|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Correspondence to: Romain Pauwels, MD, PhD, FCCP, Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000, Gent, Belgium; e-mail: romain.pauwels{at}rug.ac.be
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: COPD evidence-based medicine management guidelines
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The development of guidelines is a well-documented process, and the development is based, as far as possible, on evidence from well-controlled clinical studies. When there is insufficient evidence, we usually use a consensus from a number of experts in the field. The evidence-based guidelines are generally more acceptable than those formed from consensus opinion because modern medical practice requires that any treatment should have a clear scientific and clinical justification for its use. No guidelines can be useful unless there is a clear effort at implementation, but an evaluation of the impact of the guidelines on medical practice is rarely performed. The evaluation is not only important to determine the success of implementation, but is also useful for revision of the guidelines.
| The GOLD Initiative |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Recommendations of the GOLD Committee |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With regard to the diagnosis, it is clear that earlier detection of COPD is needed. Spirometry may be a poor screening tool because it is not sensitive or cost-effective enough. We propose starting the diagnosis with the presence of certain symptoms, including cough, sputum, dyspnea, and wheezing, with confirmation by measurement of lung function.
Although the definition of COPD states that airflow limitation is progressive and largely irreversible, most of the recommendations, including those from drug registration authorities, use FEV1 as the outcome measure.3 New outcome measures are needed, such as the decrease in exacerbations and hospitalizations. Other potential measures include the relief of symptoms, improvement in quality of life, inhibition of long-term lung function decline, increase in performance status, and increase in life expectancy.
The GOLD committee has developed preliminary recommendations for the management of COPD (Table 2) . The most important intervention in chronic COPD is smoking cessation. This is the only intervention proven at this time to affect long-term decline in FEV1. There is clear evidence that clinician-delivered support has an effect on the smoking-cessation rate, as does skills training and nicotine replacement therapy. There is increasing evidence that bupropion treatment actually helps to increase the smoking-cessation rate. A recent study compared placebo vs nicotine patch vs bupropion alone vs the combination of the nicotine patch and bupropion.4 The addition of bupropion to the treatment significantly increased the smoking-cessation rate.
|
The Lung Health Study shows that although regular treatment with the short-acting anticholinergic, ipratropium, does not inhibit the long-term decline in FEV1, it does not have a deleterious effect5 as has sometimes been claimed for the ß2-agonists in asthma. Generally, there is good evidence that nebulizer therapy is to be avoided for chronic treatment because of lack of cost-effectiveness. Several studies show that oral xanthines are effective bronchodilators in COPD. However, in countries in which inhaled therapies are available, they should be regarded as second-line option, because there is little evidence for an add-on effect and there is a high potential for toxicity and complications, and monitoring is needed. However, they may have a role in the treatment of advanced severe COPD.
Evidence about the role of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD is starting to accumulate. At the moment, corticosteroids should only be considered as a second-line treatment, and the exact indication remains to be determined. Both the EUROSCOP6 and ISOLDE7 studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids improve postbronchodilator FEV1. In addition, the studies showed that corticosteroids reduce exacerbation rate and that they inhibit the progressive loss of quality of life that is observed in COPD. However, there is no evidence for a long-term effect on the decline in FEV1. Oral corticosteroids are useful for the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD. Long-term treatment will only be considered after a trial has shown a beneficial effect that cannot be achieved with inhaled corticosteroids. There is clear evidence that the widespread use of a short course of oral corticosteroids to predict the response to inhaled corticosteroids is useless. If inhaled corticosteroids have no effect in advanced disease, the use of oral corticosteroids may be considered, but there is no evidence for an effect and a minimal dose must be used.
The committee has reviewed other interventions that are often used in the treatment of COPD. There is insufficient evidence that mucolytics, cromones, antibiotics, or antitussives are effective in COPD. There is good evidence to support the use of influenza vaccine, but a recent meta-analysis showed that Streptococcus pneumonia vaccination is probably not effective. Long-term oxygen therapy decreases mortality. There is good evidence for the usefulness of pulmonary rehabilitation in improving performance status. A large on-going study is evaluating lung volume reduction surgery and should provide evidence for its utility inasmuch as current evidence is limited. Similarly, there is only limited evidence for the efficacy of lung transplantation and for home ventilation. With regard to nutrition in COPD, there are really no good intervention studies with clinically relevant outcomes at this moment.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.L. Ayers, R. Mejia, J. Ward, T. Lentine, and D.A. Mahler Effectiveness of salmeterol versus ipratropium bromide on exertional dyspnoea in COPD Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2001; 17(6): 1132 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. D'Urzo, M. C. De Salvo, A. Ramirez-Rivera, J. Almeida, L. Sichletidis, G. Rapatz, and J. Kottakis In Patients With COPD, Treatment With a Combination of Formoterol and Ipratropium Is More Effective Than a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium : A 3-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Within-Patient, Multicenter Study Chest, May 1, 2001; 119(5): 1347 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. A. Calverley The Future for Tiotropium Chest, February 1, 2000; 117(2_suppl): 67S - 69S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |