|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Medicine (Drs. Ferreira and Goldstein) and Physical Therapy (Dr. Brooks), the University of Toronto and Respiratory Medicine, West Park Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; and Centre de Pneumologie (Dr. Lacasse), Hopital Laval, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada.
Correspondence to: Ivone M. Ferreira, MD, PhD, c/o Dr. Roger Goldstein, West Park Hospital, 82 Buttonwood Ave, Toronto, Canada M6M 215; e-mail: ivoneferreira{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: RCTs were identified from several sources, including the Cochrane Airways Group register of RCTs, a hand search of abstracts presented at international meetings, and consultation with experts. Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed quality, and extracted the data.
Results: Twenty-one reports were classified according to the type, duration of supplementation, and the presence of anabolic substances. High carbohydrate meals were associated with an increase in carbon dioxide production and a decrease in exercise capacity. Short-term crossover studies in which diets of various compositions were administered supported the notion that high carbohydrate loads increase the stress on the ventilatory system. The influence of longer-term supplementation (> 2 weeks) on weight, anthropometry, and exercise capacity varied, without there being a consistent effect. Lean body weight was only occasionally reported and health-related quality of life too rarely to be included as an outcome. The influence of recombinant human growth hormone was disappointing. Anabolic steroids increased body weight and lean body mass, but had little influence on exercise capacity.
Conclusion: This systematic overview in patients with COPD supports the notion that those with marginal ventilatory reserve might benefit from a dietary regimen in which a high percentage of calories are supplied by fat. Although there are reports of the benefits of nutritional repletion, trials of > 2 weeks failed to show consistent benefit on body weight. Evaluating nutritional repletion is hampered by the absence of information regarding body composition, exercise, and health-related quality of life. Growth hormone has not been shown to be useful. Further studies are needed to refine the beneficial effects of anabolic steroids as adjunctive agents together with nutritional support and exercise.
Key Words: anabolic steroids COPD growth hormone nutrition respiratory rehabilitation systematic overview
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathophysiologic mechanisms that result in weight loss for patients
with COPD are not well understood. The many hypotheses include
inadequate dietary intake, increased resting energy expenditure (REE),
diet-induced thermogenesis, systemic inflammation, tissue hypoxia, and
medications.1
4
Patients are considered to be underweight
if their body weight is
90% than their ideal body weight (IBW;
1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance Tables10
), or if their
body mass index (BMI; weight/height squared) is < 20
kg/m2.11
Since weight and height do
not provide information on fat or fat-free mass (FFM), the latter is
often measured as part of a nutritional evaluation of patients with
COPD.3
12
A recent meta-analysis13 of studies on nutritional supplementation in COPD identified nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which nutritional supplementation was compared with usual clinical care. Nutritional supplementation was defined as caloric supplementation for at least 2 weeks. For each of the outcomes studied (anthropometric measures, pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity), the effect of nutritional support was homogeneously small.13
The effect of nutritional support in the management of patients with COPD continues to be of interest. In this overview, we reviewed prospective RCTs that provided information regarding the influence of nutritional support. We have included studies addressing the immediate effects of a meal, short-term (< 2 weeks) supplementation, supplementation of > 2 weeks, and supplementation by adjunctive treatments such as anabolic steroids and GH.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion Criteria
Two reviewers (I.M.F. and D.B.) independently selected trials
for inclusion in the review according to prior agreement regarding
definitions and interventions. Disagreement was solved after
consultation with a third reviewer (Y.L.). To be selected, trials had
to include stable patients among whom at least 75% had COPD
characterized by a FEV1 of < 70% predicted,
and < 15% reversibility after bronchodilator therapy.
Nutritional Supplementation
We required that subjects had been allocated to receive either
(1) oral, enteral, or parenteral nutritional intervention; or (2)
placebo, their usual diet, or other treatment regimens such as anabolic
substances. Studies involving patients with COPD undergoing treatment
in the ICU were excluded.
Outcomes
The primary outcomes consisted of anthropometric measures (body
weight, lean body mass, BMI) and functional exercise capacity (timed
walk test, submaximal or graded exercise). Other measures included
pulmonary mechanics (lung volumes, respiratory muscle function),
peripheral muscle function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
Data Extraction and Analysis
The data and trial quality information were extracted
independently by two reviewers (I.M.F., D.B.). The methodologic quality
of the trials was assessed using a validated instrument.14
This instrument contained items that assessed whether a study was truly
randomized, whether the study was described as blinded, and whether the
study provided detailed information regarding dropouts and withdrawals.
The study was scored within a range of 0 to 5, in which a score of
> 2 represented a higher-quality study and a score of < 2
represented a study of lower quality. Any missing data were requested
from the primary study investigators. Once the reviewers had reached
agreement regarding the quality score, the articles were classified and
grouped according to type and length of supplementation. Those studies
dealing with supplementation of > 2 weeks were grouped
separately.13
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 0.96) on nutrition and
COPD. When reviewed in detail, 21 reports were included. Both reviewers
agreed on all except four reports (
, 0.94; 95% confidence interval,
0.85 to 1.0), which were therefore sent to a third reviewer (Y.L.) for
arbitration. Reasons for excluding studies included the following:
uncontrolled study,8
15
16
17
18
19
no
randomization,20
21
investigations into weight loss
without nutritional support,22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
nutritional assessment
without nutritional support,2
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
subjects not meeting
eligibility criteria,42
43
44
45
and a second report of the
same trial. Reports were classified according to the type, duration of supplementation, and presence of anabolic substances (Table 1 ).
|
CO2) and respiratory quotient
(RQ) increased and exercise capacity decreased.47
48
50
The increased
CO2 and
ventilatory requirement was more marked following ingestion of a high
CHO load compared with a high fat load.47
48
50
When a
high-fat meal was compared with a moderate-fat meal, the former was
associated with a measurable delay in gastric emptying.49
Such a delay might, by extending the time of abdominal distension,
impact on the position and mobility of the diaphragm as well as the
lower thorax, which would have a negative impact among individuals in
whom respiratory function was already compromised.
|
Although the increase in
CO2 might aggravate those in
respiratory failure, in stable patients its effect was small and may be
of little clinical significance.49
Food ingestion may then
be more likely related to the load on the diaphragm than the
composition of the meal.51
Of note, postprandial exercise
was consistently reduced in each of these studies.
Short-term Effects (
2 Weeks)
Studies in which subjects were offered short-term supplementation
containing different percentages of fat and CHO52
53
54
are
summarized in Table 3
. Two reports used a similar design.52
54
Ambulatory
malnourished patients with emphysema and malnourished patients without
lung disease received hypercaloric diets high in either fat or CHO for
a week, then crossing over to the other limb in a randomized design. In
the third study,53
hypercapnic subjects were given low-,
medium-, or high-CHO diets for 5 days each in a randomized double-blind
trial. One of the studies54
measured the influence of diet
on submaximal exercise at a level comparable to daily activities (12 W
and 24 W). The findings by Angellilo et al53
and Goldstein
et al54
are consistent with studies of immediate effects
of a meal, showing that a high-fat diet places a lower demand on the
respiratory system than a diet high in CHO. Goldstein et
al54
noted small but consistent decreases in
CO2 (112 ± 9 to 95 ± 6
mL/min/m2), RQ (1.0 ± 0.02 to 0.86 ± 0.02), minute
ventilation (
E; 4.7 ± 0.1 to 4.0 ± 0.3
L/min/m2), and tidal volume (VT; 241 ± 15 to
193 ± 25 mL/m2) with the higher fat content. These
changes were mirrored among a control group of malnourished subjects
who did not have COPD. During exercise, both ventilation and
inspiratory flow (VT/inspiratory time) was greater in the
high-CHO group. Exercise efficiency increased with refeeding, with
further increases among those switching from low-fat to high-fat diets.
Weight gain occurred in both groups. Measures of nitrogen and energy
relationships in subjects who were malnourished (weight loss of 13 to
15% in the previous year, reduced creatinine/height
index)52
suggest that patients with emphysema are
hypermetabolic but in contrast to other patients are not hypercatabolic
nor do they show a preference for fat oxidation. Improved nutritional
status with both diets was reflected by a positive nitrogen balance
after 2 weeks, as well as comparable improvements in weight, arm
circumference, and total iron-binding capacity. Such changes were
accompanied by improvements in respiratory muscle strength and in
peripheral muscle endurance (quadriceps, hamstring, and
handgrip).52
CHO oxidation was higher in COPD,
irrespective of diet. The route of administration (parenteral vs oral)
had no effect on any of the measured metabolic
parameters.52
When energy and protein intake were supplied
in proportion to energy expenditure (1.7 x REE), energy balance and
nitrogen balance were similar in CHO or fat diets.
|
CO2 and
RQ compared with the high-CHO diet. They also noted a small but
significant increase in PaCO2 (from
47.5 ± 1.4 to 49.2 ± 1.6 mm Hg) as the CHO content increased from
low to moderate. Although the overall mean caloric intake over 15 days
was thought to be slightly higher than the measured requirements, these
authors report that their subjects experienced weight loss (values not
provided) that may be an important clinical limitation to this
approach.
Supplementation for > 2 Weeks
The results of nutritional supplementation beyond 2
weeks have varied (M. C. DeLetter, RN, PhD; unpublished data;
January 1999).55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Although nonsystematic reviews have
concluded that an increase in energy intake > 1.5 of the REE, or an
increase of 30% will result in weight gain,4
64
these
reviews were often based on trials that were not randomized or
controlled.4
64
The main findings from RCTs (M. C. DeLetter, RN, PhD; unpublished data; January 1999),55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 in which nutritional supplementation was maintained for at least 2 weeks identified no consistent effects on weight, anthropometric measures, or pulmonary function. Nine of these trials have been summarized in a previous meta-analysis.13 Adding 2 additional trials to the previous 9 trials, the 11 trials included 327 subjects randomized fairly equally between control and study groups. Most of the trials involved small numbers of subjects (< 30 subjects in all but two trials), with one trial in particular accounting for 135 subjects.63 Those who received nutritional supplementation gained just under 2 kg (1.87 ± 1.06 kg [SD]), whereas the weight of those in the control groups remained the same (- 0.03 ± 0.70). As with any intervention study, the issue of how the intervention was delivered is an important one. In eight of the trials, subjects received their nutritional intervention as outpatients, one trial included both inpatient and outpatient phases, and two trials were conducted with inpatients only. Supervision varied from daily dietary supervision to written instructions supported by two weekly visits to the patients home by a nurse. Some subjects were asked to keep daily records of their dietary intake, whereas others were supported by family members who were incorporated into the protocol and given written instructions as to how they could supervise the nutritional supplementation. Although measures of REE were not always provided, a good approximation was made using the Moore-Angellilo equation (11.5 x body weight + 952),64 given that most if not all subjects were male. Comparing the approximate REE with the prescribed nutritional protocols, the subjects (both nutritionally depleted and nondepleted) did receive the recommended caloric intake for weight gain (1.5 x REE). Although some did gain weight, it was due to a change in fat mass.16 58 63 Nutritional support alone was insufficient to promote significant overall weight gain in trials of individuals with COPD. However, lean body mass, the preferred measure of a positive energy balance, was reported in only two trials, and HRQL was reported too rarely even to be included as an outcome. Only one protocol included exercise as part of the overall management of COPD.63
Anabolic Steroids and GH
Anabolic Steroids:
Studies in which either anabolic
steroid63
65
or GH66
67
were administered are
summarized in Table 4
. All the studies of hormonal supplementation recruited patients
referred for respiratory rehabilitation. Whereas the exact program
details vary, patients were engaged in exercises such as treadmill,
cycle, swimming, or walking. The largest study63
began
with 217 male or female subjects who were stratified into depleted and
nondepleted groups at baseline according to body weight (< 90% IBW)
or FFM (< 67% in men and < 63% in women). Those who were depleted
had lower inspiratory pressures and lower 12-min walking distances than
those who were not. The REEs throughout the study were lower in the
depleted vs the nondepleted groups (range, 1,170 to 1,189 kcal depleted
vs 1,555 to 1,580 kcal nondepleted). The weight gains were similar
between those who received nutrition alone or those who received
nutrition plus anabolic steroids, although those who were depleted
(malnourished) gained more than those who were not depleted
(2.9 ± 2.9 kg in nutrition vs 2.4 ± 2.2 kg in nutrition and
anabolic steroid) or nourished (1.1 ± 2.4 kg in nutrition vs
1.2 ± 2.7 kg in nutrition and anabolic steroid). Moreover, patients
who had combined therapy (nutrition plus anabolic steroid) showed a
greater increase in FFM compared to those who received only nutritional
supplements in whom the weight gain was predominantly due to an
expansion of fat mass. A small increase in maximal inspiratory pressure
(PImax; 10.2 ± 1.9 kPa) was noted in only the combined
nutrition plus anabolic steroid group. This change was not
significantly different from the group who received only nutritional
supplementation. Both groups improved their 12-min walk distance,
although over a third of patients were too disabled to participate in a
walking test. No side effect was reported even in female patients, who
received half of the dose of that given to male
patients.63
|
GH:
Burdet and colleagues66
administered
recombinant human GH (rhGH) or placebo in a 3-week, double-blind,
randomized trial to 16 subjects (14 male and 2 female) with COPD who
were participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation program, provided
their baseline body weight was < 90% IBW. Lean body mass increased
(2.3 ± 1.6 kg in the rhGH group and 1.1 ± 0.9 kg in control
subjects) after 21 days, being sustained 2 months after cessation of
rhGH administration. There was no effect on respiratory muscle
strength, peripheral muscle strength, maximal power during incremental
exercise, or sensation of dyspnea. REE increased by 7.8% (p < 0.01)
in the study group at the end of 3 weeks, being identical to the
control group 2 months later. Caloric intake did not change with rhGH,
and there was no influence on body weight. The two groups had similar
pulmonary function and exercise characteristics at baseline and
throughout the study, with a trivial change in 6-min walk test in the
study group, which was unlikely to be clinically important
(13 ± 31%).
A similar protocol was reported by Casaburi et al67 in abstract form. Training was extended for 6 weeks among 29 subjects with moderately severe COPD who were randomized to receive GH plus training (12 subjects), GH plus placebo (12 subjects), or placebo alone (5 subjects). Levels of insulin-like growth factor were low initially and increased markedly from 110 ± 62 to 213 ± 81 ng/mL in the study group only. GH administration was associated with an increase in lean body mass of 6.4 ± 5.6% in the GH group compared with no change in the placebo group. Although muscle cross-sectional area increased 6.1 ± 2.5% in the study group vs 2.0 ± 2.5% in control subjects, this change was not associated with any improvement in exercise capacity tolerance by incremental or constant work-rate measures. No significant difference was noted in HRQL measure (measure not specified).
As with studies of anabolic steroids, GH has been associated with a number of undesirable side effects (salt and water retention, impairment of glucose metabolism, etc68 ), none of which were noted in the above two studies.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is likely that weight loss in COPD results from both a failure of the adaptive response to undernutrition and an inadequate dietary intake for the energy expenditure.71 Given the relationship between weight loss and tumor necrosis factor, several reports have postulated a contributory role of systemic inflammation to this catabolic response similar to the cachexia syndromes associated with heart failure and cystic fibrosis.72 73 74 Restoration of energy balance (positive nitrogen balance) by improved nutritional status following short-term supplementation is supported by weight gain, an increase in FFM, respiratory muscle function, and even in the immune response.59 Thus, short-term nutritional support may be an important clinical modality, as both skeletal and respiratory muscle strength improves in malnourished patients with lung disease.
Attention to the therapeutic implications of weight loss is relatively recent. Previously, this change was considered to be part of the terminal phase of COPD and therefore irreversible. The clinical importance of depletion of fat and muscle mass has been highlighted by the prevalence rates of 20% in stable outpatients and 50% in hospitalized patients with acute respiratory failure.1 In a article regarding the prognostic implications of body weight changes in COPD, Schols et al70 constructed two survival curves for such individuals. The first reflected a retrospective review of 400 rehabilitation patients with COPD, none of whom had been given nutritional supplementation. She noted that a low BMI, age, and PaO2 were significant independent predictors of mortality. When subjects were classified into quintiles based on BMI, a threshold value of 25 kg/m2 was identified, below which the mortality was clearly increased. Weight change entered as a time-dependant covariate remained an independent predictor of mortality in addition to all variables that were entered. The second survival curve was based on a post hoc analysis of the prospective RCT reviewed above (203 patients who received nutritional support alone or with anabolic steroids for an 8-week period). Among these subjects, weight gain of > 2 kg in 8 weeks in both depleted and nondepleted individuals as well as an increase in PImax were significant predictors of survival. Given the short treatment duration relative to follow-up, it is possible that a group of patients exist whose weight loss is more easily reversible following dietary counseling. The combined results of the two survival analyses further support the hypothesis that body weight has an independent effect on survival in COPD.70 The challenge is to identify an approach that will effectively influence FFM.
Nutritional supplementation is clearly feasible, especially in a rehabilitation unit63 where close supervision allows good control over caloric intake. Another advantage is that supplementation may be modified to be delivered to avoid a drop in the normal dietary intake as has been reported previously.57 It is also possible that the gain in FFM may be enhanced by the active participation in a respiratory rehabilitation program especially if the latter includes a substantial component of peripheral muscle training. Unfortunately, despite the encouraging results of short-term (< 2 weeks) studies, RCTs of nutritional support for > 2 weeks (16 days to 12 weeks) failed to show a consistent effect on weight. The absence of detailed information regarding body composition detracts from a clearer understanding of the influence of such nutritional support, as does the variable subject supervision. If nutritional supplements were associated with side effects such as bloating, fullness, or dyspnea, the subjects might well have been tempted to reduce the supplement or to reduce their usual nutritional intake, thus lessening their overall caloric intake. Whether or not the failure to reach a substantial gain in weight reflected a failure to provide sufficient nutritional support rather than a failure of the intervention is likely to be a subject of ongoing discussion. In a article75 characterizing those who responded poorly (< 2% weight gain) to 8 weeks of nutritional supplementation, the authors noted that nonresponse was associated with aging, relative anorexia, and an elevated systemic inflammatory response. Improved nutritional effectiveness will be contingent on a better understanding of the complex multifactorial metabolic issues associated with COPD.76
Early studies of anabolic substances to assist patients with wasting from nonrespiratory causes were limited by the outcome measures used and by the lack of distinction between malnourished and well-nourished individuals. Nutritional support alone may be insufficient in promoting substantial weight gain within the context of promoting FFM as opposed to fat mass.16 58 63 The mechanism by which anabolic steroids may be beneficial was not the topic of any of the RCTs reviewed. However, their influence on anabolic protein receptors and their inhibition of catabolism via glucocorticoid receptors77 may be especially useful as both free and bound testosterone decrease with age, and this decrease may be more pronounced in chronic conditions such as COPD.68 78
Potential side effects related with prolonged use of anabolic steroids are bile retention and gynecomastia in persons with previous liver damage, virilization in women, reduction in high-density lipoprotein, and alteration in glucose metabolism.68 There is no conclusive evidence linking malignancy to the use of anabolic steroids; however, these drugs stimulate the growth of already proven breast and prostatic cancer in men. An association with colonic and prostatic cancer has also been claimed, but never proven.68
Although GH can have a large effect on body composition, including
lipolysis, protein anabolism, and muscle growth, either directly or
through an insulin-like growth-factor hormone,68
the
studies by Burdet et al66
and Casaburi et
al,67
in keeping with other (uncontrolled)
studies,17
79
80
showed improvements in lean body mass
with no effect on peripheral or respiratory muscle strength or exercise
capacity. The absence of any change in HRQL was also important,
although disease-specific measures were not used. Potential side
effects of GH include local reaction, salt and water retention,
impairment of glucose metabolism, symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome,
gynecomastia,68
increase of oxygen consumption
(
O2) and
CO2, and decrease in exercise
performance.66
GHs are also expensive and available only
by injection.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
CO2 = carbon dioxide production;
E = minute ventilation;
O2 = oxygen consumption;
VT = tidal volume This study was made possible due funding from FAPESPFundacao de Amparo a pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brazil (IMF), Canadian Lung Association/MRC/Glaxo Welcome Postdoctoral fellowship (DB), and West Park Hospital Foundation.
Received for publication February 29, 2000. Accepted for publication September 7, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin deficiency. Respir Med 91,77-82[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
levels and weight loss in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150,1453-1455[Abstract]
production by peripheral blood monocytes of weight-losing COPD patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153,633-637[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Ries, G. S. Bauldoff, B. W. Carlin, R. Casaburi, C. F. Emery, D. A. Mahler, B. Make, C. L. Rochester, R. ZuWallack, and C. Herrerias Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5_suppl): 4S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Malone The Use of Specialized Enteral Formulas in Pulmonary Disease Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2004; 19(6): 557 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.M.W.J. Schols Nutritional and metabolic modulation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management Eur. Respir. J., November 2, 2003; 22(46_suppl): 81S - 86s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||