|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1-Antitrypsin Alleles in Patients With Bronchiectasis*
* From the Respiratory and Intensive Care Department (Drs. Cuvelier, Muir, and Benhamou), Unité INSERM 295 (Drs. Cuvelier, Martin, and Sesboüé), and the Department of Biostatistics (Drs. Hellot and Bénichou), University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Correspondence to: Antoine Cuvelier, MD, Respiratory and Intensive Care Department, Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, CHU de Rouen, 76031 Rouen CEDEX, France; e-mail:antoine.cuvelier{at}chu-rouen.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin (AAT)
deficiency, but the distribution of AAT alleles among bronchiectatic
patients is not known. Patients and design: Two hundred two patients, 104 men and 98 women, with a mean age (SD) of 63.7 ± 15.4 years, had bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT scan alone (n = 178), bronchography with or without CT scan (n = 17), or radiography alone (n = 7). AAT phenotypes (classified according to the protease inhibitor [PI] system) were determined by isoelectric focusing in blood samples obtained from all patients. Bronchiectasis was primary in 121 cases and secondary in 81 patients. Allele and phenotype frequencies were compared retrospectively between bronchiectatic patients and healthy blood donors living in the same geographic area.
Results: The PI phenotype frequencies among patients were the following: MM, 81.18%; MS, 11.88%; MZ, 3.46%; IZ, 0.49%; IM, 0.49%; SS, 1.48%; SZ, 0.49%; and ZZ, 0.49%. The allelic frequencies among patients were the following: M, 89.1%; S, 7.67%; Z, 2.72%; and I, 0.49%. There was no difference in the distribution of alleles or phenotypes either between patients and control subjects or between patients with secondary and primary bronchiectasis. A significant difference was found between bronchiectatic patients with and without coexisting emphysema (p = 0.028). This difference was caused by an overrepresentation of PI*Z alleles in bronchiectatic patients with coexisting emphysema.
Conclusions: Our results do not support a physiopathologic implication of the AAT genes in the development of bronchiectasis. We suggest that bronchiectasis may be a consequence of emphysema in PI*Z patients rather than a primary effect.
Key Words:
1-antitrypsin bronchiectasis COPD emphysema
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin (AAT) is a highly polymorphic
protein, the synthesis of which is governed by a 12.2-kilobase gene
organized in seven exons and located on the long arm of chromosome 14
at position q3131.2. Most of the variants of AAT in humans are
classified according to the protease inhibitor (PI) system, as defined
by isoelectric focusing of plasma in polyacrylamide at an acidic pH.
Greater polymorphic variation has been recognized by using restriction
fragment length and direct DNA sequence analysis. These techniques now
are able to identify > 75 distinct alleles of the AAT
gene.1
The AAT gene product is a 54-kd serine proteinase
inhibitor (serpin) and the major inhibitor of neutrophil elastase in
serum and tissue. Very few alleles are associated with a decreased
protein concentration in serum. Some patients with pulmonary emphysema
have infrequent phenotypes (null-null, null-Z, ZZ, or SZ) associated
with AAT serum concentrations of < 20% of normal values. An
unrestricted elastase activity has been suggested as an explanation for
pulmonary parenchymal degradation. However, an increasing recognition
of asymptomatic ZZ siblings suggests that a cofactor, particularly
tobacco smoke, is necessary to develop emphysema in AAT-deficient
patients. A few case reports have suggested a putative association between bronchiectasis and AAT deficiency in the absence of emphysema.2 3 4 5 More recently, investigations using CT scans have demonstrated the presence of bronchiectasis among patients with AAT deficiency.6 7 8 The aim of our study was, therefore, to compare AAT gene distribution between patients with bronchiectasis and control subjects and to assess AAT gene distribution among several clinical subgroups of bronchiectatic patients.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The control population consisted of 1,030 unrelated healthy blood donors of both sexes living in the same geographic area, ie, the Rouen area in France.10
AAT Phenotype Determination
All patients and control subjects had AAT phenotype determined
by isoelectric focusing of blood samples in polyacrylamide gels. The
same methodology has been in use in our laboratory for > 20 years.
Briefly, isoelectric focusing was performed on a multiphor apparatus
(model LKB 2117; Pharmacia; Uppsala, Sweden) connected to a power
supply (model LKB 2103; Pharmacia). Each gel was made to a final
concentration of acrylamide 5% (w/v), carrier ampholytes 1% (w/v;
ampholytes 4.2 to 4.9; Pharmacia), and sucrose 12% (w/v).
Polymerization was achieved with riboflavin 0.04% (volume/volume)
under ultraviolet light for 1 h. After 1 h of premigration (5
W, 5 mA, 500 V), samples were applied by means of 5 x 1 mm No. 3
filter paper (Whatman; Clifton, NJ). Focusing was performed for 2
h with the following maximal conditions: 10 W, 10 mA, and 1,600 V.
Fixation, staining, and destaining of the gels were conducted as
described elsewhere.10
Because AAT serum concentrations are of low value for screening patients with intermediate AAT deficiency, these data are not routinely assessed in our department and were only partly available from patient records in this study.
CT Scan
CT scans were performed with 10-mm collimation at 10-mm
intervals through the chest during suspended inspiration with the
patient in the supine position. For some patients, thin-section images
were obtained at 1-mm intervals. A diagnosis of bronchiectasis was made
on the basis of the presence of a bronchus with a diameter greater than
that of its accompanying pulmonary artery branch. Patients with
bronchial thickening without any dilatation of the lumen of the airways
were not included in the study.
Statistical Analysis
For control subjects and patients, or patient subgroups, PI
allele frequencies were calculated by gene counting according to the
Hardy-Weinberg law, and the observed phenotype numbers were compared
with expected values. Given the low figures occasionally observed in
some classes, the comparisons of AAT phenotype distributions and gene
frequencies between groups were performed with the extended Fishers
Exact Test (StatXact 3.1; Cytel Software Corporation; Cambridge, MA)
whenever possible; otherwise, a method based on the Monte Carlo
procedure11
was used. All tests were two-sided and were
considered significant for a p value < 0.05. Calculations were
performed with computer software (StatView; Abacus Concepts; Berkeley,
CA; and CHIRXC; provided by Dr. Dimitri Zaykin, PhD; Institute of
Marine Biology, 1980; Vladivostok, Russia).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bronchiectasis was limited to one lobe in 49 patients (24.3%). Bronchiectasis was unilateral in 65 patients (32.2%) and bilateral in 137 patients (67.8%). The following possible causes of bronchiectasis were suggested in 81 patients: posttuberculosis (n = 57); rheumatoid arthritis (n = 8); respiratory infections during childhood (n = 8); Ig deficiency (n = 3); cystic fibrosis (n = 2); pulmonary fibrosis (n = 2); and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 1). Historical, clinical, and radiologic data were compatible with idiopathic bronchiectasis in 121 patients (59.9%). Emphysema was present on CT scan or radiography in 42 patients (20.8%). Bronchorrhea was the main clinical pattern (85.1%), followed by dyspnea (75.2%). Digital clubbing was present in 38% of patients, and hemoptysis was recorded in 39.8%. Respiratory insufficiency was present in 43.6% of the 202 patients, indicating the severity of the disease in our study population.
AAT Phenotype Distribution Among Patients
The distribution of AAT phenotypes among patients with
bronchiectasis and control subjects (Table 1
) showed a remarkably similar number of MM, MS, and MZ phenotypes. Nine
patients were heterozygous and only one patient was homozygous for the
Z gene. The apparent overrepresentation of rare and deficient
phenotypes (IZ, 1 patient; SZ, 1 patient; and ZZ, 1 patient) in
patients was not statistically significant (p = 0.1077).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several case reports describing patients with coexisting bronchiectasis and AAT deficiency have been published since the 1970s.2 3 4 5 However, isolated case reports cannot provide any causal link between these two conditions.13 Moreover, some of these previously reported patients had clinical conditions potentially leading to bronchiectasis, eg, severe childhood pneumonia, cystic fibrosis, or remote tuberculosis. Three recent studies assessed the incidence of bronchiectasis by CT scan in patients with AAT deficiency. Shin and Ho6 described seven patients with homozygous AAT deficiency and negative sweat test and without Ig deficiency. Four patients had chronic bronchitis, and all patients were smokers or ex-smokers. All seven patients had severe emphysema, especially in the lower lobes. Three patients had bronchiectasis (43%). Guest and Hansell7 reported CT scan data in 17 AAT-deficient patients. Bronchial dilatations were noted in six cases (35%) and bronchial wall thickening in one case. These authors reported one patient with cystic bronchiectasis and suggested that the deficiency "may directly affect the airways in addition to the lung parenchyma." Finally, King et al8 studied 14 patients with AAT deficiency using thoracic CT scan. Only one patient had AAT deficiency diagnosed by electrophoresis, and one patient had PI*SZ phenotype diagnosed. Six patients (43%) had evidence of multilobar bronchiectasis on CT scan. Interestingly, bronchiectasis was more prevalent in lobes in which the emphysema score was higher. The incidence of bronchiectasis in patients with AAT deficiency is remarkably similar in these three studies, with a common overall estimate of about 40%. Inasmuch as these authors could not determine whether bronchiectasis is a consequence of AAT deficiency or a parallel occurrence, their data do not provide convincing proof of a causal relationship between the two conditions.
The best approach to demonstrate a potential link between AAT deficiency and bronchiectasis is to compare the AAT allelic distribution in an unselected and large population of bronchiectatic patients with that of a control population. To our knowledge, only a few studies were designed to that end.14 15 16 From our point of view, these studies had several methodological limitations: diagnosis of bronchiectasis was usually assessed by methods other than CT scan (chest radiography or bronchography), and most of these studies made no allowance for pathologic conditions that may lead to the development of bronchiectasis.17 Moreover, not all the patients had blood samples analyzed by isoelectric focusing; this is a very critical point because AAT serum concentrations may be influenced by sex or inflammatory conditions and have been found to slightly increase in deficient individuals. Inasmuch as AAT is an acute-phase reactant protein, its serum concentration may increase in patients with stable bronchiectasis as compared with control subjects.16 18 Therefore, because it is not possible to use AAT serum concentrations as a screening method for the diagnosis of AAT deficiency, we only included patients with electrophoretic analysis. In our opinion, only the study of Varpela et al15 can be considered an unselected and controlled study. In 60 consecutive patients with bronchiectasis, these authors did not find any homozygous Z patients but found a significant increase of PI*MZ patients as compared with control subjects. These data are critical because only phenotype distribution, not gene distribution, was evaluated. Groups other than MZ patients were not individualized.
As previously reported in a recent article,19 our study highlights the importance of bronchiectasis-associated emphysema. Emphysema is a confounding factor that may lead to bronchiectasis, but the presence of emphysema in bronchiectatic patients also is associated with an abnormal distribution of AAT alleles. Our data show that bronchiectatic patients without emphysema do not have a different AAT distribution as compared with control subjects in contrast to bronchiectatic patients with emphysema. This suggests that bronchiectasis may be a consequence of emphysema in PI*Z patients rather than a primary cause. The incidence of bronchiectasis in a population of emphysema patients without AAT deficiency is unknown, and it would be interesting to assess the incidence of bronchiectasis in a population of PI*Z patients without emphysema. Shin and Ho6 suggested that the sequential clinical expression of AAT deficiency may be emphysema alone, emphysema with chronic bronchitis, and emphysema with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. Indeed, most occurrences of bronchiectasis in patients with emphysema are thought to be secondary to matrix destruction and pressure loss. However, the same authors also described a 21-year-old AAT-deficient woman who developed bronchiectasis early in life before emphysematous changes appeared. Bronchiectasis may appear in AAT-deficient patients who are exposed to repeated pulmonary infections, even before the development of emphysema.6 Therefore, bronchiectasis in PI*Z patients may be caused by chronic bronchitis that is seen in emphysematous patients. Because approximately 50% of patients with AAT deficiency have symptoms of airway disease, especially chronic sputum production,12 it would be interesting to assess the improvement of such clinical symptoms in AAT-deficient patients receiving AAT substitution.
In conclusion, our comparative study does not provide any evidence that AAT deficiency may play a role in the pathophysiology of bronchiectasis.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1-antitrypsin; PI = protease inhibitor Received for publication January 20, 1999. Accepted for publication September 30, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Med 84,13-31[ISI][Medline]
1-antitrypsin deficiency in a young man. Thorax 50,424-425[Abstract]
1-Antitrypsin deficiency: evaluation of bronchiectasis with CT. Radiology 199,137-141
2 values using pseudo-probability tests [Letter]. J Hered 84,152
1-antitrypsin deficiency [letter]. Thorax 51,228
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S B Shaker, T Stavngaard, J Stolk, B Stoel, and A Dirksen {alpha}1-Antitrypsin deficiency {middle dot} 7: Computed tomographic imaging in {alpha}1-antitrypsin deficiency Thorax, November 1, 2004; 59(11): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D A Lomas and H Parfrey {alpha}1-Antitrypsin deficiency * 4: Molecular pathophysiology Thorax, June 1, 2004; 59(6): 529 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Needham and R A Stockley {alpha}1-Antitrypsin deficiency * 3: Clinical manifestations and natural history Thorax, May 1, 2004; 59(5): 441 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 818 - 900. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A PRIMHAK and M S TANNER Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2001; 85(1): 2 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |