|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Center for Lung Research, Department of Medicine (Drs. Robbins and Loyd), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care (Dr. Gaine), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care (Dr. Schilz), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Tapson), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Rubin), UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, CA.
Correspondence to: Ivan M. Robbins, MD, Center for Lung Research, Room T-1217, MCN, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232; e-mail: Ivan.Robbins{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Case series of six patients with SLE and associated pulmonary hypertension receiving chronic treatment with epoprostenol.
Results: All 6 patients had severe pulmonary hypertension. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 57 ± 9 mm Hg (mean ± SD), and pulmonary vascular resistance was 14 ± 7 units before beginning therapy with epoprostenol. In 4 patients who underwent repeat hemodynamic evaluation (9 to 16 months after starting epoprostenol), mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased by 38 ± 21% and pulmonary vascular resistance by 58 ± 12%. Clinically, all patients improved from New York Heart Association class III or IV to class I or II. Doses of epoprostenol ranged from 4 to 46 ng/kg/min, and the longest duration of therapy has been 2.5 years. Side effects from epoprostenol have not differed from those seen in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, and except for one patient, there has been no exacerbation of SLE.
Conclusion: Epoprostenol was effective for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in this small group of patients with SLE. Further evaluation of epoprostenol therapy for patients with SLE and other diseases associated with pulmonary hypertension is warranted.
Key Words: epoprostenol pulmonary hypertension systemic lupus erythematosus
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Over the past two and a half years, we treated six patients with SLE and pulmonary hypertension with continuous IV epoprostenol, four of whom underwent repeat hemodynamic evaluation (9 to 16 months after starting epoprostenol). All six patients presented with rapidly progressing symptoms due to pulmonary hypertension. None demonstrated significant improvement with acute vasodilator testing during diagnostic right heart catheterization. We herein describe these six patients in detail, review the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with SLE, and discuss the role of epoprostenol therapy in patients with SLE.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
All patients underwent diagnostic right heart catheterization with acute vasodilator testing (Table 2) . Nitric oxide was used to assess vasoreactivity in two patients, epoprostenol was used in three patients, and both nitric oxide and epoprostenol were used in one patient. No patient demonstrated a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 13%, although two patients had an increase in cardiac output with acute testing with epoprostenol, leading to a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 20%. One of these patients was not started on epoprostenol until 2 months later when her clinical condition worsened; the other was identified as NYHA class IV, with a mean right atrial pressure of 15 mm Hg, and was started on a chronic infusion of epoprostenol at the time of catheterization.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% when pulmonary hypertension is
present.18
Many patients in these reports either had
significant restrictive lung disease or the data were inadequate to
determine the etiology of the pulmonary hypertension. In addition, PAP
elevation was generally modest. There are only a few case reports in
the literature of patients with SLE and severe pulmonary hypertension
resulting in right heart failure.9
19
20
21
22
Autopsy findings
from these patients have demonstrated pathologic changes of medial
hypertrophy, intimal fibrosis, and plexiform lesions, which are
virtually identical to the alterations seen in patients with PPH.
Consistent with previous reports describing severe pulmonary
hypertension with SLE, the patients in this study did not have
significant interstitial lung disease, pulmonary emboli, or left-sided
heart dysfunction, indicating that their symptoms were primarily the
result of pulmonary vascular disease. The diagnosis of SLE was well established in the six patients included in this study, and duration of illness did not correlate with either the development of pulmonary hypertension or the severity. The occurrence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with SLE, at a time when nonpulmonary disease activity was quiescent, has previously been reported.23 24 There were minimal signs of lupus activity at the time these six patients became symptomatic from pulmonary hypertension. Furthermore, there has been only one SLE flare during treatment with epoprostenol and no deterioration in renal function in any patient.
One third of patients with SLE have antiphospholipid antibodies, but most do not develop thromboembolic complications.25 Three of our patients had antiphospholipid antibodies, but large vessel pulmonary thromboembolic disease was excluded as the cause of pulmonary hypertension. The significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in the development of pulmonary hypertension remains to be determined.
Therapy with calcium channel blockers, efficacious in about 25% of patients with PPH,26 has not been effective in patients with SLE and pulmonary hypertension. Though there are a few anecdotal reports of improvement with corticosteroids,19 20 27 most studies have not shown any benefit. All the patients in this study had received corticosteroids for varying lengths of time, and five developed pulmonary hypertension while receiving prednisone. Immunosuppressive therapy has also been used in patients with SLE and pulmonary hypertension without significant improvement. There was a similar lack of benefit noted in the three patients in this series who were taking immunosuppressive medications.
Because approximately 70% of patients with PPH show improvement with epoprostenol therapy,28 it is not surprising that all six patients presented here showed an impressive symptomatic and clinical response to epoprostenol. Effective doses of epoprostenol appear to be similar to those found in patients with PPH. One patient has done remarkably well on a very low dose of epoprostenol (4 ng/kg/min). She has had a sustained, marked improvement in her functional status and is currently identified as NYHA class I/II. The other five patients have required regular dose increases. Presently, there is no consensus on the optimal strategy for chronic epoprostenol dosing.
These preliminary results indicate that pulmonary hypertension associated with SLE may be as responsive to epoprostenol therapy as that found in PPH. In contrast, a recent abstract reported that patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with connective tissue disease receiving epoprostenol had a 2-year survival of only 50% compared with PPH patients treated concurrently who had a 75% survival.29 Many patients in this series had scleroderma or CREST syndrome and were older than the PPH patients. Results of a multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of epoprostenol in 111 patients with the scleroderma spectrum of diseases showed no survival advantage at 12 weeks in the group receiving epoprostenol, though there were significant improvements in the 6-min walk test and in quality of life.30 Comorbid illness and failure to impact on other aspects of scleroderma/CREST syndrome likely contributed to the lack of improvement in survival.
Pulmonary vascular abnormalities of patients with SLE-associated pulmonary hypertension are histologically similar to those of patients with PPH and suggests a common pathologic process. SLE and PPH are illnesses frequently found in women of child-bearing age, which raises the possibility of shared etiologic factors. However, while the final result may be similar in genetically susceptible individuals, the initiating event in the pathologic process may be different in patients with SLE compared to patients with PPH.
In conclusion, we have presented six patients with SLE-associated pulmonary hypertension treated with chronic administration of epoprostenol. All have experienced dramatic improvement in functional status, without unexpected problems related to epoprostenol therapy. The four patients who underwent repeat right heart catheterization have shown a marked decrease in PVR. These results indicate that chronic treatment with epoprostenol may be effective and well tolerated in patients with SLE who develop marked pulmonary hypertension unrelated to fibrotic lung disease. Whether the experience in patients with SLE or other conditions associated with pulmonary hypertension will ultimately be the same as that in patients with PPH requires a longer duration of follow-up and treatment of a greater number of patients. Further evaluation of this therapy in patients with SLE and other diseases associated with pulmonary hypertension is warranted.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 6, 1999. Accepted for publication July 22, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Swigris, A. Fischer, J. Gilles, R. T. Meehan, and K. K. Brown Pulmonary and Thrombotic Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 271 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Humbert, R.J. Barst, I.M. Robbins, R.N. Channick, N. Galie, A. Boonstra, L.J. Rubin, E.M. Horn, A. Manes, and G. Simonneau Combination of bosentan with epoprostenol in pulmonary arterial hypertension: BREATHE-2 Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2004; 24(3): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Oudiz, R. J. Schilz, R. J. Barst, N. Galie, S. Rich, L. J. Rubin, and G. Simonneau Treprostinil, a Prostacyclin Analogue, in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated With Connective Tissue Disease Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2): 420 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Kuhn, D. W. Byrne, P. G. Arbogast, T. P. Doyle, J. E. Loyd, and I. M. Robbins Outcome in 91 Consecutive Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Epoprostenol Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 580 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hoeper, N. Galie, G. Simonneau, and L. J. Rubin New Treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2002; 165(9): 1209 - 1216. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.M. Hoeper Pulmonary hypertension in collagen vascular disease Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2002; 19(3): 571 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. AGUILAR and H. W. FARBER Epoprostenol (Prostacyclin) Therapy in HIV-associated Pulmonary Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2000; 162(5): 1846 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. W HIGENBOTTAM, M. ASIF, K. MCCORMACK, T. E SIDDONS, E. A G DEMONCHEAUX, K. ASHUTOSH, and K. PHADKE Use of nitric oxide inhalation in COPD Thorax, November 1, 2000; 55(11): 978 - 978. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Horn, R. J. Barst, and M. Poon Epoprostenol for Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Chest, October 1, 2000; 118(4): 1229 - 1230. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |