscopic techniques do not require specialized techniques. For
example, a series from the Brigham and Womens Hospital reported the
successful resection of lesions < 1 cm in diameter without any
special localization techniques.10
In that series, which
was presented at the American College of Chest Physicians meeting in
New York in 1995, the mean tumor size was 0.86 cm. Approximately half
of the lesions were malignant, and two thirds of those were primary
lung cancers (Table 1
). There was no operative mortality, and the median length of stay was 3
days.
Several reports have suggested that the length of stay in the hospital
and associated pain are less with a minimally invasive approach than
with a traditional thoracotomy.11
12
These are not
randomized studies, and the data will need to be validated as more
experience is gained with thoracoscopic resectional surgery.
At surgery, if the lesion is a primary non-small cell lung cancer
(NSCLC), then a definitive anatomic resection can be accomplished
during the same operation. In other instances, a definitive diagnosis
is made during surgery that will guide further therapy, and often, in
these cases, the patient is able to leave the hospital within 24 to
48 h.2
 |
Conclusion
|
|---|
The appearance of a solitary pulmonary nodule remains a common
clinical problem. The essential question is whether the lesion is
malignant. If the patient is a reasonable surgical candidate, surgical
excision, in particular thoracoscopic resection, is the best strategy
available for establishing a diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity
of this technique approaches 100%. Additionally, definitive therapy
may be accomplished during the same operative procedure. Newer
diagnostic techniques, such as positron emission tomography scans, are
currently being evaluated, but they must be measured against the
surgical "gold standard." Data are now becoming available that
suggest that many subcentimeter lesions that traditionally have been
observed are malignant.10
The typical practice is to
follow these lesions with serial radiographs. Early intervention may
favorably impact the prognosis in the instance of patients with NSCLC.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Abbreviation:
NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Wilkins, EW, Jr (1955) The asymptomatic isolated pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 52,515-520
-
DeCamp, MM, Jr, Jaklitsch, MT, Mentzer, SJ, et al (1995) The safety and versatility of video-thoracoscopy: a prospective analysis of 895 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 181,113-120[ISI][Medline]
-
Worsley, DF, Celler, A, Adam, MJ, et al (1997) Pulmonary nodules: differential diagnosis using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose single-photon emission computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168,771-774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Oei, TK, Wouters, EF, Visser, R, et al (1983) The value of conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT) in diagnosis of pulmonary hamartoma. Rontgenblatter 36,324-327[Medline]
-
Goldberg-Kahn, B, Healy, JC, Bishop, JW (1997) The cost of diagnosis: a comparison of four different strategies in the workup of solitary radiographic lung lesions. Chest 111,870-876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gasparini, S, Ferretti, M, Secchi, EB, et al (1995) Integration of transbronchial and percutaneous approach in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules or masses: experience with 1,027 consecutive cases. Chest 108,131-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schwarz, CD, Lenglinger, F, Eckmayr, J, et al (1994) VATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery) of undefined pulmonary nodules: preoperative evaluation of videoendoscopic resectability. Chest 106,1570-1574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Templeton, PA, Krasna, M (1993) Needle/wire lung nodule localization for thoracoscopic resection. Chest 104,953-954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wicky, S, Mayor, B, Cuttat, JF, et al (1994) CT-guided localizations of pulmonary nodules with methylene blue injections for thoracoscopic resections. Chest 106,1326-1328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Munden, RF, Pugatch, RD, Liptay, MJ, et al (1997) Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. Radiology 202,105-110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hazelrigg, Sr, Nunchuck, SK, Landreneau, RJ, et al (1993) Cost analysis for thoracoscopy: thoracoscopic wedge resection. Ann Thorac Surg 56,633-635[Abstract]
-
Santambrogio, L, Nosotti, M, Bellaviti, N, et al (1995) Videothoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for the diagnosis of the indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule. Ann Thorac Surg 59,868-871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. El-Sherif, W. E. Gooding, R. Santos, B. Pettiford, P. F. Ferson, H. C. Fernando, S. J. Urda, J. D. Luketich, and R. J. Landreneau
Outcomes of Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 13-Year Analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
August 1, 2006;
82(2):
408 - 416.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Mahesh, C. Forrester-Wood, A. Yunus, R. Ahsan, K. Amer, A. Morgan, and R. Ascione
Value of wide-margin wedge resection for solitary pulmonary nodule: a single center experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2004;
26(3):
474 - 479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. B. Tan, K. R. Flaherty, E. A. Kazerooni, and M. D. Iannettoni
The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Chest,
January 1, 2003;
123(1_suppl):
89S - 96S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Andrea, C. Paolo, S. Ascanelli, S. Davide, and P. Enzo
Significance of a single pulmonary nodule in patients with previous history of malignancy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
December 1, 2001;
20(6):
1101 - 1105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|