|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Institute of Pulmonology (Drs. Glazer, Nusair, Breuer, Lafair, and Berkman) and the Department of Pathology (Dr. Sherman), Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Correspondence to: Neville Berkman, MBBCh, Institute of Pulmonology, Hadassah University Hospital, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel, 91120.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: BAL immunocompromised mucormycosis neutropenia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most frequently observed manifestation of mucormycosis is the characteristic rhinocerebral infection, which may initially mimic bacterial sinusitis, and later extend to involve and destroy the hard palate and the orbit, and further invade the carotid artery. The GI tract and the brain may be involved in disseminated mucormycosis. The lung is more rarely involved by infection with this fungus. Such pulmonary involvement may progress and include invasion of blood vessels.
In reported series of invasive pulmonary mucormycosis, the diagnosis is often made at postmortem or premortem examination by using transbronchial biopsy (TBB) or open lung biopsy. However, many patients at risk for this infection are thrombocytopenic, which precludes the performance of invasive diagnostic procedures. BAL has not been evaluated for the diagnosis of this infection.
We present five patients with pulmonary mucormycosis that was diagnosed during life in our institution; three of the five patients had a diagnostic BAL.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The definitive diagnosis was made in all patients by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. BAL was performed in all patients, and TBB was performed whenever there was no coagulopathy and the thrombocyte count was > 50,000 cells/µL.
Material from TBB is embedded in paraffin blocks, and sections of 5 µm are stained with hematoxylin-eosin. BAL fluid is routinely cytocentrifuged and stained with Papanicolaou stain, Gomori methenamine silver stain. BAL fluid is also sent for bacterial, fungal, viral, and mycobacterial cultures.
A diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis was considered definite in the presence of histologic evidence of invasive fungal infection. For BAL, the finding of typical morphologic features of Mucor on direct staining or culture in the presence of compatible clinical presentation as well as favorable response to antifungal therapy was also considered diagnostic.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Outcome
The mean survival was 3.6 weeks. None of our patients survived
beyond 3 months; however, the two patients who underwent lung resection
did not have evidence of recurrence of mucormycosis up until their
death. Patient 2 died of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the
remaining lung, and patient 1 died 2 months after surgery because of
progressive hepatic failure secondary to severe chronic graft-vs-host
disease. Patient 3 survived at least 1 month past surgery but later
died due to acute myeloblastic leukemia relapse in his home country.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Besides DM, other well-recognized risk factors for invasive mucormycosis include neutropenia,2 hematopoietic malignancies, and CSE therapy.3 Among solid-organ transplants, patients undergoing renal transplantation (renal-Tx) for end-stage diabetic nephropathy, who are more likely to develop metabolic acidosis, may be more susceptible to mucormycosis.4 Two of our patients had CSE-induced DM, of which one had undergone renal-Tx. Neither patient had metabolic acidosis as a primary event during presentation with pulmonary mucormycosis.
The most common radiographic manifestation in our patients was the presence of cavitary lesions. In a recent review of imaging findings in 32 cases of mucormycosis, two thirds of the patients had consolidation as a main finding.5 Forty-one percent of the patients had cavitation within pulmonary consolidation or masses. Other radiographic manifestations include multifocal consolidation, on "air crescent sign" whenever a pulmonary infarct results from vascular invasion, and rarely pleural effusion.6
The antemortem diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis is often missed because the diagnosis is not suspected or pursued thoroughly enough. Because postmortem examinations are rarely performed in our country, this series includes only diseases diagnosed antemortem. It is thus possible that the number of cases of pulmonary mucormycosis in our institution is much higher than that reported here.
According to published studies, the diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis requires the demonstration of the typical nonseptated right angle branching-shaped hyphae within the lung tissue.3 A positive finding from BAL culture is suggestive but not considered definitive.6 However, since hematologic patients are frequently thrombocytopenic, obtaining TBB is frequently not feasible. In such cases, BAL may be the only diagnostic modality available.
Of our five cases, the BAL finding was positive in three (60%). Of these, two patients were unable to undergo TBB; in these cases, the diagnosis was made by BAL alone. In all three cases with a positive finding on BAL, mucormycosis proved to indeed be a true pathogen and not merely a coincidental finding; in one case, this was confirmed by surgery (thoracotomy), and in the second by a positive finding on TBB. In the third patient, the clinical response after the initiation of antifungal therapy, together with failure to respond to broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy or to identify another pathogen despite extensive evaluation, led us to believe that mucormycosis was a true pathogen in this patient (patient 3).
There is little available literature that describes the diagnosis of mucormycosis by using BAL.7 8 A recent report described a diabetic patient in whom a diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis was made by BAL.9 Conventional recommendations in the literature require demonstration of Mucor hyphae within the pulmonary parenchyma in order to make the diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis.6 Our findings suggest otherwise. We believe that whenever mucormycosis is found in BAL cultures from a neutropenic or immunocompromised patient, the diagnosis of invasive mucormycosis is extremely likely and should be assumed until proven otherwise.
The diagnostic yield of fungal culture was poor (20%; one of five cases). The culture finding was negative even in cases in which findings from direct microscopy of BAL or lung tissue were positive. Similar results of culture have been reported by others.5 This yield may be dependent on the specific laboratory performing these cultures, but in our hands, culture adds little to the histopathologic tests. Our data suggest that BAL could be a useful diagnostic procedure for pulmonary mucormycosis, with an acceptable risk for thrombocytopenic and critically ill patients in whom TBB is contraindicated.
From our data, it is not possible to comment on the negative predictive value of BAL for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis. Conclusions regarding this issue would require the performance of open lung biopsy or postmortem examination in all patients in whom BAL is analyzed.
The recommended treatment for pulmonary mucormycosis includes treatment of the underlying condition, surgical removal of the devitalized tissue, and IV administration of AMB. According to recent reports, early surgical treatment may substantially reduce mortality (45% with surgery vs 70 to 80% with medical management only).5 7 Although surgical resection of pulmonary parenchyma involved with mucormycosis seems to have eradicated mucormycosis in our patients, the underlying condition was the main factor that determined their outcome and survival. Consequently, overall survival in our group was dismal regardless of surgical intervention.
In conclusion, pulmonary mucormycosis should be suspected in patients with a high risk for invasive fungal pulmonary infections, particularly when they present with single or multifocal pulmonary infiltrates with cavitation. The diagnosis of fungal pneumonia requires the demonstration of fungi within the pulmonary parenchyma on lung biopsy; however, BAL, a relatively safe diagnostic tool, may allow the diagnosis of mucormycosis in cases where lung biopsy is contraindicated. Our findings strongly imply that the presence of mucormycosis within the BAL fluid is diagnostic of pulmonary mucormycosis in patients who are prone to such an infection. Although surgical resection of pulmonary parenchyma involved with mucormycosis may have eradicated the infection, the underlying condition was the main factor that determined outcome and mortality.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication April 15, 1999. Accepted for publication July 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Nusair, R. Breuer, M.Y. Shapira, N. Berkman, and R. Or Low incidence of pulmonary complications following nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2004; 23(3): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |