|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Chest Service, CHU of Charleroi, Charleroi (Dr. Pierard); Departments of Internal Medicine (Drs. Berghmans and Sculier) and Pathology (Dr. Roufosse), Institut Bordet; and Chest Service (Drs. Vermylen and Ninane) and Thoracic Surgery Service (Dr. Bosschaerts), Saint-Pierre Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Correspondence to: V. Ninane, MD, Chest Service, Saint-Pierre Hospital, Rue Haute, 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for RVLC in the same University Hospital were prospectively evaluated before surgery by fluorescence bronchoscopy under local anesthesia to detect synchronous ROLC. All abnormal areas, with the exception of the RVLC, had biopsies made.
Results: From June 1996 to January 1999, 43 patients (male/female ratio: 1.7/1.0) were evaluated before lobectomy (n = 34) or pneumonectomy (n = 10) for 44 primary RVLC. There were 10 T1N0, 19 T2N0, 1 T1N1, 9 T2N1, 1 T3N0, 3 T1N2, and 1 T3N1 lesions. The histologic type was mainly squamous carcinoma (n = 21) and adenocarcinoma (n = 14). All but two patients were smokers or ex-smokers (mean ± SD, 48 ± 28 pack-years). A total of 177 endobronchial biopsies were performed (4.1 ± 2.5); 8 were too small to be informative, 43 showed non-preneoplastic alterations, and 50 were normal. There were 7 basal cell hyperplasias, 56 metaplasias, 9 dysplasias, and 4 carcinomas in situ (CIS). All the dysplasias and CIS lesions were observed in eight subjects. The synchronous CIS were treated by surgery (n = 1) or localized therapeutic modalities (n = 3).
Conclusions: The high prevalence of synchronous early lung cancers (9.3%) as well as metaplasia and dysplasia in this series of patients with resectable RVLC suggests that fluorescence bronchoscopy may be a useful adjunct in the preoperative evaluation of lung cancer.
Key Words: fluorescence bronchoscopy lung cancer roentgenographically occult lung cancer
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rate of second lung cancer after successful treatment of a first roentgenographically visible primary lung cancer (RVLC) is also elevated, with rates from 1 to 5% per year.8 9 10 11 12 13 The prevalence of ROLC synchronous to these RVLC, however, remains largely unknown. We postulated that this rate might not be negligible and that, after successful treatment of a first cancer, part of the second tumors might result from progressive evolution of synchronous, undetected preneoplastic lesions or ROLC. With this hypothesis in mind, we have assessed, with fluorescence bronchoscopy, patients with primary lung cancers before surgical resection. The technique of fluorescence bronchoscopy was chosen because it allows the detection of preneoplastic lesions and early lung cancers (CIS or microinvasive carcinoma) with a higher sensitivity than conventional white-light bronchoscopy.2
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fluorescence bronchoscopy (Olympus BF20D; Light Induced Fluorescence Endoscopy; Xillix LIFE Imaging system; Vancouver, Canada) was then performed while the patient was comfortably seated in a 30° recumbent position in a high-backed armchair. Oral consent was required before the procedure. Oxygen (2 L/min) was administered with nasal prongs throughout the procedure, and transcutaneous hemoglobin saturation and cardiac rhythm (Ohmeda Biox 3740; Louisville, CO) were continuously monitored. In the absence of contraindication, 0.5 mg of atropine sulfate was also administered IV.14 No sedative agent was administered, and the whole procedure was accomplished on an outpatient basis.15
Atomized lidocaine (10% solution) was administered to achieve upper airways anesthesia, and local anesthesia of the tracheobronchial tree was obtained by instillation of 2% lidocaine solution throughout the larynx with a curved needle. Supplemental doses of lidocaine solution were administered as required through the operating channel of the bronchoscope. The bronchoscope was always introduced through the mouth to avoid the risk of nasal bleeding that can interfere with fluorescence examination. The whole procedure always began with careful examination of the trachea and the bronchial tree up to the subsegmental divisions under white-light and was followed by fluorescence examination and then by biopsies of all the areas suspected of being preneoplastic lesions or CIS.2 15 Examination was performed by operators experienced with this technique who, most often, had not been involved in the first diagnostic or staging conventional white-light bronchoscopy. Changes that were considered abnormal during white-light bronchoscopy included areas presenting an increase in redness, or a thickening or irregularity of the mucosa as well as nodular or polypoid lesions. During fluorescence examination, all the areas with heterogeneous aspects or homogenous defects were considered as suspect. All biopsies were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and classified into the following categories: normal, reserve cell hyperplasia, metaplasia, dysplasia, or CIS.16 17 We also encountered pathologic lesions such as inflammation or scarring processes that were classified as non-preneoplastic changes.
Statistical assessments were made using
2
tests for homogeneity (categorical variables). Data are presented as
mean ± SD. The criterion for statistical significance was taken as
p < 0.05
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One may argue that the population studied was small. In fact, it is as large as the series that have allowed the establishment of the frequency of multicentric lesions of ROLC. Multiple synchronous ROLC cancers were indeed found in four patients (7%), as reported by Cortese and colleagues,4 and in seven patients (15%), as reported by Martini and Melamed.3 On this basis, we can also conclude that the prevalence of synchronous ROLC in our series of patients with resectable RVLC seems to be as high as the previously reported prevalence of synchronous multiple lung cancers of ROLC. Lam and colleagues,2 using fluorescence bronchoscopy in a group of 53 patients with known or suspected lung cancer, also found synchronous CIS in 15% of them, but the way this cohort was selected and the characteristics of the suspected or known lung cancers, including their clinical stage, were not defined. We do not think that the use of fluorescence bronchoscopy, a new diagnostic tool, is the sole explanation for the high prevalence of synchronous ROLC in the present study. In fact, it is likely that synchronous ROLC are most often underdiagnosed in cases of RVLC during white-light examination, at least in part, because the bronchoscopists attention is focused on histologic confirmation of the diagnosis and endobronchial delimitation of neoplastic extension. An additional reason may be related to the fact that not all bronchoscopists are trained in recognizing early lung cancers. Some observations from the present study indeed support this hypothesis. During the initial diagnostic or staging conventional white-light bronchoscopy, no additional endobronchial abnormalities suggestive of synchronous cancer had been reported by the bronchoscopists. The fluorescence procedure also included white-light examination immediately before fluorescence examination. Attention of our particularly trained bronchoscopists was now turned toward identification of early lesions synchronous to the RVLC, and three of the four ROLC already showed subtle abnormalities that were magnified by fluorescence examination (Fig 1) . The condition seems quite different in cases of ROLC suspected on the basis of positive sputum cytology. Bronchoscopic inspection for localization of ROLC is then probably performed with particular attention because it is also known that associated changes of the mucosa are most often subtle. Indeed, in the initial studies on ROLC,5 the first white-light bronchoscopy failed to reveal any abnormality suggestive of cancer in approximately 70% of patients with positive sputum cytology. Despite some progress in the detection of these early lung cancers in relationship with a better knowledge of their appearance, a recent study reported that more than one white-light bronchoscopy was still required to localize ROLC detected by positive sputum cytology in as many as 39% of the cases.19
The present findings also have potential clinical implications. After successful resection of a first RVLC, the rate of second tumor has been shown to be elevated, with rates ranging from 1 to 5% per year.8 9 10 11 12 13 Unfortunately, despite closer follow-up in these patients, a curative resection of second lung cancers can only be performed in 50% of the cases, mainly because of poor pulmonary function or dissemination at the time of diagnosis.20 There is thus a need for close and prolonged follow-up in these patients that would allow detection of second cancers at earlier stages, when local treatments may be applied with curative intent. The present findings suggest that detection of second cancers should be initiated at the time the first cancer is diagnosed. Indeed, in eight of the patients (19%), we found significant intraepithelial lesions (dysplasia and CIS) that might progress, in a proportion and with a rapidity that remain largely unknown, to invasive carcinoma.21 Some answers may in fact arise from a better knowledge of the molecular biology of pulmonary preneoplastic lesions. This is well illustrated by recent studies on the expression of Bcl-2, whose gene is involved in the regulation of apoptosis, showing that Bcl-2-positive ROLC had a better prognosis than Bcl-2-negative ROLC.22 Even if some data suggest that CIS may regress to normal mucosa,23 24 a therapeutic option was chosen in each of our cases. On the other hand, close follow-up with repeat fluorescence bronchoscopies and biopsies were performed in cases of dysplasia. Whether this strategy will effectively reduce the incidence of metachronous lung cancers (by curative treatment of synchronous ROLC) and increase the relative number of early stage metachronous lung cancers (by follow-up and detection of progression of preneoplastic lesions with fluorescence bronchoscopy) will, however, require further studies.
With the exception of one patient in whom localization of both ROLC and peripheral RVLC in the same lobe allowed resection of both cancers by lobectomy, localized therapeutic modalities were preferred. In two patients, additional pulmonary resection was, in fact, contraindicated because of poor lung function. Endobronchial brachytherapy was preferred to PDT in one of these two patients because of the important endobronchial longitudinal extent of the CIS that has been shown to be associated with decreased success of PDT.25 In the third patient, PDT was chosen as an alternative to surgery for at least three reasons. First, surgical resection of both lesions would have implied a right pneumonectomy, a procedure that is associated with a higher mortality rate (approximately 10%) than right upper lobectomy.26 Second, a lung function sparing procedure might be preferred in cases of ROLC because of the high incidence of metachronous lesions,5 6 and third, PDT might be a good alternative to surgery in ROLC,27 in particular in cases of CIS.
In conclusion, the present study has shown that, in patients with resectable RVLC, the prevalence of synchronous preneoplastic lesions and early lung cancers is high and that fluorescence bronchoscopy may be a useful adjunct in the clinical staging of these patients. Further studies are required to assess the effect of early detection and treatment of synchronous ROLC on the incidence of metachronous cancers in these patients and on survival.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by Grants 9.4587.95, 7.4523.96, and 7.4512.98 from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)-Télévie and by the Vésale Foundation, Belgium.
Received for publication April 13, 1999. Accepted for publication October 1, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Trisolini, D. Paioli, and M. Patelli Is Bronchoscopy Dangerous in the Pretreatment Workup of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients? Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1284 - 1284. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ruffini, M. Bongiovanni, A. Cavallo, P.L. Filosso, R. Giobbe, M. Mancuso, M. Molinatti, and A. Oliaro The significance of associated pre-invasive lesions in patients resected for primary lung neoplasms Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 165 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sutedja New techniques for early detection of lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2003; 21(39_suppl): 57S - 66s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Weigel, P. J. Kosco, S. Dacic, V. W. Rusch, R. J. Ginsberg, and J. D. Luketich Postoperative fluorescence bronchoscopic surveillance in non-small cell lung cancer patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 967 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |