|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Meakins-Christie Laboratories, and Montreal Chest Institute Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Correspondence to: Joseph Milic-Emili, MD, Meakins-Christie Laboratories, McGill University, 3626 St. Urbain St, Montreal, Quebec H2X 2P2, Canada; e-mail: milic{at}meakins.lan.mcgill.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: To study the role of tidal expiratory flow limitation (FL) in the genesis of orthopnea in patients with stable COPD.
Measurements: Tidal FL was assessed in 117 ambulatory COPD patients in sitting and supine positions using the negative expiratory pressure method. The presence or absence of orthopnea was also noted.
Results and conclusions: In patients with stable COPD with tidal expiratory FL in seated and/or supine position, there is a high prevalence of orthopnea, which probably results in part from increased inspiratory efforts due to dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation and the concomitant increase in inspiratory threshold load due to intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure. Increased airway resistance in supine position due to lower end-expiratory lung volume probably also plays a role in the genesis of orthopnea.
Key Words: inspiratory work intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure negative expiratory pressure method to detect flow limitation posture routine lung function
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FRC.6
7
As a result of dynamic hyperinflation, there is
a positive end-expiratory elastic recoil pressure, which has been
labeled intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), which acts
as an inspiratory threshold load.6
7
Dynamic
hyperinflation is associated with increased inspiratory work due to
PEEPi6
7
and impaired inspiratory muscle
function.8
These are probably the main causes of chronic
dyspnea in COPD patients.2
Patients with COPD often experience more severe dyspnea in supine than
in sitting positions, ie, orthopnea.9
10
The
nature of this phenomenon is not clear. Since in COPD patients
diaphragmatic function is probably not impaired in supine position
compared to sitting position, this cannot explain
orthopnea.11
12
In contrast, increased inspiratory work
due to PEEPi (WPEEPi) and airway resistance in supine position is a
more likely explanation. Since airway resistance increases with
decreasing lung volume,13
the lower FRC in supine
position5
should be associated with an augmented
inspiratory resistive work. Furthermore, in patients with
mild-to-moderate COPD, who during resting breathing exhibit expiratory
FL only in the supine position, the presence of WPEEPi in the supine
position should promote orthopnea. The same should also occur in
patients with severe COPD who exhibit tidal expiratory FL both seated
and supine. Indeed, while in such patients the end-expiratory lung
volume (EELV) during resting breathing is essentially the same in
seated and supine position,14
15
16
as a result of
gravitational factors the Vr is lower supine than
sitting.17
As a result, in COPD patients who are flow
limited both seated and supine, the
FRC and the WPEEPi should also
be greater in supine position, promoting orthopnea.
The present study was undertaken on 117 COPD patients to (1) assess if the prevalence of orthopnea is related to the presence of tidal expiratory FL in sitting and supine positions, and (2) to further characterize the relationship of orthopnea with other physiologic and clinical findings, in particular routine spirometric variables and heart disease (HD).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Expiratory FL
The experimental set-up used to assess tidal FL by negative
expiratory pressure (NEP) was similar to that described in detail
previously.2
All patients were studied both seated upright
in a comfortable chair and lying supine on a comfortable couch, in
random order. The pattern of breathing was continuously monitored on a
computer screen. After reaching steady-state breathing, we performed a
series of three to five test breaths in which NEP of - 5 cm
H2O was applied at the beginning of expiration
and maintained throughout expiration. These expiratory flow-volume
loops were compared by superimposition with those obtained during the
immediately preceding breaths. The volume signal was corrected for any
offset based on the assumption that inspired and expired volumes of the
preceding breath were identical.2
In the absence of
preexisting FL, the increase in pressure gradient between the alveoli
and the airway opening caused by NEP should result in increased
expiratory flow, whereas in flow-limited subjects, NEP should enhance
dynamic airway compression downstream from the flow-limiting segments,
without substantial effect on pressure or flow upstream. Accordingly,
in flow-limited subjects, expiratory flow does not change with NEP,
except for a brief flow transient (spike), which is thought to mainly
reflect sudden reduction in volume of the compliant oral and neck
structures. To a lesser extent, however, enhanced dynamic airway
compression and a small artifact caused by the common-mode rejection
ratio of the system for measuring flow also contributed to such flow
transients. In line with previous studies,2
4
after the
application of NEP, the expiratory flow either increased (reflecting
absence of FL) or did not change (reflecting presence of FL). There was
no instance in which application of NEP resulted in a sustained
decrease of expiratory flow below the corresponding control values as a
consequence of upper-airway collapse.
Subjects in whom the application of NEP did not elicit an increase of flow over all or part of the control tidal expiration were considered flow limited. By contrast, subjects in whom flow increased with NEP over the entire range of the control tidal expiration were considered as not flow limited (NFL). The degree of expiratory FL was assessed in terms of a 3-point FL score2 : score 0 = NFL both supine and seated; score 1 = FL when supine but not seated; and score 2 = FL both supine and seated. As previously described,2 3 we found that all COPD patients who had FL when seated also had FL when supine, while many COPD patients who had FL when supine were NFL when seated. With patients both seated and supine, the NEP tests were reproducible in the sense that each patient was classified as either FL or NFL on all three to five NEP tests performed in any given position.
During the application of NEP, air may leak around the lips into the expired line and contribute to the expiratory flow. Such leaks, however, are easily detected because they result in a sustained decrease of the EELV during the tidal breaths following NEP application. Accordingly, great care was taken to avoid such leaks by proper positioning of the mouthpiece and by asking the subjects to hold their lips tight.
Orthopnea
During the above session, the occurrence and the severity of
orthopnea were assessed by the following two questions: (1) "Do you
feel more breathless when you are lying on your back than when you are
seated?" Based on this question, the patients were classified into
two groups: group 0, patients who did not report orthopnea (by
answering No to the question); and group 1, patients who reported
orthopnea (by answering Yes to the question), (2) "How many pillows
do you use when sleeping?"
The reproducibility of the above two questions was assessed on a pilot study on 10 subjects. These subjects were chosen from the outpatient clinics of the Saint-Luc Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Five of them were selected based on a physicians diagnosis of stable COPD. The five other subjects chosen from the list of nonrespiratory outpatient clinics did not have any respiratory disease and did not complain of dyspnea. They were scheduled for two visits, 2 weeks apart.
They completed the FL measurements in seated and supine position and answered the above orthopnea questions. The reproducibility in this sample was 95%. The reproducibility of assessment of FL was also high, as previously reported.2
Statistical Analysis
Values reported in the text are means ± SD. Statistical
analysis was made using the unpaired t test, with the level
of significance set at p < 0.05. In addition, multiple logistic
regression analysis was used, as explained below.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the strength and significance of the 3-point FL score as potential risk factor for orthopnea. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), FEV1 (percent predicted), and presence of right heart disease (RHD) according to clinical history were taken as possible confounders. Age, BMI, and FEV1 (percent predicted) were treated as continuous covariables, while gender, RHD, and the 3-point FL score were expressed as categorical covariables. The logistic regression analysis was performed using statistical software (SPSS Statistical Package; SPSS; Chicago, IL). With this package, the first category is taken as a reference category for each categorical independent variable.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anthropometric and lung function data of the 117 COPD patients stratified according to presence or absence of orthopnea are shown in Table 1 . While age, height, and weight did not differ significantly between the two groups, the average BMI of the group without orthopnea was slightly though significantly different from that with orthopnea. The FEV1 percent of predicted was significantly lower in the patients with orthopnea, while no significant differences were found in either FVC or FEV1/FVC (percent predicted). The 3-point FL score was significantly higher in the orthopnea group.
Figure 1 A depicts the individual values of the 3-point FL score stratified according to the two orthopnea groups. Although most of the patients who reported orthopnea had FL when seated and/or supine (scores 1 or 2), there were nine patients who reported orthopnea in spite of the fact that they were NFL both seated and supine. Figure 1 , right, B depicts the individual values of the 3-point FL score after exclusion of the patients who had RHD. In this case, there were only four NFL patients left in the orthopnea group.
|
According to the multiple logistic regression analysis in Table 2 , the only variables significantly related to orthopnea were the 3-point FL score and HD, while FEV1 (percent predicted), age, gender, and BMI were found to carry no significant risk. However, when the logistic regression analysis was carried out by omitting the 3-point FL score, the FEV1 (percent predicted) was found to be significantly related to orthopnea, though the significance level was lower than that for the 3-point FL score (p < 0.05 vs 0.01). To the extent that FEV1 (percent predicted) is an indirect index of FL,2 after omission of the 3-point FL score a significant correlation was necessarily found between orthopnea and FEV1 (percent predicted).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The fact that patients with severe COPD may be FL during resting
breathing is well recognized, and the consequences in terms of dynamic
pulmonary hyperinflation, increased work of breathing, and impaired
inspiratory muscle function and hemodynamics have been well
documented.6
7
21
In a previous study, we have shown that
chronic dyspnea, as assessed with the modified Medical Research Council
scale, is more closely correlated with the degree of FL than with
routine lung function data.2
In the present study, we
found that orthopnea is more prevalent in patients with tidal FL (Fig 1)
. In COPD patients who are FL only in the supine position, the
inspiratory work of breathing would be expected to be higher when
supine than seated because of the additional WPEEPi and increased
airway resistance in the supine position.7
Accordingly,
the degree of dyspnea should be greater in the supine position. In this
connection, it should be noted that in some COPD patients receiving
mechanical ventilation, the degree of expiratory FL is reduced or
abolished by shifting from the supine to the semirecumbent position,
presumably because of increased EELV.22
In patients who
are FL in the sitting position, WPEEPi should also be greater in supine
than in the sitting position because of greater WPEEPi.2
3
In fact, in patients with severe COPD who presumably were FL both
seated and supine, the changes in FRC when shifting from seated to
supine position have been found to be either very small or
absent.5
14
Since, as a result of gravitational factors,
Vr is expected to be higher seated than supine,17
it
follows that the degree of dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation (
FRC)
and, hence, WPEEPi should be greater in the supine position. The
possible role of tidal FL in the genesis of orthopnea is supported by
two recent studies. Duguet and coworkers23
studied
patients with acute left heart failure (LHF), in whom orthopnea is a
clinical hallmark.9
As airway obstruction is common in
LHF, they hypothesized that postural aggravation of tidal FL could
contribute to LHF-related orthopnea. In 9 of 12 of their patients with
LHF, they observed that tidal FL was induced or aggravated by the
supine position and that this coincided with orthopnea. They concluded
that, in acute LHF, tidal FL is more frequent or prominent in the
supine position with a concomitant increase in PEEPi and hence in load
on the inspiratory muscles, contributing to orthopnea. Pankow and
coworkers24
assessed tidal FL and PEEPi in eight healthy
obese subjects in both sitting and supine position. In seven of these
subjects, they found that tidal FL and PEEPi were either induced or
aggravated by the supine position, with a concomitant increased load on
the diaphragm. Unfortunately, they did not assess orthopnea. Similar to
patients with acute LHF23
and obese
subjects,24
in many COPD patients tidal FL is either
induced or aggravated by the supine position,2
3
and may
contribute to orthopnea. However, other factors could contribute to
orthopnea. ODonnell and coworkers25
suggested that
flow-limiting dynamic airway compression may per se elicit
dyspnea. However, a recent study26
on normal subjects with
methacholine-induced tidal expiratory FL does not support this
hypothesis. On the other hand, there is evidence that expiratory FL
just precedes dependent airway closure (closing volume) at low flow
rates.27
This should lead to abnormal distribution of
ventilation within the lung with concomitant hypoxemia.28
While hypoxia per se may not cause dyspnea, it does increase
ventilation. This would increase the degree of expiratory FL, with a
concomitant increase in dynamic hyperinflation and PEEPi, enhancing
dyspnea in the supine position.
Although the 3-point FL score was significantly higher in the orthopnea group (Table 1) , 8% of the patients reported orthopnea in absence of FL (Fig 1 , left, A). This was due in part to the fact that our COPD population included patients with concurrent RHD. After exclusion of the HD patients (30%), only four of the COPD patients who were NFL did report orthopnea (Fig 1 , right, B). An association of orthopnea and tidal expiratory FL has been recently demonstrated in patients with acute LHF.23 None of our COPD patients, however, exhibited left ventricular dysfunction, which is a rare occurrence even in patients with severe airway obstruction.29
There was a significant difference in PaO2 and PaCO2 between the two orthopnea groups, which could be attributed in part to the fact that the patients with orthopnea had more severe COPD than the patients without orthopnea (Table 1) . The decreased PaO2 in the orthopnea group is predictable in view of the fact that these patients exhibited a more severe degree of FL than the nonorthopnea groups (Fig 1 , Table 1 ). Indeed, the onset of expiratory FL heralds peripheral airway closure in dependent lung zones27 with concomitant abnormality in ventilation distribution and gas exchange.28 An increased PaCO2 (p < 0.05) has been previously found in COPD patients with tidal FL both seated and supine.2 We also found a significant difference in BMI and FEV1 (percent predicted) between the two orthopnea groups (Table 1) . However, neither represented a significant risk for orthopnea according to the multiple logistic regression analysis in Table 2 . According to Table 2 , the 3-point FL score and HD were the only significant risk factors for orthopnea, with the former playing the main role. Indeed, the COPD patients who were FL both sitting and supine had a 32-fold greater risk of reporting orthopnea than the patients who were NFL. Though the HD covariable was not as strong and significant as the 3-point FL score, the COPD patients with right heart dysfunction had an almost threefold higher risk of reporting orthopnea than those without RHD.
When the 3-point FL score was omitted from the multiple logistic regression analysis, FEV1 (percent predicted) became a statistically significant risk factor for orthopnea, although at a lower level of significance than the 3-point FL score. This probably merely reflects the fact that FEV1 (percent predicted) is a poor, though significant, indirect index of FL.2
In conclusion, in patients with stable COPD with tidal expiratory FL in seated and/or supine position, there is a high prevalence of orthopnea, which may be due to increased inspiratory effort due to PEEPi and increased airway resistance in supine position. Further studies, including measurements of inspiratory work and its components, are required to explain orthopnea.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This study was supported by the J. Costello Memorial Research Fund, Royal Victoria Foundation, and the Montreal Chest Institute Research Center.
Received for publication February 10, 2000. Accepted for publication August 2, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Torchio, C. Gulotta, P. Greco-Lucchina, A. Perboni, L. Avonto, H. Ghezzo, and J. Milic-Emili Orthopnea and tidal expiratory flow limitation in chronic heart failure. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 472 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. A. Calverley and N. G. Koulouris Flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation: key concepts in modern respiratory physiology Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 186 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-H. Wang, P.-H. Kuo, C.-L. Hsu, H.-D. Wu, Y.-S. Chang, S.-H. Kuo, and P.-C. Yang Diagnostic Value of Negative Expiratory Pressure for Airway Hyperreactivity Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1762 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Torchio, C. Gulotta, A. Perboni, C. Ciacco, M. Guglielmo, F. Orlandi, and J. Milic-Emili Orthopnea and Tidal Expiratory Flow Limitation in Patients With Euthyroid Goiter Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |