|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
Correspondence to: James E. Dalen, MD, MPH, Master FCCP, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724-7384
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Task Force on Antithrombotic Therapy published the proceedings of their first consensus conference on antithrombotic therapy in 1986.1 The participants introduced a system of evidence that has served as a model for critically appraising the literature and has been adopted by many medical organizations. In the 14 years since the first conference, the field of antithrombotic therapy has witnessed enormous growth, due in part to the development of new and more powerful pharmacologic agents and in part to the evaluation of these agents in well-designed clinical trials. The proceedings of the sixth ACCP Consensus Conference provide an extensive critical review of the literature related to management of thromboembolic disorders, including venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and systemic arterial embolism. As in past reports, each section concludes with a detailed summary that documents the therapeutic recommendations, assigns a grade for each recommendation (1 or 2), and proffers the strength of the evidence on which the recommendations are based (A,B,C, or C+).
Major developments since the last conference, in 1998,2 include the following: the unequivocal demonstration that low doses of aspirin (80 to 325 mg) are at least as effective as higher doses (500 to 1000 mg) in cerebrovascular disease; confirmation of the new oral antiplatelet agent clopidogrel and of IV glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists as important antithrombotic agents; the lack of success of oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists in large clinical trials in myocardial ischemia; the demonstration that the synergistic effect between aspirin and ticlopidine, in patients with coronary stents, also holds for aspirin and clopidogrel; confirmation of low-molecular-weight heparin preparations as replacements for unfractionated heparin in acute coronary ischemic syndromes and venous thromboembolism; consolidation of the evidence that the lower limit of the therapeutic range for oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation is an international normalized ratio of 2.0; and failure to demonstrate a benefit of the combination of low-intensity warfarin (either fixed low dose or INR <2.0) and aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation.
| Grades of Recommendation for Antithrombotic Drugs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recommendation To Use or Not Use a Treatment
The recommendation to use (or not use) a particular treatment is
based on the trade-off between benefits on the one hand and risks
and/or costs on the other. If, after weighing all of the evidence, the
experts conclude that benefits outweigh risks and/or costs, then
treatment will be recommended; if the benefits do not outweigh risks
and/or costs, treatment will not be recommended. If experts are very
certain that benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, a grade 1
recommendation is made. If they are less certain of the trade-off
between benefits and risks, a weaker recommendation of grade 2 is made.
Methodologic Quality
There are four methodologic grades; grade A, B, C, and C+. Grade A
recommendations are based on randomized trials with consistent results;
grade B recommendations are made when randomized trials have
inconsistent results or have substantial methodologic weaknesses; and
grade C recommendations are based on observational studies or from
generalization from randomized trials from one group of patients to a
different group. When experts consider that the generalization from
randomized trials is secure, or that the data from observational
studies are overwhelming, then the grade C recommendation is upgraded
to grade C+.
In an ideal world, all our recommendations would be grade 1A, that is, a very strong recommendation based on the results of well-designed, randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) with consistent results. However, since warfarin, heparin, and aspirin were introduced to clinical use prior to the advent of the RCT, many of the indications for these agents are based on clinical observations without RCTs. Less than half of the recommendations in this sixth report of the ACCP Consensus Conference are based on the results of RCTs (A or B evidence). It is clear that recommendations based on B evidence and grade 2 recommendations need further trials or further evaluations of cost benefit. The C recommendations are fertile ground for further RCTs. Nearly all the recommendations for antithrombotic treatment in children are grade C, and as a result, many important RCTs in children have been initiated. Grade C+ recommendations may or may not require new RCTs. In most cases, grade C+ recommendations are based on compelling observational studies or secure generalizations from other RCTs, as in the case of warfarin treatment for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease complicated by atrial fibrillation.
The evolution of the recommendations of the ACCP Task Force on Antithrombotic Therapy from 1986 to 2000 illustrates the importance of RCTs on the emergence of evidence-based medical practice.
It is the hope of the participants of the ACCP Task Force on Antithrombotic Therapy that these guidelines will assist clinicians to prevent or effectively treat thrombotic disorders in their patients.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Burleigh, C. Wang, D. Foster, S. Heller, D. Dunn, K. Safavi, B. Griffin, and J. Smith Thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 15, 2006; 63(20 Suppl 6): S23 - S29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Stamou, K. G. Toutouzas, P. B. Kekis, S. Nakos, A. Gafou, A. Manouras, E. Krespis, S. Katsaragakis, and J. Bramis Prospective Study of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Postsplenectomy Thrombosis of the Portal, Mesenteric, and Splenic Veins Arch Surg, July 1, 2006; 141(7): 663 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-M. Zhou, W. Zhuang, J.-G. Hu, J.-M. Li, J.-F. Yu, and L. Jiang Low-Dose Anticoagulation in Chinese Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 341 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, E. B. Bass, and P. McKeown Methodological Approach: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 17S - 23S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Epstein, J. C. Alexander, D. D. Gutterman, W. Maisel, and J. M. Wharton Anticoagulation: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 24S - 27S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kagansky, H. Knobler, E. Rimon, Z. Ozer, and S. Levy Safety of Anticoagulation Therapy in Well-informed Older Patients Arch Intern Med, October 11, 2004; 164(18): 2044 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Gajic, J. Sprung, B. A. Hall, and D. J. Lightner Fatal Acute Pulmonary Embolism in a Patient with Pelvic Lipomatosis After Surgery Performed After Transatlantic Airplane Travel Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1032 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Creager, J. Goldstone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. Kazmers, K. C. Kent, B. H. Lorell, J. W. Olin, R. Rainer Pauly, K. Rosenfield, G. S. Roubin, et al. ACC/ACP/SCAI/SVMB/SVS clinical competence statement on vascular medicine and catheter-based peripheral vascular interventions : A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association/american college of physicianstask force on clinical competence (acc/acp/scai/svmb/svs writing committee to develop a clinical competence statement on peripheral vascular disease) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 941 - 957. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Creager ACC/ACP/SCAI/SVMB/SVS Clinical Competence statement: ACC/ACP/SCAI/SVMB/SVS Clinical Competence Statement on vascular medicine and catheter-based peripheral vascular interventions Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2004; 9(3): 233 - 248. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kuter Thrombotic Complications of Central Venous Catheters in Cancer Patients Oncologist, April 1, 2004; 9(2): 207 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. McNamara, L. J. Tamariz, J. B. Segal, and E. B. Bass Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Evidence for the Role of Pharmacologic Therapy, Electrical Cardioversion, and Echocardiography Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2003; 139(12): 1018 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A Nutescu, R. K Lewis, J. M Finley, and G. T Schumock Hospital Guidelines for Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2003; 37(7): 1072 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Raymond Getting a Leg Up on the Postthrombotic Syndrome Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 327 - 330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Lassen, L. C. Borris, and R. L. Nakov Use of the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Reviparin to Prevent Deep-Vein Thrombosis after Leg Injury Requiring Immobilization N. Engl. J. Med., September 5, 2002; 347(10): 726 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Zierler, M. H. Meissner, K. Cain, and D. E. Strandness Jr A Survey of Physicians' Knowledge and Management of Venous Thromboembolism Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, September 1, 2002; 36(5): 367 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Guidelines on Antithrombotic Therapy Journal Watch (General), March 16, 2001; 2001(316): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |