|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the University of Nebraska Medical Center (Dr. Schram), Omaha, NE; and Good Samaritan Hospital (Drs. Vosik and Cantral), Kearney, NE.
Correspondence to: David J. Schram, MD, Via Christi St. Joseph, 1131 South Clifton, Wichita, KS 67218; e-mail: djschram{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: cervical chiropractic manipulation diaphragm paralysis phrenic nerve
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We report a case of phrenic nerve injury and diaphragmatic paralysis due to chiropractic manipulation. Five other case reports of phrenic nerve injury and resultant diaphragmatic paralysis from cervical chiropractic manipulation were found after a thorough review in MEDLINE (from 1969 to 1999).3 7 8 9 While spinal manipulation is typically accepted as a risk-free procedure by the general public, phrenic nerve injury may result and should be recognized as a potential complication to cervical manipulation.
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evaluation showed a slightly tachypneic patient with diminished breath sounds bilaterally, right more than left. In the upright position, respirations were normal. However, in the supine position, the patient immediately complained of severe dyspnea and exhibited thoracoabdominal paradoxical breathing and the use of accessory muscles of respiration. The patient did not exhibit any other abnormalities, including the results of a neurologic examination, and gave no significant medical history.
The chest radiograph demonstrated elevation of the hemidiaphragms with bilateral basilar atelectasis. There were no previous chest radiographs available for comparison. Subsequent fluoroscopy of the diaphragms demonstrated very minimal excursion of both the left and right diaphragm, with no paradoxical motion identified with the sniff test. Arterial blood gas values obtained in the sitting position at presentation were pH of 7.35; PCO2, 46 mm Hg; PO2, 60 mm Hg; and HCO3, 25.4 mEq/L. Pulmonary function tests also obtained in the sitting position showed an FVC of 1.65 L (38% of predicted), FEV1 of 1.26 (35%), and FEV1/FVC of 92% consistent with a restrictive lung process.
A cervical spine radiograph was unremarkable. CT of the chest demonstrated small lung volumes with basilar atelectasis without mediastinal or hilar masses. MRI showed bony stenosis of the right neural foramen and dural sac at C3-C4 that was not believed to be clinically significant, with no other abnormalities. Results of chemical profile, ECG, serial creatinine phosphokinase, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and echocardiogram were all normal.
The clinical and radiographic findings supported the diagnosis of bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis secondary to his recent chiropractic manipulation. The patients functional status remained unchanged for the remainder of his hospital stay. During hospitalization, he was administered nasal mechanical ventilation from 10 PM to 5 AM. Ten months after the initial injury, the patient continues to have difficulties with shortness of breath on exertion and breathing in the supine position. Further follow-up at another institution specializing in pulmonary medicine has not revealed any other diagnosis nor any improvement in his pulmonary function tests or clinical status.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chiropractic manipulation is a relatively uncommon cause of traumatic injury to the phrenic nerve, and the actual incidence is unknown. Other more commonly recognized causes include penetrating injury to the thorax or neck,12 blunt trauma to the chest,15 jugular or subclavian catheterization,16 or birth trauma.17 Compression or destruction of the phrenic nerves by cervical osteoarthritis, aortic aneurysm, substernal thyroid, and bronchogenic or mediastinal tumors may also cause diaphragmatic paralysis.10 All reported cases of diaphragmatic paralysis associated with chiropractic manipulation result from stretching or compression of the phrenic nerve by the manipulative force. In cervical strain, forced flexion or rotation of the occiput toward a fixed depressed shoulder can cause a stretch (traction) injury to the cervical plexus and result in phrenic nerve paralysis.12
Patients with diaphragmatic paralysis typically present as our patient did, with elevation of one or both hemidiaphragms, dyspnea, orthopnea, and pulmonary function tests that show a restrictive process.10 15 18 Patients symptoms with bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis universally worsen in the supine position. In the upright position, the weight of the abdominal contents tends to prevent excessive paradoxical motion and cephalad displacement of the diaphragm caused by the action of the intercostal and accessory muscles during maximal inspiration. When these patients are in the supine position, this protective mechanism is lost, and patients have a marked reduction in vital capacity.10 18
Of the five previously reported cases of diaphragmatic paralysis following chiropractic manipulation, three involved unilateral phrenic nerve injury7 9 and two involved bilateral injury.3 8 Descriptions of the manipulative maneuvers were not given. Symptoms of bilateral injury usually occur immediately after manipulation, while symptoms in unilateral paralysis develop over days to years. Our patient with bilateral paralysis did not develop symptoms immediately, but rather, several hours later.
The prognosis of bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis depends on the underlying process. When the nerve injury is not due to a progressive, generalized neuropathic disease, recovery may take place over months to years.10 12 15 Only one patient of the five published cases of phrenic nerve injury secondary to cervical manipulation was followed long enough to see a change in his condition. In 3 years, he experienced gradual improvement in his symptoms, vital capacity, and transdiaphragmatic pressures.8
Although uncommon, diaphragmatic paralysis from phrenic nerve injury can be a complication of cervical chiropractic manipulation. We publish this case and information obtained from our literature search to increase awareness of this potential complication. In all cases of idiopathic phrenic nerve paralysis, we recommend taking a careful history about previous chiropractic manipulation.
Received for publication January 31, 2000. Accepted for publication July 17, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |