|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Oral Surgery (Drs. Kato, Watanabe, Araki, and Tanzawa) and Anesthesiology (Drs. Isono, Tanaka, and Nishino), Chiba University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Correspondence to: Shiroh Isono, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Chiba University School of Medicine, 18-1 Inohana-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan; e-mail: isonos{at}ho.chiba-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Prospective, randomized study.
Setting: University hospital.
Patients: Thirty-seven adult patients with SDB.
Interventions: Oral appliances with 2-, 4-, and 6-mm advancement of the mandible.
Measurements and results: Overnight oximetry was performed with and without oral appliances. Each 2-mm mandibular advancement coincided with approximately 20% improvement in number and severity of nocturnal desaturations. Percentages of patients producing a > 50% improvement rate of the number of desaturations were 25%, 48%, and 65% with use of oral appliances with 2-, 4-, and 6-mm mandibular advancement, respectively. Static pharyngeal mechanics were evaluated in six completely paralyzed patients with SDB under general anesthesia with and without the oral appliances. Advancement of mandibular position was found to produce dose-dependent closing pressure reduction of all pharyngeal segments. Normalization of nocturnal oxygenation was associated with negative closing pressure, especially at the velopharynx.
Conclusions: We conclude that improvement of both nocturnal oxygenation and pharyngeal collapsibility significantly depends on the mandibular position.
Key Words: closing pressure mandibular position obstructive sleep apnea oral appliance pharynx
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Cessation of mechanical ventilation resulted in apnea because of complete muscle paralysis. Using a simple pressure-control system consisting of a blower, voltage slider, and water manometer, airway pressure (PAW) was immediately increased, then slowly reduced in steps of 1 cm H2O from 20 cm H2O to VP closing pressure (P'close), ie, the pressure at which the VP was observed to close completely. SaO2 remained > 95% throughout the apneic test, which lasted for 2 to 3 min in all subjects. The apneic tests were repeated without OA (control), and with OA2, OA4, and OA6. The order of the evaluating conditions was randomly selected by each subject. Measurements were made for the VP and OP, which allowed construction of the static pressurearea relationship of the visualized pharyngeal segment for each condition. The study was terminated with the administration of atropine (1 mg) and neostigmine (2 mg) to reverse muscle paralysis.
The measured cross-sectional area of each pharyngeal segment was
plotted as a function of PAW. Accuracy of the
cross-sectional area measurements was reported to be within
8%.4
5
6
Maximum area (Amax) was determined as the mean
value of the highest three PAW (18, 19, and 20 cm
H2O). As reported previously,5
6
the
pressure/area relationship of each pharyngeal segment was denoted as
the exponential function
![]() |
![]() |
Evaluation of Nocturnal Oxygenation
After acclimatization to the OAs, effects of each OA on
nocturnal oxygenation were assessed by home overnight oximetry. All
subjects were instructed to attach a finger probe of the oximeter
before sleep, and to remove the probe on awakening. Digital readings of
SaO2 and pulse rate were stored every
5 s in a memory card. The stored data were displayed on a computer
screen to check quality of the recordings. In addition to ODI and
CT90, mentioned above, the mean nadir
SaO2 was calculated by averaging the
nadir SaO2 values of all desaturation
events. Overnight oximetry was repeated for eight consecutive nights
with and without the OAs, and each condition was evaluated at two-night
intervals. The order of evaluation was randomly selected by each
patient. Oximetry was repeated when patients reported poor quality of
sleep and possible dislodging of the device during the study. Mean
values of the two-night recordings for each condition were used for
analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical significance of effects of dose-dependent mandibular
advancement on nocturnal oximetry variables and mechanical variables of
the pharynx were assessed by Friedman repeated measures analysis of
variance on ranks. Dunnetts method was used for comparison
between the control condition and other states. Correlation
between variables was performed by Spearman rank order test.
Results are expressed as median (95% confidence intervals). A
p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Limitation and Design of the Study
Because nocturnal oximetry was performed without EEG monitoring,
information regarding sleep staging while wearing the OA is unknown,
and improvement of oxygenation with OAs reported here is possibly a
result of increased awakening time stimulated by OAs or an oximetry
probe. To minimize the artificial improvement of nocturnal oxygenation,
at least a 4-week acclimatization period was set aside before
performing nocturnal oximetry. The mandible was advanced 2 mm weekly
while monitoring the patients acceptance to the advancement.
Furthermore, because the oximetry was performed at home without
attendance, potential dislodgment of the OA might have influenced the
results of the nocturnal oximetry. In the absence of an intraoral
compliance-monitoring chip, it is unknown what amount of time the OA
was actually seated with the patient asleep, which would have been a
more accurate measurement instead of total monitoring time, for
appropriate evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of the OA.
Effects of OAs on upper airway size have been evaluated by lateral cephalometry and pharyngeal endoscopy during wakefulness in previous studies.7 8 9 10 11 Because pharyngeal muscles actively contract during wakefulness, especially in patients with OSA,12 the pharyngeal size measured in these studies may not accurately represent airway dimensions during sleep, in which pharyngeal closure or narrowing occurs because of significant reduction of pharyngeal dilator muscle activities.13 It is our belief that the restoration mechanism of pharyngeal patency by oral devices can only be explored under elimination of the pharyngeal muscle activities. Our unique evaluation method for static mechanics of the passive pharynx was previously reported.4 5 6 Because administration of muscular blockade produces complete elimination of neuromuscular factors influencing pharyngeal patency, the intrinsic mechanical properties of the pharynx is represented by the pressurearea relationship of the pharynx. Accordingly, this is the first precise documentation of the mechanical influence of an oral device on the passive pharyngeal airway configuration.
Although the paralyzed pharynx does offer an appropriate model for assessing its intrinsic mechanical properties, pharyngeal behavior in this condition may differ from that during natural sleep. Therefore, the model may not allow investigation of all the mechanisms causing OSA and does not predict the severity of apnea during sleep. Furthermore, it does not take into account both possible chemoreflex modulation of the upper airway muscle activity and the effects of spontaneous respiration. Recent electromyographic recordings, however, demonstrated that genioglossus activities decrease with mandibular advancement during sleep,14 which suggests little contribution of pharyngeal muscles in restoring pharyngeal patency with mandibular advancement. Furthermore, our study did not assess the influence of the OA on breathing route. The dynamic influence of mandibular advancement on breathing during sleep needs to be examined in a future study.
To What Extent Should the Mandible Be Advanced for Treatment of
SDB?
Therapeutic effect of oral devices has been reported with
mandibular advancement of 3 to 7 mm from the neutral
position3
11
15
16
or > 75% of the maximum protrusive
position.17
These studies, however, only evaluated the
effect of OAs at a single mandibular position per patient, and did not
elucidate whether repositioning of the mandible resulted in an increase
or decrease in device efficacy. In our study, it was demonstrated that
improvement of nocturnal oxygenation depended on the extent of forward
mandibular displacement and that 20% improvement of nocturnal
oxygenation can be expected for each 2-mm anterior mandibular movement.
A 50% improvement of nocturnal oxygenation by OA4 suggests that
the therapeutic range of mandibular advancement appears to be > 4 mm,
in agreement with previous reports. However, it should also be noted
that obese patients with severe nocturnal desaturation did not
normalize oxygenation with a 6-mm mandibular advancement, although the
improvement rate did not significantly differ from that of less obese
patients. Accordingly, obese patients with severe nocturnal
desaturation may not be appropriate candidates for OA
therapy.18
Mechanical Action of OA on Pharyngeal Airway
Previous cephalometric analyses indicated that oral devices
capable of advancing the mandible increased the posterior airway space,
particularly at the soft palate level in patients with
OSA.7
8
9
In contrast, videoendoscopy of the pharynx during
wakefulness demonstrated that mandibular advancement significantly
increased anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area only at the
OP.10
Variability of the sites of action among these
studies can be accounted for by uncontrolled upper airway dilator
muscle activities. Response of the pharyngeal airway, already dilated
by active contraction of the upper airway muscles, to mandibular
advancement may not necessarily agree with that of the atonic pharynx
examined in this study.
From a consideration of anatomic arrangement of the upper airway, our results suggest several mechanisms for restoration of pharyngeal patency by mandibular advancement.4 6 Improvement of OP patency by forward mandibular displacement may be accomplished by anterior movement of the tongue base connected to the anterior inferior lingual portion of the mandible at the geniotubercles. Further, this tongue displacement would decrease the external pressure to the soft palate produced by posterior movement of the tongue base or stiffen the VP through the palatoglossal arch, which connects the tongue base to the lateral wall of the soft palate. This speculation may be supported by our finding that closing pressure at the VP as well as the oropharynx significantly decreased with mandibular advancement. Unfortunately, the influence of mandibular advancement on the airway patency at the level of the tip of the epiglottis (hypopharyngeal airway) was not systematically evaluated in this study. Because distance between the mandible and the hyoid bone is reported to decrease with an OA,11 the roles of hypopharyngeal airway patency on functioning mechanisms of the OA are necessary to be elucidated in the future.
Who Can Be Treated by OA?
The most collapsible site of airway is located at the VP in
patients with OSA during sleep, whereas the OP, although to a lesser
extent, also narrows.5
The entire pharynx, including the
VP and the OP, therefore, needs to be enlarged for effective treatment
with the OA. In accordance with our previous report,4
the
therapeutic range of mandibular advancement altered intrinsic
mechanical properties of the VP as well as those of the OP. In
addition, significant improvement of nocturnal oxygenation was achieved
only in patients whose closing pressure, mostly at the VP, was
decreased below atmospheric pressure by the OA as shown in Figure 2
.
Considering our previous report that normal subjects have
subatmospheric closing pressure of the passive pharynx and patients
with SDB have pressure above atmospheric pressure,5
the OA
appears to approximate the mechanical properties of the passive pharynx
of patients with SDB to those of normal subjects. Our results strongly
suggest that the key to successful treatment of SDB is improvement of
the VP patency. Because patients with severe desaturations during sleep
are likely to have higher closing pressure at the VP as we have
previously reported,5
failure of normalization of
nocturnal oxygenation by OA in this group of patients can possibly be
explained by insufficient improvement of the VP closing pressure by
mandibular advancement. Further, poor response to the OA in obese
patients with SDB may be caused by a lack of mechanical influence of
mandibular advancement on the VP as we previously
reported.6
Eveloff et al11
reported that the
soft palate length significantly differed between responders and
nonresponders to the OA, which suggests the importance of VP response.
Presence of severe OP and hypopharyngeal narrowing may be an
alternative explanation for the poor responses to the OAs. Increased
soft tissue elasticity of the tongue possibly limits mechanical
transmission of the mandibular advancement force to the base of the
tongue. Although further studies are necessary to establish a selection
criteria for an OA, evaluation of mechanical alteration of the passive
airway, particularly at the VP, by anterior movement of the mandible
could provide useful information for the selection.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 21, 1999. Accepted for publication November 5, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. P. Patil, H. Schneider, A. R. Schwartz, and P. L. Smith Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Pathophysiology and Diagnosis Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 325 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Coruzzi, M. Gualerzi, E. Bernkopf, L. Brambilla, V. Brambilla, V. Broia, C. Lombardi, and G. Parati Autonomic Cardiac Modulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Effect of an Oral Jaw-Positioning Appliance. Chest, November 1, 2006; 130(5): 1362 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Dort, E. Hadjuk, and J. E. Remmers Mandibular advancement and obstructive sleep apnoea: a method for determining effective mandibular protrusion. Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1003 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Ryan and T. D. Bradley Pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2440 - 2450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, D. P. White, and A. Malhotra The Impact of Anatomic Manipulations on Pharyngeal Collapse: Results From a Computational Model of the Normal Human Upper Airway Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1324 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Inazawa, T. Ayuse, S. Kurata, I. Okayasu, E. Sakamoto, K. Oi, H. Schneider, and A.R. Schwartz Effect of Mandibular Position on Upper Airway Collapsibility and Resistance J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2005; 84(6): 554 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hoekema, B. Stegenga, and L.G.M. de Bont EFFICACY AND CO-MORBIDITY OF ORAL APPLIANCES IN THE TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA-HYPOPNEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 137 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fleury, D. Rakotonanahary, B. Petelle, G. Vincent, N. P. Fleury, B. Meyer, and B. Lebeau Mandibular Advancement Titration for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Optimization of the Procedure by Combining Clinical and Oximetric Parameters Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1761 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marklund, H. Stenlund, and K. A. Franklin Mandibular Advancement Devices in 630 Men and Women With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring: Tolerability and Predictors of Treatment Success Chest, April 1, 2004; 125(4): 1270 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tsuiki, A.A. Lowe, F.R. Almeida, N. Kawahata, and J.A. Fleetham Effects of mandibular advancement on airway curvature and obstructive sleep apnoea severity Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2004; 23(2): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Schwab Pro: Sleep Apnea Is an Anatomic Disorder Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2003; 168(3): 270 - 271. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Brown Cephalometric Measurements and Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 765 - 768. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Dempsey, J. B. Skatrud, A. J. Jacques, S. J. Ewanowski, B. T. Woodson, P. R. Hanson, and B. Goodman Anatomic Determinants of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Across the Spectrum of Clinical and Nonclinical Male Subjects* Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 840 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.M. Sanner, M. Heise, B. Knoben, M. Machnick, U. Laufer, R. Kikuth, W. Zidek, and B. Hellmich MRI of the pharynx and treatment efficacy of a mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(1): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Petelle, G. Vincent, F. Gagnadoux, D. Rakotonanahary, B. Meyer, and B. Fleury One-Night Mandibular Advancement Titration for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome . A Pilot Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2002; 165(8): 1150 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R P Millman and C L Rosenberg Are oral appliances a substitute for nasal positive airway pressure? Thorax, April 1, 2002; 57(4): 283 - 284. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. WATANABE, S. ISONO, A. TANAKA, H. TANZAWA, and T. NISHINO Contribution of Body Habitus and Craniofacial Characteristics to Segmental Closing Pressures of the Passive Pharynx in Patients with Sleep-Disordered Breathing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2002; 165(2): 260 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |