|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Second Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Yoshikawa, Yoneda, Takenaka, Fukuoka, Okamoto, and Narita) and Department of Surgery III (Dr. Nezu), Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Correspondence to: Masanori Yoshikawa, MD, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan 634-8522
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Thirty-eight male outpatients with COPD
(mean ± SD FEV1, 47.4 ± 24.0% of predicted) who
underwent complete pulmonary function testing were classified into two
groups according to FEV1 expressed as a percentage of
predicted value. Group A comprised 21 patients with mild-to-moderate
airflow limitation (FEV1
35% predicted), and group B
comprised 17 patients with severe airflow limitation (FEV1
< 35% predicted). LBM, which represents skeletal muscle mass, was
measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and was assessed
separately in arms, legs, and trunk. Maximal oxygen uptake
(
O2max) was measured during maximal
exercise on a cycle ergometer.
Results: LBM in each
region was expressed as a percentage of ideal body weight (IBW). LBM in
arms (LBMarms)/IBW, LBMlegs/IBW, and LBM in trunk (LBMtrunk)/IBW were
significantly depleted in group B compared with group A (p < 0.01).
LBMlegs expressed as a percentage of total LBM (LBMlegs/total LBM) was
significantly lower in group B (p < 0.05), although there was no
significant difference in LBMarms/total LBM and LBMtrunk/total LBM
between the two groups.
O2max correlated
significantly with LBMlegs/IBW in group A, but not in group B. By
stepwise regression analysis, LBMlegs/IBW appeared to be a significant
predictor of
O2max in group A, while not
in group B.
Conclusion: LBMlegs was a significant predictor of maximal exercise performance in patients with mild-to-moderate airflow limitation, but not in patients with severe airflow limitation who had disproportional reduction in LBMlegs.
Key Words: body composition analysis COPD distribution of peripheral muscle mass dual energy x-ray absorptiometry maximal exercise performance
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peripheral muscle strength8 9 and oxidative capacity10 11 were found to be related to exercise performance in COPD patients. In contrast, no significant effect of strength training on exercise performance12 13 in COPD patients has been demonstrated. These data suggest that it is still unclear whether peripheral muscle function may determine the exercise performance in all patients with COPD, regardless of the severity.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the distribution of the reduction of LBM by DXA and to analyze the potential relationship between leg muscle mass and maximal exercise performance in COPD patients with various degrees of airflow limitation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patients were classified into two groups on the basis of
FEV1 as a percentage of predicted value, using
the criteria of the American Thoracic Society statement.14
Group A consisted of 21 patients with mild-to-moderate airflow
limitation in stage I or stage II (FEV1
35%
predicted). Group B consisted of 17 patients with severe airflow
limitation in stage III (FEV1 < 35%
predicted).
The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee for Protection of Human Subjects, Nara Medical University, according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All the subjects gave their informed consent prior to the initiation of the study.
Pulmonary Function Tests
All patients underwent pulmonary function testing. Vital
capacity (VC), FVC, FEV1, residual volume (RV),
total lung capacity (TLC), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were
measured using a pulmonary function instrument with computer processing
(FUDAC 70; Fukuda Denshi; Tokyo, Japan), and the
FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated. The values
obtained were compared to the normal values of Berglund and
coworkers.15
Lung volumes were determined by the helium
gas dilution method, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon
monoxide (DLCO) was measured by the single-breath method.
Body Composition Analysis
Body composition was measured by DXA with a total body scanner
(Lunar DPX; Lunar Radiation; Madison, WI) that uses a
constant-potential x-ray generator and a K-edge filter (cerium) to
separate the beam into high-energy and low-energy regions. The
attenuated x-rays that passed through the subjects were measured with
an energy-discriminating detector. The differential attenuation of the
two energies was used to estimate the bone mineral content and
soft-tissue mass. Bone mineral content and soft-tissue mass,
partitioned into fat mass and LBM, were calculated separately based on
the difference in mass attenuation coefficients. DXA makes it possible
to analyze each body composition in accurate and reproducible fashion
with very low radiation exposure.16
The entire scanning
from head to toe was usually completed within 15 min. LBM in
subregions, including trunk, arms, and legs, can be determined
separately as well as the whole body. LBM in trunk (LBMtrunk), LBM
in arms (LBMarms), and LBM in legs (LBMlegs) were normalized for
ideal body weight (IBW).17
LBM in each region, expressed
as a percentage of total LBM, LBMarms/total LBM, LBMlegs/total LBM, and
LBMtrunk/total LBM, was also investigated.
Exercise Performance
All patients underwent maximal exercise tests on a cycle
ergometer (STB-1350; Nihon Kohden; Tokyo, Japan). After 3 min of
unloaded pedaling, the workload was increased by 10 W/min in a ramp
protocol until exhaustion. Gas exchange was monitored during the
exercise test with a computerized metabolic cart (Vmax 229;
SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA). Minute ventilation
(
E), oxygen uptake, and carbon dioxide output were
measured by the breath-by-breath method. Arterial oxygen saturation was
also monitored using pulse oximetry (BSM-8500; Nihon Kohden; Tokyo,
Japan).
Statistical Analysis
Values obtained were expressed as mean ± SD. The differences
among measured parameters in the two groups were determined by unpaired
t tests. Pearsons correlation coefficients among static
lung function, LBM, and maximal oxygen uptake
(
O2max) were
calculated. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to
determine the best predictors of
O2max. LBMlegs/IBW
and pulmonary function, which showed significant correlation with
O2max, were selected
as independent variables in this analysis. The level of statistical
significance for each test was set as p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
E, maximal work rate, and
O2max in group B were
significantly lower than those in group A. Maximal
E/MVV was significantly higher in group B, while no
difference was observed in maximal heart rate as a percentage of
predicted between the two groups. There was no difference in arterial
oxygen desaturation during maximal exercise between the two groups.
|
O2max
O2max and pulmonary function
and LBM are shown in Table 4
.
FEV1, RV/TLC, and MVV correlated significantly
with
O2max in both groups.
Although total LBM/IBW and LBMlegs/IBW correlated significantly with
O2max in group A, they did not
have significant correlations with
O2max in group B.
|
O2max in total group
(r = 0.66, p < 0.0001; Fig 1
). In addition, there was no significant
correlation between LBMtrunk/IBW and
O2max in group A or
group B (p = 0.26 and p = 0.09, respectively; data not shown).
|
O2max (Table 5
). MVV and LBMlegs/IBW appeared to be
significant determinants of
O2max in group A. Total
variance explained in this model for
O2max was 77% in group A. In
contrast, LBMlegs/IBW was not selected as a significant predictor in
group B. Only 44% of total variance was explained in this model for
O2max.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DXA has been validated against independent methods, including
-neutronactivation model, total body potassium, and
hydrodensitometry, and is becoming one of the reference methods for
body composition analysis.18
BIA is an another recent
method of body composition analysis. Schols and coworkers5
have demonstrated that FFM measured by BIA, which was almost equivalent
to LBM, was a better indicator of body-mass depletion than body weight
in patients with clinically stable COPD. However, BIA was
reported to overestimate FFM.18
Furthermore,
whole-body DXA systems in contrast with BIA allow regional
measurements, and this permits separation of the extremity from the
trunk measurements. DXA makes it possible to quantify skeletal muscle
mass of the extremities, because the fat-free soft tissue of the
extremities is almost entirely skeletal muscle, except for a small
amount of skin connective tissues.
To investigate the distribution of muscle-mass wasting, LBM of each subregion expressed as a percentage of total LBM was evaluated. LBMlegs/total LBM was significantly reduced in patients with severe airflow limitation, while no significant difference in LBMtrunk/total LBM and LBMarms/total LBM between the two groups was observed. This finding may suggest that patients with severe disease exhibited disproportional leg muscle wasting. In states associated with simple muscle atrophy, such as nutritional depletion, the loss of upper-limb muscle function is equal to or greater than that of the lower limbs.19 However, the distribution of muscle wasting found in patients with severe disease who were more severely malnourished than those with mild-to-moderate disease is not consistent with atrophy induced by malnutrition. The disproportional leg muscle wasting in patients with severe disease may attribute to the limitation in their daily activity due to limited respiratory reserve.
In this study, a matched healthy control group was not included. As the absence of a control group has limited quantitative estimation of total LBM and distribution of LBM in each group, it is not clearly defined whether muscle wasting is also a characteristic of patients with mild-to-moderate COPD.
The impact of peripheral muscle function on exercise performance has
been investigated. Peripheral muscle weakness,8
9
reduction in oxidative enzyme activities,10
11
and a low
proportion of type I myosin heavy chain20
have been
reported to contribute to exercise intolerance in COPD. However, the
relationship between peripheral muscle mass and exercise performance
has not been clearly elucidated. In the present study, LBMlegs was
found to be a significant predictor of
O2max in patients with
mild-to-moderate COPD. This finding may be reasonable because the mass
of exercising muscles, as well as the dimensions of the cardiovascular
and pulmonary systems, should determine the maximal quantity of oxygen
that could be delivered and used.21
Excessive increase in blood lactic acid in COPD patients during
exercise compared with normal subjects is associated with exercise
limitation. Previously, a reduction in oxidative enzyme activity,
including citrate synthase and 3-hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase
in biopsy specimens from the quadriceps femoris
muscle10
11
and a strong correlation between the activity
of these enzymes and
O2max, have been
demonstrated.11
It is unclear whether a decrease in enzyme
activities may attribute to either a loss of muscle mass, to some
alteration in muscle structure, or to a combination of these two
mechanisms. Our data suggest that a loss of muscle mass may contribute
to the decrease in oxidative enzyme activity. In addition, Kutsuzawa
and coworkers22
found an early activation of anaerobic
glycolysis during exercise in patients with COPD and demonstrated a
significant correlation between indexes of this early activation and
muscle mass. Our observations are consistent with their statement that
muscle atrophy may contribute to the metabolic changes in muscles.
We previously reported that total LBM was a significant determinant of
O2max in stepwise regression
analysis in patients with COPD (mean FEV1,
49.8 ± 26.4% of predicted). However, LBM in each subregion was not
evaluated and the relation of leg muscle mass, which was mainly
recruited for cycle ergometer exercise, to
O2max was not investigated. In
the present study, an independent effect of leg muscle mass on
O2max was demonstrated in COPD
patients with mild-to-moderate airflow limitation, while not in
patients with severe disease. Furthermore, no significant correlation
between LBMtrunk/IBW and
O2max was observed in both
groups in this study. These data may suggest that LBM in each subregion
has a different effect on
O2max.
Several reports12
13
demonstrated that strength training
of leg muscles provided no significant improvements of
O2max and 6-min walk distance,
although it contributes to an increase in muscle strength. We found
that leg muscle mass was a significant predictor of
O2max in patients with
mild-to-moderate airflow limitation, but not in patients with severe
airflow limitation. Richardson and coworkers23
documented
that the patients with severe COPD had significant skeletal muscle
metabolic reserve at maximal exercise and concluded that reduced
whole-body exercise capacity was the result of central restraints,
rather than peripheral skeletal muscle dysfunction in these patients.
These findings suggest that it may depend on the severity of the
disease as to whether strength training of leg muscles can improve
O2max.
In addition, Berry and coworkers24
have shown that peak
oxygen consumption increased significantly after exercise training in
patients with mild COPD, while the increase was insignificant in
patients with moderate and severe COPD. A therapeutic approach to a
reduction of central restraints (ie, lung volume reduction
surgery) may be required for a substantial improvement of
O2max in patients
with severe airflow limitation.25
26
In conclusion, we found disproportional reduction of LBMlegs in COPD
patients with severe airflow limitation. However, LBMlegs was not a
significant predictor of
O2max
in these patients.
| Footnotes |
|---|
E = minute ventilation;
O2max = maximal oxygen uptake Received for publication January 24, 2000. Accepted for publication August 10, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.P. Mattson, M.D. Delp, and D.C. Poole Differential effects of emphysema on skeletal muscle fibre atrophy in hamsters Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2004; 23(5): 703 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |