|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the 2nd Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Three 5-min pacing intervals were applied in a random order, at a rate of 15 beats/min above the resting sinus rate. Atrioventricular sequential pacing from the two sites was compared with atrial pacing. During each pacing mode, left ventricular pressure was recorded, and cardiac output was calculated using Doppler echocardiography.
Setting: Cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Patients: Twenty patients (18 male, mean age 62 ± 11 years) without structural heart disease were studied.
Results: During atrial pacing, maximum
negative first derivative of pressure (dp/dt) was 1,535 ± 228 mm
Hg/s; during pacing from the apex it decreased to 1,221 ± 294 mm
Hg/s (p = 0.0001), but was not significantly different during pacing
from the outflow tract (1,431 ± 435 mm Hg/s, p > 0.05).
Isovolumic relaxation time constant (
) during atrial pacing was
39.7 ± 11.9 ms; during pacing from the apex, it increased to
47.9 ± 14.0 (p = 0.001), but was not significantly different
during pacing from the outflow tract (42.5 ± 11.2, p > 0.05).
Peak systolic pressure decreased significantly during atrioventricular
sequential pacing from either site; however, it did not differ between
the two sites. No differences in end-diastolic pressure, maximum
positive dp/dt, or cardiac output could be demonstrated.
Conclusion: In patients with no structural heart disease, short-term right ventricular outflow tract pacing is associated with more favorable diastolic function, compared to right ventricular apical pacing.
Key Words: apex diastolic function hemodynamics outflow tract pacing
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients underwent contrast left ventriculography, coronary arteriography, and electrophysiologic study, as clinically indicated. All studies were performed in the fasting, postabsorptive state, without the use of premedication. A standard percutaneous Seldinger technique was used to gain access to the femoral vein and artery. Patients with no significant coronary artery disease were enrolled in the study. For purposes of this study, "significant coronary artery disease" was defined as (1) any degree of stenosis in the left main stem, or (2) stenosis > 50% in diameter in any other coronary vessel.
Pacing Protocol
One electrode catheter was positioned in the right atrium and
one in the right ventricle. Three pacing modes were applied: atrial
pacing, DDD with ventricular pacing from the right ventricular apex,
and DDD with ventricular pacing from the right ventricular outflow
tract; the order was chosen randomly. Pacing was performed with a DDD
temporary pulse generator (model 5346; Medtronic, Inc; Minneapolis,
MN). During outflow tract pacing, the electrode was placed high in the
outflow tract, almost to the pulmonary valve, and was pulled back until
the tip pointed in a lateral direction on a posteroanterior
fluoroscopic projection, as previously described.4
The
position was confirmed in the right and left anterior oblique
projections. After fine manipulations of the ventricular electrode, the
pacing site producing the shortest QRS-complex duration was
chosen as the final outflow tract pacing site. We have previously
reported on this electrode positioning procedure in
detail.5
To avoid fusion beats, atrioventricular
delay was set at 60% of the intrinsic PR interval. The pacing rate was
15 beats/min higher than the resting sinus rate. Each pacing mode
lasted for 5 min, with 3-min intervals between each mode.
Pressure Recordings
Left ventricular pressure was recorded during the last 30 s
of each pacing protocol, using a high-fidelity, micromanometer-tipped
pressure catheter (Millar Instruments; Houston, TX). All measurements
were performed using a custom-made software program, and recordings
were stored on a hard disk. This program, which allows accurate
measurements of multiple variables on a beat-to-beat basis, has been
described previously.6
Variables were measured during
atrial pacing (AAI) and during DDD pacing from the two sites. To
express steady-state values during the last 30 s of each pacing
protocol, data were averaged from beats 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50.
Variables
The following hemodynamic variables were measured: left
ventricular peak systolic pressure (SP), left ventricular end-diastolic
pressure, maximum positive and maximum negative first derivative of
pressure (dp/dt). Isovolumic relaxation time constant (
) was
calculated using a zero asymptote from peak negative rate of decrease
of left ventricular pressure over time (dp/dt) to 5 mm Hg above the
previous left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.7
Cardiac Output Measurements
At the end of each pacing protocol, cardiac output was measured
using Doppler echocardiography. This method was favored over the Fick
or thermodilution techniques because the Doppler technique is
practical, reproducible, and accurate.8
9
The equipment
used was the Sonos 2500 (Hewlett-Packard; Andover, MA) with a 3.5-MHz
transducer. Measurements were performed using standard
techniques.10
In brief, the highest audio signal and the
sharpest outline with the maximal envelope were used to assess blood
flow velocities in the ascending aorta from the apical five-chamber
view. Measurements were performed off-line using a computer-assisted
digitization system. The area under the Doppler flow velocity curve was
determined by digitizing the signal from baseline to baseline. An
average of three consecutive cycles was taken. Cardiac output was
calculated as the systolic velocity integral times the aortic root
area, times heart rate. The aortic root area was measured using the
parasternal long-axis view. Heart rate was measured using two
consecutive spikes on the ECG. All measurements were blindly performed
by two experienced echocardiographers (DT and JAP).
QRS-complex Duration
QRS-complex duration was measured from hard copy recordings (at
paper speed of 100 mm/s) using hand-held calipers. Measurements were
performed at baseline and during each pacing sequence. QRS-complex
duration was averaged from three consecutive complexes in the lead with
the widest QRS complex.
Statistics
Differences in variables were compared using the analysis of
variance for repeated measures (split plot design), utilizing the
Statistica statistical software (version 5, 1997 edition; StatSoft;
Tulsa, OK). Post hoc analysis was performed using Tukeys
multiple comparisons test. Values are expressed as mean± SD.
Statistical significance was defined at an
level of 0.05. Percent
changes from atrial pacing were calculated for DDD pacing from the
two sites and were compared using the Students paired t
test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Left Ventricular Pressure Data:
Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and maximum positive dp/dt
were comparable between the three pacing protocols. Significant
variance was found for maximum negative dp/dt,
, and for peak
systolic pressure (Table 1
). Compared to AAI pacing, maximum negative dp/dt decreased
significantly during pacing from the apex (p = 0.0001), but was not
statistically significantly different during pacing from the outflow
tract (p > 0.05). When DDD pacing from the two sites was compared,
maximum negative dp/dt was significantly higher during outflow tract,
compared with apical pacing (p = 0.004).
increased significantly
during pacing from the apex (p = 0.01), but was not statistically
significantly different during pacing from the outflow tract. When DDD
pacing from the two sites was compared,
was significantly lower
during outflow tract, compared with apical pacing (p = 0.036).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several experimental animal studies have indicated that, during pacing, a hemodynamic impairment occurs that is proportional to the degree of the pacing-induced wall motion asynchrony.1 2 3 14 15 Burkhoff et al1 paced isolated canine hearts at various sites, including the left ventricular apex, the left ventricular free wall, and the right ventricular free wall. Peak left ventricular pressure varied significantly between sites, being higher with shorter QRS complexes. In a similar experimental setting, pacing from the right ventricular lateral wall was associated with a significant decrease in maximum positive and negative dp/dt, compared with left ventricular apical pacing.14 Mabo et al15 showed that mean BP fell with right ventricular apical pacing but remained stable with pacing from the His-Purkinje bundle.
The results from the animal studies1 2 3 11 12 14 15 indicate that, during pacing, ventricular performance deteriorates in proportion to the extent of induced ventricular asynchrony. Our study tested the hypothesis that, compared to pacing from the apex, pacing from the outflow tract may be associated with more favorable left ventricular hemodynamics.
Giudici et al16 examined right ventricular outflow tract pacing acutely in 89 patients, and they noted a significant benefit in cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography. Similarly, de Cock et al17 studied 17 patients and reported a higher cardiac index during pacing from the right ventricular outflow tract at three pacing rates (85 beats/min, 100 beats/min, and 120 beats/min). However, these studies had three significant limitations: (1) in both studies,16 17 only ventricular pacing was evaluated; (2) although the hemodynamic results of pacing-induced ventricular asynchrony may vary in different patient subgroups,16 17 inhomogeneous groups of patients were included, with an apparently wide range of left ventricular function and a variation of the severity of coronary artery disease; (3) in both studies,16 17 only cardiac output was compared, and detailed hemodynamic data were not reported.
We compared systolic and diastolic left ventricular function indexes during pacing from the two sites in a homogeneous group of patients, ie, in patients with normal left ventricular function and absence of significant coronary artery disease. Furthermore, atrioventricular sequential pacing was examined. Such pacing is a more physiologic pacing mode, it results in substantial hemodynamic advantages,18 and it is widely used in the absence of atrial fibrillation.
Apical pacing is associated with an impairment in left ventricular
relaxation.19
20
In the animal model, it has been shown
that this impairment correlates with the degree of wall motion
asynchrony.2
Compared with right ventricular apical
pacing, outflow tract pacing may be associated with less ventricular
asynchrony, resulting in higher positive and negative dp/dt,
irrespective of the atrioventricular delay.3
In
agreement with this concept, we report a lower
and a higher peak
negative dp/dt during outflow tract pacing, indicating more favorable
left ventricular relaxation. This benefit could be attributed to
shorter intraventricular conduction times during outflow tract pacing,
evidenced by shorter QRS complexes. Previous studies20
21
22
have shown that indexes of isovolumic relaxation are independent of
loading conditions, but are sensitive to pacing-induced changes in
ventricular activation sequence. Our results confirm this notion, as
comparable end-diastolic and peak systolic pressures were found during
DDD pacing from the two sites.
In our study, we found no differences in cardiac output or in other systolic function indexes. Our results are in agreement with those of Buckingham et al,23 who compared the two ventricular pacing sites, in a study cohort very similar to ours; they reported no significant differences in cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography.23 In contrast, in patients with poor left ventricular function and low cardiac output, a pacing site that decreases pacing-induced asynchrony may be associated with a significant acute hemodynamic improvement.24
Limitations of the Study
We believe that our study contributes to the ongoing research on
the optimum ventricular pacing site. However, a few limitations may be
apparent.
First, our study examined the effects of pacing site on ventricular hemodynamics at the resting, supine position and not at the upright position or during exertion.
Second, an important caveat needs to be made: the acute hemodynamic changes produced by short-term pacing do not necessarily predict the long-term hemodynamic status. A recent report25 failed to show any symptomatic improvement or any hemodynamic benefit after chronic (3 months) pacing from the right ventricular outflow tract, by comparison with apical pacing.
Third, our results probably apply to a minority of patients requiring permanent pacing, namely patients with normal left ventricular function and absence of coronary artery disease.
Clinical Implications
It appears that right ventricular outflow tract pacing results in
less ventricular asynchrony because of the proximity of this pacing
site with the His-Purkinje conduction system.4
In patients
with normal left ventricular systolic function, such pacing seems to
result in better indexes of left ventricular relaxation. Further
studies are necessary, in order to examine whether the acute
hemodynamic changes are sustained and whether these changes are
translated into a symptomatic benefit and/or an improved outcome.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
= isovolumic relaxation time constant Correspondence to: Theofilos M. Kolettis, MD, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Syngrou Ave, 176 74 Kallithea, Athens, Greece; e-mail: elbee@ath.forthnet.gr
Received for publication December 23, 1998. Accepted for publication July 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Hay, V. Melenovsky, B. J. Fetics, D. P. Judge, A. Kramer, J. Spinelli, C. Reister, D. A. Kass, and R. D. Berger Short-Term Effects of Right-Left Heart Sequential Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, and Atrioventricular Nodal Block Circulation, November 30, 2004; 110(22): 3404 - 3410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Peschar, H. de Swart, K. J. Michels, R. S. Reneman, and F. W. Prinzen Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 2, 2003; 41(7): 1218 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kale and D. H. Bennett Pacemaker prevention therapies for the control of drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(2): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. de Cock, M. C. Giudici, and J. W. Twisk Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: A quantitative review Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(3): 275 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Bourke, T. Hawkins, P. Keavey, M. Tynan, S. Jamieson, R. Behulova, and S. S. Furniss Evolution of ventricular function during permanent pacing from either right ventricular apex or outflow tract following AV-junctional ablation for atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(3): 219 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |