|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||

*
From the Sections on Infectious Diseases (Drs. Núñez and Peacock) and Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Chin), Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Currently at Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/Sinesio Delgado, 10,
Madrid, Spain
Correspondence to: James E. Peacock, Jr, MD, Section on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1042; e-mail: jpeacock{at}wfubmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antifungal therapy cryptococcosis Cryptococcus neoformans fluconazole pneumonia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the infrequent occurrence of IPC, clinical data on its natural history and management are limited. Hammerman et al3 reviewed the accumulated experience with pulmonary cryptococcosis up to 1973 and concluded that the majority of cases resolved without antifungal therapy. Treatment was advocated only if there was evidence of disease progression or if the lesion, as observed radiographically, failed to resolve over a 1- to 2-month period of close observation. On the basis of a retrospective review of 41 patients, Kerkering and colleagues2 concluded that the natural history of untreated IPC in compromised hosts is extrapulmonic dissemination, whereas healthy hosts without evidence of dissemination generally exhibit a spontaneous resolution of the infection. As such, careful clinical observation without specific antifungal therapy usually has been advocated for healthy hosts with no evidence of extrapulmonary disease, a decision previously made easier by the lack of therapeutic options to parenteral amphotericin B with its associated toxicities.
With the current availability of oral triazoles with their excellent antifungal activity against C neoformans and their low potential for toxicity, impediments to therapy of cryptococcal pulmonary disease in healthy hosts seemingly have decreased. In fact, Dismukes4 has suggested that many investigators now advocate fluconazole therapy for all patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis, regardless of their underlying disease status. He does, however, acknowledge that no controlled clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate that management approach. Accordingly, it would appear appropriate to readdress the issue of therapy for IPC in the nonimmunocompromised host, especially in regard to indications (if any) for treatment and the role of oral agents, such as fluconazole, in management of the infection.
We report four cases of IPC in seemingly healthy hosts, each of whom was successfully treated with oral fluconazole. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to identify other reported cases of IPC in healthy hosts who were treated with fluconazole over the past decade.
| Case Reports |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Case 3
A 65-year-old man with a 5-week history of nonproductive,
disabling cough was found to have a large density in the right lower
lobe on CXR (Fig 2
,
top).
A 10 x 10.5 x 8.5-cm dense opacity was confirmed by chest CT
scan. A transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy was performed, revealing
granulomatous inflammation and cryptococcal-like organisms. The result
of the SCA test was positive at a titer of 1:64. The patient had no
neurologic symptoms and refused to undergo a lumbar puncture. The
result of the HIV antibody test was negative. Treatment with
fluconazole, 400 mg/d orally, was initiated. Subjective improvement in
the cough was noticed promptly thereafter. The patient received a
6-week course of therapy without side effects. A CXR after treatment
showed improvement of the infiltrate. The titers of SCA decreased
progressively and became negative 11 months after the initiation of
treatment. A follow-up CXR revealed only a residual scar (Fig 2
,
bottom). Now, > 2 years after completing therapy, the
patient remains well with no clinical evidence of relapsing
cryptococcosis (Table 1)
.
|
| Literature Review |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Four cases of IPC in immunocompetent hosts treated with fluconazole were described by Yew et al.7 One patient presented with chest pain and was found to have cavitary consolidation on CXR; IPC was an incidental finding in the other three patients (two with consolidation and one with a solitary cavitary lesion). All patients were initially treated with amphotericin B (average dose, 337.5 mg; dose range, 100 to 900 mg). Only after the patients developed adverse reactions to amphotericin B was fluconazole therapy initiated. The dosage of fluconazole was 600 mg/d orally for 4 to 5 weeks followed by 400 mg/d for 10 to 12 weeks. At the end of the treatment, follow-up CXRs revealed only minimal residual scarring, and all patients were relapse free during a follow-up period of 8 to 24 months. Unfortunately, prior administration of amphotericin B to those patients clouds the interpretation of the efficacy that is attributable to fluconazole, especially since radiographic findings were improving in each patient prior to the initiation of fluconazole therapy.
Several additional reports also contain references to patients with IPC who, purportedly, were treated with fluconazole, although the details in most of those reports are likewise limited. Liaw and colleagues,8 in investigating the diagnostic utility of direct determinations of cryptococcal antigen in transthoracic needle aspirates, identified seven immunocompetent patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis, six of whom had disease confined to the lung. Four patients were treated with oral fluconazole for 2 to 3 months (it is unclear which four patients) and had uneventful clearing of lesions from their chest radiographs. Robinson9 described a patient without predisposing conditions who developed severe cryptococcal pneumonia and died despite therapy with "large doses of amphotericin B and fluconazole." No further details about therapy were provided.
The Japanese literature contains a larger number of case reports of IPC treated with fluconazole.10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Unfortunately, the information provided in the English-language abstracts of those articles is limited. There is often no specific statement about the presence or absence of extrapulmonary involvement, and pulmonary manifestations of cryptococcosis in those patients receiving therapy were quite heterogeneous. In two cases, pulmonary involvement appeared to represent clinical pneumonia,15 16 whereas in eight cases it was an incidental finding.10 17 The nature of the pulmonary process is unknown in the remaining cases.11 12 13 14 18 Some patients were treated with fluconazole as monotherapy,10 11 12 13 14 17 while others received fluconazole in combination with miconazole or 5-flucytosine.12 15 16 17 18 Only Nakashima10 specified the dosage (400 mg/d) and duration (2 to 4 weeks) of the fluconazole therapy that was administered. Information regarding the responses to treatment for most patients is likewise limited. The results when fluconazole was used as monotherapy were described as "excellent,"10 "good in 2/5 and fair in 3/5 cases,"11 "clinical efficacy rate 100%,"14 "5090% improvement of shadows,"12 and "improvement"13 or "marked improvement of CXR findings."17 In the two cases of cryptococcal pneumonia,15 16 fluconazole was given in combination with other antifungal agents; the condition of one of the patients improved,16 but information on response of the other patient was not available.15
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although immunocompromised hosts are considered to be at greatest risk for the life-threatening complications of cryptococcal pulmonary infection,2 3 20 those complications also may occur in healthy hosts.2 3 20 Cases of overwhelming cryptococcal pneumonia with fatal outcome in immunocompetent patients, though unusual, have been reported.9 24 The dissemination of infection to the CNS in otherwise healthy hosts also occurs,2 3 20 even when the pulmonary process appears to be stable or resolving.3 However, there are few available studies to provide accurate information on the incidence of severe pneumonia or meningitis among healthy hosts with pulmonary cryptococcosis. In the retrospective review by Kerkering et al,2 17% of healthy hosts with untreated pulmonary cryptococcal infection developed CNS dissemination. More recently, Rozenbaum and Goncalves,27 in retrospectively studying 171 patients with cryptococcosis in Brazil, found that 69% of their 35 nonimmunosuppressed patients had concomitant pulmonary and CNS disease. Thus, the threat of CNS dissemination in healthy hosts with pulmonary cryptococcosis would appear to be very real.
Heretofore, the approach to management of pulmonary cryptococcosis has been predicated on the widely accepted belief that spontaneous resolution of infection is the rule for the majority of patients, especially in the absence of host immunocompromise.1 2 3 20 As initially espoused by Hammerman and colleagues3 and subsequently more clearly delineated by Kerkering et al,2 therapy generally has been withheld from healthy hosts with IPC with the expectation that infection will ultimately remit spontaneously without treatment and that severe infection including disseminated disease generally will not occur. As a consequence of the observations and recommendations of those authors, most healthy hosts diagnosed with IPC over the past several decades have not been treated.19 22 23 25 26
The recommendations of Hammerman et al3 and Kerkering et al2 notwithstanding, it would appear that selected healthy hosts with IPC might benefit from directed therapy, especially those patients with very prominent or disabling clinical symptoms (eg, our patients 3 and 4) or those patients potentially at risk for the development of severe disease. The rationale for treatment would, thus, be twofold: to promote the more rapid resolution of clinical symptoms and signs that may be disabling, and to prevent the development of potentially life-threatening complications such as diffuse pneumonia or CNS dissemination. Indeed, both Hammerman et al3 and Kerkering et al2 strongly assert that the morbidity and mortality from pulmonary cryptococcosis may be reduced if treatment is initiated before dissemination with meningeal involvement occurs.
Unfortunately, on the basis of the available data, it is difficult, if not impossible, to identify prospectively those healthy hosts with IPC who might benefit from "preemptive" therapy. Although it is logical to assume that treated patients with IPC would have a shorter duration of symptoms and signs than untreated patients, comparative data in that regard have not been published. In both of our symptomatic patients (patients 3 and 4), previously persistent and disabling symptoms such as fever and cough had largely resolved within 1 week of the initiation of fluconazole therapy. Unfortunately, the duration to time of resolution of the symptoms in untreated patients is not commented on by either Hammerman et al3 or Kerkering et al.2 Thus, there is no standard of comparison to assess the symptomatic benefit of antifungal therapy. As regards the identification of patients at risk for severe or disseminated disease, Hammerman and colleagues3 attempted to correlate the presence or absence of chest symptoms and the radiographic pattern of disease with the subsequent development of cryptococcal meningitis in surgically treated patients but could identify no correlation. Kerkering et al2 suggested that the presence of granuloma formation on lung histopathology was associated with a good prognosis and, thus, might speak against the need for therapy. However, the predictive value of that observation remains unproven, and tissue specimens from the lung are not available for all patients.
In the absence of well-defined clinical, radiographic, or pathologic criteria that might accurately identify patients at risk for debilitating symptoms, protracted disease, or severe infectious complications, the potential role for SCA titers in this setting as an aid to decision making is perhaps worthy of consideration. It is now well recognized that patients with IPC, presenting clinically either as pneumonia15 16 22 23 28 29 or with nodular lesions,23 may exhibit positive results in SCA tests. In the series by Yamaguchi et al,6 16 of 22 patients (73%) with IPC had positive results of SCA tests. Thus, in a patient with pulmonary cryptococcosis that is clinically confined to the lung, a positive SCA test result does not necessarily support a diagnosis of occult or evolving dissemination. However, in the patient with IPC, the SCA may serve as a marker of disease activity or overall organism burden. Therefore, it could be postulated that a positive SCA test result might reflect an increased risk for more severe local disease or for dissemination. At this point, however, that relationship remains unproven, and the utility of a positive SCA test result as a predictor of which patient with IPC might benefit from therapy is unknown.
Even if one accepts the premise that selected patients with IPC are deserving of therapy, firm guidelines for treatment are not available. However, with the availability of an easily administered and safe therapy, such as fluconazole, the indications for treatment of IPC perhaps should be reassessed. Certainly, on the basis of a limited number of uncontrolled studies,5 6 fluconazole appears to be effective in the treatment of cryptococcosis in non-HIV-infected patients. As such, several authors have suggested that fluconazole may be an appropriate therapy for IPC in healthy hosts.4 30 In fact, a retrospective review conducted by Pappas et al31 found that 49% of non-AIDS patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis were treated with fluconazole monotherapy even in the absence of published recommendations and guidelines.
A precise delineation of appropriate candidates for therapy has not yet been forthcoming. Kauffman30 recently has suggested that therapy with fluconazole may be indicated "for patients with pulmonary disease who have no meningeal or other organ involvement and who have mild to moderate symptoms." That recommendation does not differentiate between healthy hosts and those with immunocompromise of host defenses. Our observations and clinical experiences would support the use of fluconazole for those healthy hosts with IPC who have disabling symptoms or who exhibit multiple nodules or extensive infiltrates on chest radiographs. If a positive SCA test result proves to be a predictor of severe or complicated disease in healthy hosts with IPC, that parameter also could be utilized as a criterion for therapy.
Notwithstanding the difficulties in identifying appropriate candidates for therapy, the optimal dosage of fluconazole and the duration of therapy are also undefined. In the series reported by Dromer et al,5 the majority of patients received 4 to 6 weeks of therapy with fluconazole. However, Yew et al7 extended therapy to a minimum of 14 weeks. Kauffman30 acknowledged that the optimal duration of treatment for pulmonary cryptococcosis was not currently known but suggested that therapy should be continued until the CXR abnormalities resolve; for many patients, she projected that the duration of required treatment would be 3 to 6 months. Our four patients received 6 to 8 weeks of therapy with fluconazole, a duration in keeping with that used in the therapy of cryptococcal meningitis in non-HIV-infected patients. At the end of treatment, all our patients had exhibited demonstrable improvement in CXR findings and significant declines in SCA titers. To date and to our knowledge, with > 2 years of posttreatment follow-up for all patients, no case of relapsing infection has been documented.
Just as the duration of therapy is not known, the optimal fluconazole dosage has likewise not been defined. Dromer et al5 and Yamaguchi et al6 both employed a daily fluconazole dose of 200 to 400 mg, whereas Yew et al7 utilized an "induction" dose of 600 mg for 4 weeks, followed by 400 mg for 10 to 12 weeks. Our patients all received fluconazole, 400 mg/d, the "usual" dose also advocated by Kauffman.30 Clearly, additional data will be needed before a consensus opinion on dosage can be developed.
In summary, our observations and a limited number of reports in the literature5 6 7 suggest that fluconazole may be an effective therapy for IPC in the healthy host. Since fluconazole is well tolerated and has an excellent safety profile, it would seem appropriate to consider fluconazole as a therapeutic option in patients who have healthy immune function and IPC, with the goals of therapy being to accelerate the recovery from symptomatic disease and to prevent the development of severe local or disseminated infection. Appropriate candidates for treatment remain to be clearly defined but might include patients with persistent and/or disabling symptoms, those with multiple nodules or extensive infiltrates on CXRs, and/or, possibly, those with positive SCA test results. However, additional studies will be needed to determine more precisely the role of fluconazole in the treatment of IPC in immunocompetent patients as well as the optimal dosage and duration of that therapy.
Aberg and colleagues32 recently conducted a retrospective review of their experience with pulmonary cryptococcosis in patients who were not infected with HIV and concluded that immunocompetent hosts who were asymptomatic did not require antifungal therapy. However, they did recommend therapy for symptomatic patients, for patients with a positive SCA test result, and for patients with underlying immunologic disorders. Although none of their healthy hosts with pulmonary cryptococcosis were treated with fluconazole, they expressed the opinion that azole therapy was probably sufficient in most cases. In an accompanying editorial, Sarosi33 questioned the wisdom of observing immunocompetent patients without therapy, especially when the estimated risk of dissemination may be 12.5%, and suggests that therapy with fluconazole should be strongly considered given its relative lack of toxicity and probable efficacy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented in part at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Denver, CO, November 12 to 15, 1998.
Dr. Peacock owns a small amount of common stock in Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, the maker of fluconazole.
Received for publication November 19, 1999. Accepted for publication January 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-C. Chang, C. Tzao, H.-H. Hsu, S.-C. Lee, K.-L. Huang, H.-J. Tung, and C.-Y. Chen Pulmonary cryptococcosis: comparison of clinical and radiographic characteristics in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Chest, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 333 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Fox and N. L. Muller Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in Immunocompetent Patients: CT Findings in 12 Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 622 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jenney, K. Pandithage, D. A. Fisher, and B. J. Currie Cryptococcus Infection in Tropical Australia J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2004; 42(8): 3865 - 3868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Aberg Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in Normal Hosts: Treat or Observe? Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2049 - 2051. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. D'Souza, J. A. Alspaugh, C. Yue, T. Harashima, G. M. Cox, J. R. Perfect, and J. Heitman Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Controls Virulence of the Fungal Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 3179 - 3191. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |