|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine (Dr. Miyazawa), Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima; Department of Internal Medicine (Dr. Yamakido), Hiroshima University, Hiroshima; Department of Surgery (Dr. Ikeda), Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto; Department of Surgery (Dr. Furukawa), Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Department of Internal Medicine (Dr. Takiguchi), Chiba University, Chiba; Japan; Department of Surgery (Dr. Tada), Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka; and
Correspondence to: Teruomi Miyazawa, MD, FCCP, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hiroshima City Hospital 733, Moto-machi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8518 Japan; e-mail: ikyoku{at}city-hosp.naka.hiroshima.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design, setting, and patients: Between October 1997 and October 1998, we carried out a prospective multicenter study at six hospitals in Japan. Fifty-four Ultraflex stents were inserted in 34 patients with inoperable malignant airway stenosis using a flexible and/or a rigid bronchoscope under fluoroscopic and endoscopic visualization.
Measurements and results: Clinical, endoscopic examination, and pulmonary function on days 1, 30, and 60 after stent implantation showed improvement. In 19 patients (56%), stent implantation was performed as an emergency procedure because of life-threatening tracheobronchial obstruction. Immediate relief of dyspnea was achieved in 82% of the patients. The dyspnea index improved significantly after implantation (before vs days 1, 30, and 60; p < 0.001). Significant improvements were observed in obstruction of airway diameter (81 ± 15% before vs 14 ± 17% on day 1, 12 ± 12% on day 30, and 22 ± 28% on day 60; p < 0.001). Vital capacity (VC), FEV1, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased significantly after stent implantation: before vs immediately after VC (p < 0.01), FEV1 (p < 0.001), and PEF (p < 0.05). The main complications were tumor ingrowth (24%) and tumor overgrowth (21%). After coagulation with an Nd-YAG laser or argon plasma coagulation, mechanical coring out using the bevel of a rigid bronchoscope was necessary in patients showing tumor ingrowth or overgrowth. Removal and reposition were possible in case of misplacement. There were no problems with migration and retained secretions. The median survival time of patients was 3 months. The 1-year survival rate was 25.4%.
Conclusions: In this study of the Ultraflex nitinol stent, we have demonstrated that patients were relieved from dyspnea, which contributed to improved quality of life, with minimal complications. This stent can be used safely, even in the subglottic region. Owing to its excellent flexibility and biocompatibility, the stent is also indicated in certain complicated situations, eg, narrow stenosis, hourglass stenosis, curvilinear stenosis, bilateral mainstem bronchial stenoses, and long stenosis of varying diameters.
Key Words: malignant tracheobronchial stenosis nitinol stent Ultraflex stent
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Statistical Analysis
All analyses were performed using SAS software (Release 6.11;
SAS Institute; Cary, NC). The survival rate was compared using the
Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis and the log-rank test. Continuous
variables were tested by paired t test. A p value < 0.05
was considered to be significant. All results were presented as the
mean ± SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitinol is a nickel and titanium alloy that has various excellent properties, including superelasticity, biocompatibility, kink resistance, constancy of stress, physiologic compatibility, shape memory deployment, dynamic interference, and fatigue resistance.10 11 12 13 14 The elasticity of this alloy, which is 11%, biodynamically resembles that of the tracheobronchial tree most closely, and it is much greater as compared to stainless steel (0.5%).10
In stress-strain tests, biological tissues show a nonlinear behavior unlike artificial materials, called a hysteresis curve, because of biodynamic involvement of a time factor.13 That is, since biological materials show both viscous and elastic plasticity, expansion and returning to the starting point are somewhat delayed. Of all materials currently in use for tracheobronchial stenting, only nitinol shows a hysteresis curve that is very similar to elastic tissue such as the cartilages. By this property, the force exerted onto the airway wall by the stent does not increase even when coughing increases the compression power. This property of nitinol prevents damage of the mucosa. The Ultraflex stent thus may be considered a highly bioadaptable alloy because of its low resistance to cough but sufficient resistance to compression by tumors, thereby preventing reocclusion. In experiments of the stress-strain study performed by Freitag et al,14 the Gianturco stent,8 9 which is made of stainless steel, in contrast shows an exponential increase in power at a nonlinear slope. Therefore, this stent may perforate the airway wall and vessels due to its excessive force of expansion. Another metallic device, the Wallstent,17 which is made of a cobalt steel alloy, increases in length at both ends by 3 to 4 mm when compressed on coughing. Thus the sharp spikes at both ends of the stent almost regularly damage the mucosa and induce the formation of granulation tissue. The Strecker tantalum stent18 shows a plastic deformation at the nonlinear slope when pressure is strong. Also the Palmaz stent,19 which is made of stainless steel, shows a nonlinear and irregular slope and plastic deformation when a lateral strong pressure is applied. Thus both the Strecker and Palmaz stents are liable to collapse and are not suitable to maintain airway patency. In contrast, the Ultraflex stent has the least risk of perforation unlike the Gianturco stent, its length does not change as in the case of the Wallstent, and it does not collapse like the Strecker stent and Palmaz stent. Thus, the above complications are rare for the Ultraflex stent, compared with other metal stents.1 14
The strain of the Dumon stent,5 6 7 which is made of silicon, increases linearly following Hookes law; therefore, the expansion power depends on the stiffness of the material. The Dumon stent is known as the "gold standard" because it is economical, readjustment is simple, and removal or replacement is always possible. However, the Dumon stent shows complications such as stent migration and retained secretion inside the stent. Since the Ultraflex stent scarcely migrates, it can be used safely even if it has to be implanted in the subglottic region, where fixation of a Dumon stent is usually difficult. Compared to the Dumon stent, the Ultraflex stent is more flexible and the retention of secretions inside the stent is insignificant. As the walls are much thinner, more space is left for the lumen. Moreover, the uncovered Ultraflex stent may become epithelialized, potentially improving mucociliary clearance. Several weeks after stent implantation, the stent is covered by reactive metaplastic epithelial cells of squamous differentiation. Finally, the whole stent may become covered by a continuous layer of ciliated epithelium that provides an almost regular transport of the mucus.20 Thus, this stent can be implanted even in a long stenosis without minor risk of retention of secretions. As the wire mesh of the Ultraflex stent is flexible and expands actively, it fits advantageously to complex shapes such as narrow and curvilinear stenosis. For example, the stent fits even to the lumen of an hourglass-shaped stenosis to which the Dumon stent cannot fit due to tilting. The Ultraflex stent adapts better to bends and curvatures. In fact, in the present study, these stents could be implanted in complicated situations, such as long stenoses of varying diameters and bilateral bronchial stenoses. Consequently, most of the patients showed significant airway recanalization and improvement of dyspnea at a low complication rate.
Apart from the material and design of the Ultraflex stent, easy manipulation for implantation is another characteristic of this stent. Because of its new crochet knotting device, the Ultraflex stent can be implanted easily, not only using a rigid bronchoscope under general anesthesia like the Dumon stent, but also using a flexible bronchoscope under local anesthesia like that used for implantation of the Strecker stent and the Wallstent.18 21 22 23 If the stenosis is inaccessible to the rigid bronchoscope, the Ultraflex stent can be implanted using a flexible bronchoscope. As many pulmonologists using the flexible bronchoscope only are not trained with the rigid bronchoscope, this means that stent implantation can be added as an option in endobronchial treatment. As in this study, many serious cases were included; rigid bronchoscopes were used under general anesthesia to avoid risks in those patients. It is noteworthy, however, that stents were implanted using only a flexible bronchoscope in 60% of the cases studied. This stent can be released by pulling the thread. Unlike other expandable metal stents, this stent does not fully expand immediately after release, allowing time to readjust the position of the stent, if necessary. When the nylon thread at the distal end of the stent is pulled forward with a forceps, the distal end withers like the opening of a purse and can be positioned more distally. Similarly, the proximal end can be pulled up. Moreover, the stent can be easily removed before epithelialization has occurred. Other metal stents are very difficult if not impossible to extract in case of complications, even if they have not yet been covered by the mucosa. Although the Ultraflex stent is not clearly visible under fluoroscopy, it can be safely inserted by endoscopic control. Problems such as malfunction of the release mechanism or misplacement according to the markers rarely occurred in insertion without prior dilatation or laser resection of a stenosis. Positioning of the markers on the introducer catheter requires some improvement for stent placement under fluoroscopy. As recommended by Becker,16 however, there are fewer problems if after insertion using a guidewire, the position of the stent is adjusted before its complete release under direct visual monitoring through the flexible bronchoscope, which can be easily introduced parallel to the implantation device. Although the implanted stent is not clearly visualized by chest radiograph, it is possible, however, to check the stent position during follow-up. Furthermore, this stent is advantageous, in that it shows neither artifacts in CT nor problems with MRI, unlike the Gianturco stent and the Wallstent.24 However, although the gaps of the wire meshes are smaller than those of the Gianturco stent, tumor ingrowth can also occur through the meshes of the uncovered nitinol stent. Thus after coagulation with Nd-YAG laser or argon plasma coagulation, mechanical coring out using the bevel of a rigid bronchoscope was necessary in cases of tumor ingrowth or overgrowth. By applying covered Ultraflex stents that are now available for treatment in cases of exophytic tumor growth, granulation tissue, and fistulas, this complication can be prevented.
Implantation of the Ultraflex stent for palliative treatment of malignant airway stenoses should be considered when it has become clear from the endoscopic observation that this is feasible. In therapeutic bronchoscopy, we should use the type of stent that is best indicated for a specific situation. With this regard, the nitinol stent can be used in all localizations, even in the subglottic region, without risk of migration. Owing to its excellent flexibility and biocompatibility, this stent is also indicated in certain complicated situations, eg, narrow stenosis, hourglass stenosis, curvilinear stenosis, bilateral mainstem bronchial stenoses, and long stenosis of varying diameters. In this prospective multicenter study of this nitinol stent, we have demonstrated that patients were relieved from dyspnea, which contributed to improve their quality of life, with minimal complications.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Department of Surgery (Dr. Shirakusa), Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Received for publication October 20, 1999. Accepted for publication April 20, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ouellet, M. E. Dunn, B. Lussier, N. Chailleux, and P. Helie Noninvasive correction of a fractured endoluminal nitinol tracheal stent in a dog. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 42(6): 467 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Grewe, K. M. Muller, M. Lindstaedt, A. Germing, A. Muller, A. Mugge, and T. Deneke Reaction Patterns of the Tracheobronchial Wall to Implanted Noncovered Metal Stents Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 986 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lunn, D. Feller-Kopman, M. Wahidi, S. Ashiku, R. Thurer, and A. Ernst Endoscopic Removal of Metallic Airway Stents Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2106 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Pillai, J. Smith, A. Hasan, and D. Spencer Review of pediatric airway malacia and its management, with emphasis on stenting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 35 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Madden, J. E. S. Park, and A. Sheth Medium-Term Follow-Up After Deployment of Ultraflex Expandable Metallic Stents to Manage Endobronchial Pathology Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 1898 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Saito, K.-i. Minami, H. Kaneda, T. Okada, T. Maniwa, Y. Araki, H. Imamura, H. Yamada, K. Igaki, and H. Tamai New Tubular Bioabsorbable Knitted Airway Stent: Feasibility Assessment for Delivery and Deployment in a Dog Model Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1438 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iwamoto, T. Miyazawa, N. Kurimoto, Y. Miyazu, A. Ishida, K. Matsuo, and Y. Watanabe Interventional Bronchoscopy in the Management of Airway Stenosis Due to Tracheobronchial Tuberculosis Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1344 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dutau, B. Toutblanc, C. Lamb, and L. Seijo Use of the Dumon Y-stent in the Management of Malignant Disease Involving the Carina: A Retrospective Review of 86 Patients Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 951 - 958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ernst, D. Feller-Kopman, H. D. Becker, and A. C. Mehta Central Airway Obstruction Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2004; 169(12): 1278 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miyazu, T. Miyazawa, N. Kurimoto, Y. Iwamoto, A. Ishida, K. Kanoh, and N. Kohno Endobronchial Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Relapsing Polychondritis With Tracheobronchial Malacia Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2393 - 2395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Saad, S. Murthy, G. Krizmanich, and A. C. Mehta Self-Expandable Metallic Airway Stents and Flexible Bronchoscopy: Long-term Outcomes Analysis Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1993 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Beldholm, M. K. Wilson, R. M. Gallagher, D. Caminer, M. J. King, and A. Glanville Reconstruction of the trachea with a tubed radial forearm free flap J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 545 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kvale, M. Simoff, and U. B. S. Prakash Palliative Care Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 284S - 311S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Miyazawa, Y. Miyazu, Y. Iwamoto, A. Ishida, K. Kanoh, H. Sumiyoshi, M. Doi, and N. Kurimoto Stenting at the Flow-limiting Segment in Tracheobronchial Stenosis due to Lung Cancer Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2004; 169(10): 1096 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |