|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Medicine (Drs. Kowallik, Jacobi, Jirmann, Meesmann, and Schmidt), University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Wirtz), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Correspondence to: Peter Kowallik, MD, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany; e-mail: kowallik{at}mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study objective: To analyze the degree of breathing disturbance during nonocclusion.
Design: Prospective determination of breathing variability during full polysomnographic sleep studies.
Patients: Breath-to-breath variation was monitored in 34 patients with OSA and in 9 healthy subjects.
Measurements and results: All breath-to-breath intervals were automatically analyzed from flow signal, displayed, and manually corrected for artifacts. Distribution of all nonapneic breath intervals was analyzed for the extent of difference from a normal distribution pattern by specifying kurtosis. In untreated OSA patients, kurtosis was significantly reduced (0.0 ± 0.5, mean ± SD) compared to control subjects (0.8 ± 0.5), indicating increased variability of nonoccluded breathing. This effect was present in all sleep stages, and the extent depended significantly on the degree of disease. Continuous positive airway pressure breathing was able to normalize kurtosis (1.0 ± 0.9) immediately.
Conclusions: Breathing in OSA is not only characterized by interruptions of breathing during occlusion, but by a greater variation in the pattern of normal-length breaths.
Key Words: airflow obstruction breathing variability continuous positive airway pressure obstructive sleep apnea
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this study was to verify whether or not breath cycle-length variability, readily determined by standard thermistor flow-sensor equipment, is significantly different in OSA patients compared to healthy control subjects, and whether or not it correlates with the extent of OSA estimated by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study Protocol
Patients as well as healthy subjects underwent a full-night
polysomnographic sleep study. Patients in whom OSA was diagnosed and
who received continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment
underwent a second polysomnographic study the next night.
Polysomnography
Polysomnography was performed for 8 h during the night
(Sleep Lab 1000 P; Jäger-Tönnies). Fourteen channels were
recorded continuously: airflow signal (32-Hz sampling rate) recorded by
a nasal/oral thermistor flow sensor (Jäger-Tönnies), two
EEG channels, two electromyogram channels, two electro-oculogram
channels, one channel recording limb activity, one channel recording
body position, two channels recording thoracic and abdominal effort,
one channel recording snoring, one channel recording transdermal oxygen
saturation, and one ECG channel.
Therapy
Patients with an AHI of > 30, or an AHI > 5 and a
history of symptoms typical for sleep apnea, received treatment with
CPAP (Somnotron 2; Weinman; Hamburg, Germany) if they consented to this
kind of treatment, as recently recommended in a consensus
statement.14
A nasal CPAP mask was fitted, and the
effective pressure individually determined for each of these seven
patients. Starting from a pressure of 5 millibars (5.1 cm
H2O), the CPAP pressure was increased by 1
millibar (1.02 cm H2O) whenever there was
more than one significant fall in oxygen saturation, apnea, or
hypopnea.14
When this did not occur for 1 h, pressure
was slowly decreased until desaturations reappeared, in which case
pressure was increased again.
Data Analysis
Polysomnographic Sleep Study:
Evaluation of the sleep
studies were done according to guidelines.15
16
Sleep
stage was defined according to standard criteria15
and
grouped into four different levels: awake, rapid eye movement (REM),
sleep stages 1 and 2, and sleep stages 3 and 4. Hypopnea was determined
as a reduction in the flow signal of > 50%, lasting > 10 s and
causing a decrease in the oxygen saturation of
> 4%.2
17
18
Apnea was defined as an interruption of
the flow signal for a duration of at least 10 s.2
17
The number of apneas and hypopneas were calculated to obtain the AHI.
Results of the polysomnographic sleep study are shown in Table 1
.
Flow Signal:
Analysis was performed off-line. Data were
exported in raw format and further processed using software specially
developed for this study by one of the authors. The digitized flow
signal was extracted from the raw data file of the sleep study.
Flow-signal minima were identified automatically. The distance between
two minima was taken as the duration of one breath. This marker was
used instead of zero flow, because mimima were more reliable to detect,
compared to the onset of flow. All breath-to-breath intervals were
determined and displayed (Fig 1
). The actual flow signals of all breaths were scanned on a monitor, and
artifacts were corrected manually.
|
The kurtosis of a distribution compares the shape of a distribution to a normal distribution (ie, the fact whether the distribution curve is more flat or more pointed, compared to a normal distribution).19 If the distribution is normal, the value of kurtosis is, by definition, zero. A positive value of kurtosis indicates a sharp peak with longer tails including only few cases. That is, individual values are crowded together around the mean. A negative value indicates that the peak is flattened, compared to a normal distribution with many cases widely apart from the mean.
Statistical analysis was performed using commercial software (Systat 7.0.1 for Windows; SPSS; Chicago, IL). Data of measurements for single subjects were expressed as mean ± SD. Data of measurements between groups were expressed as mean ± SEM, and the Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
However, nonapneic breathing in these patients was also altered by OSA. The standard deviations of these nonapneic breaths was increased, compared to that of healthy subjects. In addition, the frequency distribution of breath-to-breath intervals of normal length was also different from that of the control subjects. The kurtosis of this distribution was significantly lower compared to that in control subjects (Fig 3 ). This is equivalent to a less-regular breathing pattern, as was obvious in the analysis of breath-to-breath intervals of a single patient over the entire duration of sleep (Fig 2 , middle, B) compared to a healthy subject (Fig 2 , left, A). Compared to the total nighttime analysis, the same decrease in kurtosis was also found in periods that were not interrupted by apneas. One example would be the breath-to-breath intervals of 3,160 to 3,560 of patient 2 (arrows in Fig 1 , top, A) with a kurtosis of - 0.32. Age did not significantly influence kurtosis within the group of OSA patients (Table 2 ).
|
|
|
|
Together with the disappearance of frequent apneas, nonapneic breathing normalized. This more regular breathing is readily visible by comparing the tachograms of breath-interval duration before (Fig 1 , top, A) and after (Fig 1 , bottom, B) CPAP therapy. CPAP treatment clearly reduced the width of the distribution around the mean duration of 3 s, resulting in a more narrow appearance of the black line (Fig 1 , bottom, B). In line with this, the standard deviations of the length of these nonapneic breaths decreased (0.83 ± 0.21), compared to the untreated state (1.13 ± 0.21; p = 0.02). The frequency distribution (Fig 2 , right, C) of breath-to-breath intervals narrowed and was no longer different from that of control subjects. This was indicated by a significant (p = 0.01) increase in kurtosis in treated vs untreated patients (Fig 3) . In addition, kurtosis of treated patients no longer differed from that of control subjects (Fig 3) .
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Breathing Pattern in Healthy Subjects
Recurring changes in the rate of breathing was noticed 35 years
ago in healthy subjects with short changes in respiratory frequency
every three to four breaths superimposed on greater and more prolonged
periodic changes.20
These nonperiodic short changes could
not be attributed solely to random fluctuations. The average length of
increase and decrease in breathing frequency, and hence the factors
controlling it, were to some extent characteristic for an individual
subject.21
This was later confirmed in identical twins,
where pattern of breathing was significantly similar within twin
pairs,22
and in another study of healthy adults, where the
unique characteristics of breathing pattern were maintained over a time
period of 4 to 5 years.23
Various mechanisms, which were previously reviewed,24 are thought to cause temporal variations in the pattern of breathing. Periodic variations were contributed to oscillations originated in chemoreflex feedback loops and to central neural memory mechanisms. Nonrandom, nonperiodic variability of respiratory pattern was attributed to nonlinear interactions between pulmonary and airway afferent activities and integrative central respiratory mechanisms.
Breath-by-breath variations decrease in non-REM sleep compared to wakefulness.25 26 27 This is in accordance with our finding in healthy subjects that the distribution of breath-to-breath intervals was narrow during non-REM sleep.
It has been reported that the inspiratory flow curve changes in patients with OSA from a regular sinusoidal shape to a more flattened shape during elevated upper-airway resistance.28 This would influence measurements of mere inspiratory time and could lead to a wider distribution of breath intervals in OSA patients compared to healthy subjects. We therefore chose to analyze total interval duration only. Analyzing total interval duration is also supported by the fact that expiratory duration is linearly dependent on inspiratory duration.29 However, there is no dependence of inspiratory duration on expiratory timing.30
Breathing Pattern in OSA Patients
The site of obstruction in OSA is thought to be the upper or lower
pharynx, where the inward collapsing action of subatmospheric
intrapharyngeal pressure during inspiration is normally prevented by an
adequate tone of the genioglossus muscle.31
In patients
with OSA, maximum pharyngeal area tends to be decreased for a variety
of reasons.32
During wakefulness, this anatomic narrowing
is compensated by increased genioglossal muscle tone. However, during
sleep the compensation is lost.33
Because these features are continuously present, they will also continuously affect breathing, although the extent may vary depending on the presence of confounding factors. After inspiratory resistive loading in healthy subjects, an increase in the scatter of inspiratory time intervals has been observed.12 Magnitude and changes in scatter depend on the extent of load. Similarly, varying degrees of upper-airway narrowing in OSA patients during sleep34 may be followed by an increase in breathing variability, as has been observed in the present study.
Our finding of an increase in breathing variability in OSA patients cannot be explained by the appearance of a few breaths of extraordinary duration in comparison to a bulk of breath intervals that were unchanged, as may be suggested by a mere increase in standard deviations. Rather, this increase in breathing variability was caused by a change in the distribution of breath-to-breath intervals with normal length because kurtosis of these intervals was reduced. In addition, the increased fluctuation in the duration of each breath was not restricted to periods immediately after apnea, where a compensatory increase in breath flow is known to occur. Periods without apneic breathing also showed a reduction of kurtosis, compared to healthy subjects.
The increased breathing variability of OSA patients was present during all sleep stages. Thus, the observed reduction in stage 3 and stage 4 sleep in OSA patients, where breathing variability is decreased in healthy subjects as well as in OSA patients, was not responsible for the increase in breathing variability in OSA patients.
An age-dependent increase in breath-to-breath variability was suggested by some authors.25 26 35 Therefore, an age-dependent difference in kurtosis between the two groups had to be excluded because the 10-year difference in mean age was statistically significant. Two factors oppose the possibility that the difference in breathing variability could be explained by age. First, within the group of patients with OSA, the younger and older patients did not differ in terms of mean kurtosis, as shown in Table 2 . Secondly, the more severely affected OSA patients, who exhibited a greater breathing variability than the less affected OSA patients, tended to be even younger than the less affected patient group. The lack of an age-dependent effect in the present study might be explained by the relatively small difference in age between the two groups, compared to previous studies where an age dependence of breathing patterns was examined. In these studies, the age difference between the study groups was much greater (approximately 40 years),25 26 35 the mean age of the younger subjects was much lower (25 to 29 years), and the mean age of the older subjects was much higher (69 to 76 years).
Compared to the considerable variability in AHI for an individual patient,36 37 38 39 there appears to be a good correlation between kurtosis and AHI in the present study. This suggests that there might be a common underlying cause for the increase in breath-to-breath variability and the increase in the severity of OSA. The link might be the increase in upper-airway resistance, because a significant increase in breathing variability was also reported during snoring episodes leading to arousals in patients without OSA.40 Increases in upper-airway resistance could thus lead to increases in breath-to-breath variability, but will finally result in apnea if a threshold value is reached.
Effective CPAP therapy did not only reduce episodes of apnea and hypopnea, but also normalized breathing variability in the present study. This normalization of breathing pattern with the onset of CPAP therapy indicates that the altered breathing pattern in OSA patients is likely because of peripheral mechanisms such as the proposed increase in respiratory resistance, rather than to primarily central effects or to an altered chemoreceptor sensitivity.
Analyzing the contour of the flow signal instead of its timing provided similar evidence for a relationship between flow limitations and changes in flow signal in a study28 of CPAP titration in OSA patients. CPAP levels entirely eliminating upper-airway resistance in this study resulted in a regularly shaped inspiratory flow signal. In contrast, a high resistance was associated with a flattened inspiratory flow signal. The change to a more flattened flow contour remained detectable at suboptimal CPAP pressure that led to a decrease in apneic events with a concomitant increase in hypopneas. In this situation, esophageal pressure remained elevated.41 A similar classification of the shape of inspiratory flow curves in 10 patients with various degrees of upper-airway resistance (ie, OSA, UARS, and snoring) also indicates a relation between upper-airway resistance and changes in breathing pattern,11 as is suggested by our observations. Additional strength is added to this interpretation by a stronger correlation of kurtosis with AHI rather than AI alone in the present study.
The greater variation in breath-to-breath interval described in this study may constitute a characteristic feature of OSA. Although a direct relation between UARS and increased breath-to-breath variability remains to be shown, we have demonstrated significantly increased breath-to-breath variability in OSA patients correlating to the extent of upper-airway obstruction as indicated by AHI. This variability resolved immediately with the onset of effective CPAP therapy. Analysis of breath-to-breath intervals might therefore prove to be a valuable diagnostic tool to assess upper-airway obstruction during sleep. It seems likely that increased resistance without overt obstruction, as is characteristic for UARS, can be detected with this technique. However, this will have to await further evaluation. In the future it may be possible to incorporate breathing variability into automated control algorithm for CPAP adjustment in order to avoid not only overt complete airway obstruction by autoadjusted CPAP, but also the increase in upper-airway resistance that might be indicated by increased breathing variability.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 12, 2000. Accepted for publication September 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Miyata, N. Burioka, T. Sako, H. Suyama, Y. Fukuoka, K. Tomita, S. Higami, and E. Shimizu A short daytime test using correlation dimension for respiratory movement in OSAHS Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 885 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |