|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Medical City Dallas Hospital (Drs. Weill and Mack), Dallas; University of Texas (Drs. Roth and Swisher), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Introgen Therapeutics (Mr. Proksch and Dr. Merritt), Houston; and US Oncology (Dr. Nemunaitis), Dallas, TX.
Correspondence to: John Nemunaitis, MD, Associate Director, Clinical Research, 3535 Worth St, Collins Bldg, 5th Floor, Dallas, TX 75246; e-mail: John.Nemunaitis{at}USOncology.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dosing: This was a subset analysis of a phase I dose escalation trial.
Setting: Patients were treated in the outpatient clinics at the University of Texas (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) and at Medical City Dallas Hospital (US Oncology, Dallas, TX).
Patients: Twelve patients (median age, 60 years) with advanced endobronchial non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (squamous cell carcinoma, six patients; adenocarcinoma, six patients) were entered into trial. The median tumor area was 5 x 3.2 cm. All patient tumors contained a p53 gene mutation.
Interventions: Adp53 (dose range, 1 x 106 to 1 x 1011 plaque-forming units) was administered by bronchoscopic intratumoral injection once every 28 days.
Measurements and results: Toxicity attributed to the Adp53 vector was minimal. Six of the 12 patients had significant improvement in airway obstruction, and 3 patients met the criteria for partial response.
Conclusions: Direct bronchoscopic injection of Adp53 into endobronchial NSCLC is safe, with acceptable levels of toxicity. The initial clinical results demonstrating relief of airway obstruction warrant further clinical investigation.
Key Words: adenovirus lung cancer p53
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many prospective and retrospective studies have shown that local disease control improves survival. Therapeutic approaches involving obstructed bronchial airways have limited efficacy. Palliative management includes focal radiation therapy, brachytherapy, laser therapy, or chemotherapy. Symptoms such as hemoptysis, dyspnea, and chest pain often can be effectively palliated by external beam radiation.1 In a large study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, 24% of patients experienced complete relief of symptoms and an additional 47% had partial symptom relief.2 However, atelectasis, an indicator of airway obstruction, was relieved by external radiation in only 23 to 60% of patients.3 4 Endobronchial irradiation (or brachytherapy) involves either the surgical or bronchoscopic placement of a radioactive source near the tumor. Additionally, video-assisted thoracoscopic brachytherapy can be used to treat pleural and intrathoracic lesions. This therapy is particularly useful in patients whose disease has progressed despite aggressive external radiation treatment or in whom additional external radiation would not be well tolerated from a cardiopulmonary standpoint. In studies reviewing the efficacy of high-dose brachytherapy, the majority of the patients had a symptomatic response to the treatment. Hemoptysis, cough, and dyspnea were the most commonly relieved symptoms following brachytherapy. Complications were rare and included perforation, ulceration, and pulmonary hemorrhage.5
Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation can be used to restore potency to an airway obstructed by a central lesion. The majority of patients (68 to 93%) achieved a subjective response, although the duration of benefit is unclear.6 7 8 Complications include bronchial wall perforation, hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and esophageal-bronchial fistulas. Additionally, one disadvantage of therapy with light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation is the need for general anesthesia, with its attendant risks.
The most active single agent against NSCLC frequently used in combination chemotherapy approaches is cisplatin. Several new agents (vinorelbine tartrate, topotecan, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and docetaxel) have demonstrated activity in patients with NSCLC; however, the median survival time has not been improved, and toxicity due to the combination of these agents is significant. Patients with obstructed airways also have a high incidence of postobstructive pneumonia; thus, neutropenia induced by chemotherapy makes this approach less attractive.
The p53 gene, a tumor suppressor gene, is often rendered nonfunctional in human NSCLC by mutation or deletion.9 By restoring the expression of p53, it is postulated that tumor growth could be suppressed. Preclinical data suggest significant antitumor activity in patients with NSCLC who have had direct intratumoral injections with adenoviral-mediated p53 gene (Adp53) vector.10 11 Preclinical studies have reported the introduction of wild-type p53 into human tumor cells via a variety of delivery methods, including retroviral vectors, lipid complexes, and adenoviral vectors.10 11 These results have demonstrated expression of the transgene product and confirmed normal function of the expressed p53 protein, which caused tumor regression and survival improvement in animal models without adverse effects on nonmalignant tissues with normal p53 function. More than 60% of NSCLC samples tested at baseline show evidence of mutation to the p53 gene. It is expected that a greater proportion of samples have abnormal p53 function.
Initial trials using retroviral p53 gene transfer via intratumoral injection have not been associated with significant toxicity, and evidence of antitumor activity was demonstrated in three of nine patients with NSCLC.12 The three patients who responded had endobronchial disease and received the intratumoral injections via a bronchoscopic approach. Unfortunately, the low transduction efficiency associated with the retroviral vector was a major limiting factor. Recently, the direct intratumoral transfer of the p53 gene using an adenoviral vector was explored in 52 patients with NSCLC.13 14 The results of these studies suggested the safety of the procedure, evidence of transgene expression and function, and clinical activity. Additional benefit was observed in a subset of patients with endobronchial airway obstruction. The results for this subset of patients are described later in this article.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
This is an open-label, nonrandomized phase I escalation study.
Patients received Adp53 at dose levels of
1 x 106 to 1 x 1011
plaque-forming units (pfu). All patients treated were a subset of
patients participating in a larger nonrandomized phase I trial
involving Adp53 injection through CT-guided, ultrasound-guided, or
direct visual-guided injections, or through endobronchial-guided
injections.13
14
Patient clinical evaluation
criteria have been previously described.13
14
The cohort
of patients described herein are those who received endobronchial
injections. Each patient received an assigned dose throughout the
study. One course of treatment in the study consisted of a 28
(± 5)-day period (SE) during which patients were administered
80 mg/m2 of IV cisplatin, or no chemotherapy on
day 1, and study vector on day 4 for a total of up to six courses of
treatment. Treatment continues for as long as there is no progression
of the indicated lesion, no unacceptable adverse events, and no
additional anticancer therapy administered to the indicated lesion.
Vector Administration
Adp53 vector was administered by fine-needle injection directly
into the tumor. Administration was performed bronchoscopically.
Indicator lesions
4 cm in diameter were injected with a final
volume of 10 mL Adp53 vector. Indicator lesions with a diameter of
< 4 cm were administered a final volume of 3 mL Adp53 vector.
Adenoviral vector construction and safety assessment have been
previously described.13
14
Patient Population
Patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC who had
endobronchial tumors accessible through bronchoscopic examination were
enrolled. Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks and
a Zubrod performance status score
2 at the time of enrollment. All
patients were required to have p53 dysfunction demonstrated by tumor
DNA sequencing analysis or by elevated p53 expression demonstrated by
immunohistochemistry prior to treatment. Patients were required to have
adequate marrow (granulocyte count, > 2.0/µL), liver (bilirubin
level,
1.5 mg/dL), renal (creatinine level, < 1.5 mg/dL), and
respiratory (FEV1,
40% of the predicted
FEV1) function. Patients with symptomatic brain
metastases, patients who had used any investigational chemotherapy
agent within 4 weeks of study treatment, patients who had used
chemotherapy within 21 days prior to study treatment, and patients who
had used immunosuppressive therapy including corticosteroids were
excluded from trial. This trial was approved by the Texas Oncology,
P.A. Institutional Review Board, and participants were required to sign
a board-approved consent form.
Response Evaluation
Clinical signs and symptoms were assessed for each patient.
Biopsy specimens of indicator lesions were obtained for histologic
assessment of the response prior to each course of treatment and/or at
day 28. Patients were assigned a response category according to
the response criteria previously described.13
14
Additional criteria to evaluate activity in endobronchially injected
patients were applied as follows: bronchial airway obstruction was
visualized and photographed, and an increase in airway opening > 25%
was considered significant. An obstruction by lesions that inhibits air
passage through the bronchial airway, as determined by the lack of
bubbles when saline solution was placed at the site of the obstruction,
was considered a complete obstruction. An opening sufficient to allow
air passage, as witnessed on bronchoscopic video with two observations
or more of brisk bubbles on saline solution flush, was considered an
improvement.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The antitumor activity observed in this trial was consistent with
the activity observed with retroviral p53 injection in NSCLC patients.
Three of the six patients who had obstruction relief fulfilled the
criteria for the formal definition of partial response. By comparison,
only one partial response was observed in 40 patients who received
Adp53 via a nonbronchoscopic injection route.13
14
One
patient survived 619 days following the initial injection but
eventually died of recurrent disease. Our previous results have shown
that an increase in apoptosis was observed after treatment with Adp53
injection and that the mean apoptotic index was significantly higher at
follow-up of multiple injections.13
14
It is unclear why
endobronchially treated patients appear to show evidence of tumor
regression at higher frequencies than patients treated by
radiologic-guided injection. This may be related to a higher vector
dose load that patients treated bronchoscopically generally receive
(ie, 11 of 12 endobronchially treated patients received
3 x 109 pfu) or, possibly, to the larger
bulk of tumors that were not endobronchially accessible. It is
also unclear whether Adp53 actually enhances chemotherapy-induced
apoptosis or inhibits it through induction of p21-mediated growth
arrest. Further investigation will be required to address this issue.
Additionally, only one of five patients who received Adp53 alone
achieved endobronchial relief compared to five of seven patients who
received Adp53 plus cisplatin. This difference could be related to the
enhanced apoptotic activity of combination therapy with
Adp53.15
The antitumor activity and potential survival advantage observed in patients with endobronchial lesions may suggest that further exploration of the direct intratumoral injection of Adp53 into the endobronchial obstructing lesions containing a p53 mutation, particularly in patients who are not candidates for surgery, brachytherapy, or laser resection, is warranted. More objective measures of response such as actual measurement of the occluded airway opening with known dimension probes and repeat pulmonary function testing will be required.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 21, 2000. Accepted for publication May 2, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Barzon, M. Boscaro, and G. Palu Endocrine Aspects of Cancer Gene Therapy Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 1 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsuda, K. Yoshida, Y. Taya, K. Nakamura, Y. Nakamura, and H. Arakawa p53AIP1 Regulates the Mitochondrial Apoptotic Pathway Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(10): 2883 - 2889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |