|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Respiratory Medicine (Drs. Chauhan, Sridhar, and Marciniuk, and Mr. Clemens), Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, and the Faculty of Physical Activity Studies (Dr. Krishnan), University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; and the Department of Respiratory Medicine (Dr. Gallagher), St. Vincents Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Correspondence to: Darcy D. Marciniuk, MD, FCCP, Division of Respiratory Medicine, 5th Floor Ellis Hall, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N OW8; e-mail: darcy.marciniuk{at}skyway.usask.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Blinded subjects underwent two maximal incremental exercise tests in random order on an upright bicycle ergometer: one with and one without added dead space.
Setting: Tertiary-care university teaching hospital.
Subjects: Seven patients with stable chronic heart failure (mean ± SEM left ventricular ejection fraction, 27 ± 3%).
Results: Subjects were able to significantly increase their peak minute ventilation during exercise with added dead space when compared with control exercise (57.4 ± 5.9 vs 50.0 ± 5.6 L/min; p < 0.05). Peak oxygen uptake, workload, heart rate, and exercise duration were not significantly different between the added dead space and control tests. Breathing pattern was significantly deeper and slower at matched levels of ventilation during exercise with added dead space.
Conclusion: Because patients with chronic heart failure had significant ventilatory reserve at the end of exercise and were able to further increase their maximal minute ventilation, we conclude that respiratory function does not contribute to limitation of exercise in patients with chronic heart failure.
Key Words: breathing pattern chronic heart failure exercise ventilatory limitation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other studies have also suggested that respiratory function may
contribute to exercise limitation in chronic heart
failure.7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Patients with chronic heart failure have to
generate greater inspiratory muscle pressures during exercise compared
with normal humans.7
This is because of their increased
minute ventilation (
E)14
and, in some
patients, reduced lung compliance and increased airway
resistance.15
We and others have shown that inspiratory
muscle strength is frequently reduced in patients with chronic heart
failure or valvular heart disease.8
9
10
Therefore, the
stress on inspiratory muscles (ie, the pressure generated as
a fraction of pressure-generating capacity) is increased in chronic
heart failure patients during exercise.8
Studies using
near-infrared spectroscopy provide evidence of respiratory muscle
dysfunction during exercise in chronic heart failure.11
More important, Mancini et al12
13
reported improved
maximal exercise capacity in chronic heart failure patients after
respiratory muscle training and also after unloading the work of
breathing. However, recently, Dimopoulou et al16
concluded
that respiratory function is not the major determinant of exercise
capacity in stable chronic heart failure patients.
In view of these considerations and the conflicting results, we tested
the hypothesis that respiratory function contributes to limitation of
maximal incremental exercise performance in patients with stable
chronic heart failure. We used the technique of dead space
(VD) loading, which increases
E at a
given metabolic rate,17
to stress the respiratory system
during exercise. The principles and methods of VD loading
are described in greater detail in our previous
studies.17
18
19
We reasoned that if respiratory function
significantly contributes to exercise limitation in this population,
further increasing
E during exercise by
VD loading will result in a decrease in peak oxygen uptake
(
O2) and no increase in
E at the end of exercise.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
E or decreases exercise capacity
during incremental exercise in patients with stable chronic heart
failure. Patients performed two maximal incremental exercise tests on a
cycle ergometer (Godart; Utrecht, The Netherlands) in random order; one
was performed with added VD, and one without added
VD. Apart from the added VD, the two tests were
identical.
Patients
Patients were considered eligible for the study if they had
stable heart failure caused by a cardiomyopathy. Heart failure was
defined as symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction with a left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 0.45. Left ventricular
systolic dysfunction was documented by either two-dimensional
echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography. Stability was
defined as absence of change in symptoms, clinical status, or
medications in the preceding 2 months. Patients were excluded if they
had any pulmonary, rheumatologic, neuromuscular, peripheral vascular,
or any disease apart from heart failure that might impair exercise
tolerance. Patients were also excluded if they had angina pectoris or a
documented myocardial infarction in the preceding 6 months, or a viral
illness within the previous 6 weeks.
Equipment
Exercise was performed on an electrically braked cycle
ergometer. ECG leads were attached to monitor heart rate (HR) and ECG.
Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was
monitored continuously by pulse oximetry (N200; Nellcor; Hayward, CA).
Subjects breathed through a mouthpiece attached to a breathing valve.
Inspiratory flow was obtained from an inspiratory
pneumotachograph/transducer/demodulator system as described
previously.20
The inspiratory flow signal was integrated
to provide inspiratory volume. The expiratory line was connected to a
mixing chamber with baffles. Oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations
at the mouth and mixing chamber were measured by a mass spectrometer
(Airspec MGA 2000; Kent, UK). Sampling by the analyzer was alternated
between the mouthpiece and the mixing chamber to yield breath-by-breath
and mean expiratory concentrations, respectively.
Patients breathed through an added VD (measured by water displacement) placed between the mouthpiece and the breathing valve during the added VD test. The volume (~300 mL) was chosen, based on our previous studies, to be approximately 20% of peak exercise tidal volume (VT) during a preliminary practice test without added VD. Identical tubing was added to both the inspiratory and the expiratory lines of the breathing circuit during the control tests only so as to maintain identical breathing circuit resistance on the control and added VD days.21 The tubing arrangement was concealed in a rectangular box, and no patient was aware of the particular arrangement (added VD or control) during any exercise test. The resistance of the inspiratory and expiratory breathing circuit was < 1 cm H2O/L/s at flow rates up to 4 L/s.
All equipment was calibrated before each exercise test, and the calibration was rechecked immediately after the test.
Protocol
Each patient performed maximal incremental exercise on 2 days,
one with added VD and one without added VD
(control). The order of tests was randomized among subjects. The two
tests for a given subject were performed at the same time of day
separated by
48 h. Subjects were instructed not to have any
caffeinated drink or to eat for at least 2 h before testing, and
to avoid exercise on the day of testing.
After sitting on the cycle for at least 4 min, the patient started exercising at 10 W, and the work rate was increased by 10 W/min. Patients chose their own pedaling rate between 50 and 70 revolutions/min, with the help of tachometer feedback. All subjects were instructed in an identical manner by the same investigator for all exercise studies. They were told to exercise for as long as they could until they were unable to continue. No other form of encouragement was given to any subject. Each patient estimated the intensity of dyspnea and of leg effort at maximal exercise using the modified Borg scale.22 They were also asked after exercising which of these (or other) symptoms caused them to stop exercising. Spirometry was performed in all subjects before and immediately after each exercise test using recommended techniques.23 The highest values of three well-coordinated maximal efforts are reported both before and after exercise.
Data Analysis
E, VT, respiratory frequency (f),
O2, carbon dioxide output
(
CO2), and HR were calculated
using standard methods.
E and VT were
expressed at body temperature, pressure, saturated;
O2 and
CO2 were expressed at standard
temperature, pressure, dry. Data from the control and
added VD tests at end exercise were compared by paired
t tests. Measured variables at matched work rates during
exercise were compared by analysis of variance with repeated measures.
Analysis of Borg scale results was performed using Wilcoxons signed
rank test. A p < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.
Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Analysis of our study sample size showed that it could detect a 10%
fall in peak
O2 with a power
of 93%, and a 10% fall in exercise duration with a power of
97%.24
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 years. All
subjects completed both exercise tests without any complications, and
no exercise test was terminated by the physician. Subject
characteristics and maximal exercise data are presented in Table 1
.
|
O2 and HR at end exercise on
the control day were 67 ± 5% and 84 ± 4% of predicted,
respectively. Figure 1
compares
E, VT,
O2, and HR at end exercise in
the control study to those at end exercise with added VD.
Table 2
compares end-exercise variables in the control and VD
tests.
E and VT at end exercise were
significantly higher with added VD. The
VT/vital capacity (VC) ratio was 51.4 ± 4.6% at
end exercise in the control study, which is similar to that reported in
previous studies.20
25
The VT/VC ratio was
significantly higher with added VD. There was no
significant differences in
O2,
CO2, HR, exercise duration, or
work rate at end exercise between the two tests.
E/
O2 and
E/
CO2 were
elevated during control exercise26
and were significantly
higher with added VD than during control exercise. There
was no significant difference in f, end-tidal CO2
(PETCO2), or
SaO2 at end exercise between the two
tests.
|
|
Figure 2
shows
E throughout exercise for each subject in both
control and added VD studies. As expected,
E was higher throughout exercise with added
VD for all subjects. Figure 3
shows group mean results of
E, VT, f,
and PETCO2 throughout exercise.
E and VT were significantly higher
throughout exercise with added VD, but there was no
significant difference in f or PETCO2
throughout exercise.
|
|
O2,
CO2,
SaO2, and HR throughout exercise.
There was no significant difference in
O2,
CO2, or
SaO2 at any time. HR was slightly
greater at some, but not all, work rates with added VD.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
E, indicating that
respiratory function does not contribute to limitation of exercise in
chronic heart failure patients.
During control exercise, our chronic heart failure patients
demonstrated impaired exercise performance as evident by their low peak
O2. The ventilatory response
to exercise (ie,
E/
CO2)
was increased, and there was no desaturation during exercise. Peak
exercise VT was reduced, but the ratio of peak
exercise VT to VC was normal. These results are
consistent with previous studies of chronic heart failure
patients.1
2
25
26
27
28
Consistent with previous studies of normal humans and patients with
respiratory disease,17
18
19
29
added VD
resulted in an increased
E with no change in
O2 or
CO2 at a given work rate
during submaximal exercise. If respiratory function contributes to
exercise limitation, one would expect a fall in peak
O2 because of the respiratory
loading with added VD. This did not occur in this study.
There was no fall in peak
O2
because the chronic heart failure patients were able to increase their
E at end exercise compared with the control
situation. In other words, the ventilatory demands of exercise in
chronic heart failure patients can be significantly increased without
any impairment in maximal exercise performance. Therefore, the
respiratory system is not operating at its maximal capacity during
incremental exercise, and respiratory function does not contribute to
limitation of maximal exercise performance in patients with moderate
chronic heart failure. Similarly, VD loading during
incremental exercise in normal humans causes no impairment in exercise
capacity, but it does cause a significant increase in
E at maximal exercise.17
18
In
contrast, VD loading causes a reduction in peak
O2 with little or no increase
in
E at maximal exercise in patients with COPD or
those with interstitial lung disease.19
28
29
30
Exercise Limitation in Chronic Heart Failure
Mancini et al12
examined the effects of respiratory
muscle training on exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart
failure. Respiratory muscle function improved after training. They also
found an improvement in peak
O2 and
E
during incremental exercise after respiratory muscle training.
Therefore, the data of Mancini et al12
suggest that
respiratory muscle function may contribute to exercise limitation in
patients with chronic heart failure. How can we account for the
discrepancy between the results of Mancini et al12
and the
conclusions of this study? As emphasized by Mancini et
al12
and by Wilson,1
there was no true
control group in the former study; the control group was subjects who
dropped out of the training program. It is possible that the
improvements observed in their study were partly related to the careful
attention they received. Also, the improvement in peak
O2 in the study of Mancini et
al12
was accompanied by no change in peak HR. This is
suggestive of a generalized exercise training effect. This might have
resulted from the leg exercises that were part of the "breathing
calisthenics" during respiratory muscle training.
More recently, inspiring a helium/oxygen gas during exercise was found
to increase exercise duration and reduce dyspnea in chronic heart
failure patients with a mean LVEF of 0.19. However, importantly, peak
O2 and peak
E were unaffected by this intervention. Although the
authors concluded that respiratory function significantly contributes
to affect exercise performance in chronic heart failure patients, the
lack of a significant change in objective variables, such as
O2 or
E,
suggests that other mechanisms may have been responsible for the
observed improvement in exercise duration and dyspnea. This is
supported by the findings of Dimopoulou et al,16
who
examined the relationship between respiratory factors and
exercise performance in patients with stable chronic heart failure.
Although studied indirectly, they reported that lung function indexes
accounted for only ~30% of the variance in maximum exercise capacity
in chronic heart failure patients.
Study Limitations
We examined the role of respiratory function contributing to
limitation of maximal exercise tolerance in patients with stable
chronic heart failure. The determinants of peak performance and
endurance at submaximal exercise frequently
differ,28
30
31
32
and it is therefore possible that
respiratory function may contribute to the impairment of endurance
exercise performance in chronic heart failure. Similarly, this study
was not designed to examine whether respiratory function was normal, or
what degree of respiratory reserve was present in these subjects. In
addition, the conclusions of this study may not necessarily apply to
patients with unstable or more severe chronic heart failure, in whom
respiratory function might indeed contribute to exercise limitation.
Additional studies are needed to examine the importance of respiratory
function in exercise tolerance in these other populations.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
CO2 = carbon
dioxide output; VD = dead space;
E = minute ventilation;
O2 = oxygen uptake;
VT = tidal volume Supported by the Saskatchewan Lung Association, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Dr. Marciniuk is a Saskatchewan Lung Association Research Professor.
Received for publication September 13, 1999. Accepted for publication December 13, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K K A Witte, S D R Thackray, N P Nikitin, J G F Cleland, and A L Clark Pattern of ventilation during exercise in chronic heart failure Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 610 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2003; 167(2): 211 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |