Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, L.
(Chest. 2001;119:391S-396S.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Evolution and Clinical Importance of Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamases*

Louis Rice, MD

* From the Cleveland Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

Correspondence to: Louis Rice, MD, Medical Service III (w), Cleveland Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd, Cleveland, OH 44106


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 
In the process of evolution, bacteria have acquired well-developed mechanisms of resistance to an extensive array of hostile substances. This time-tempered system of defense is so intricate and adaptable that contemporary medicine has been hard-pressed to maintain an advantage. In this article, the processes responsible for bacterial resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins are reviewed. Particular emphasis is placed on the extended-spectrum ß-lactamases that have emerged to provide bacteria with formidable resistance to modern drugs. Avoidance of this problem requires limitations on extended-spectrum cephalosporin usage. While carbapenems are clearly the treatment of choice for infections caused by these pathogens, empirical use of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors such as piperacillin/tazobactam has been associated with reduction in the prevalence of cephalosporin resistance.

Key Words: bacteria • ß-lactamases • carbapenems • cephalosporin resistance • resistance, ß-lactam


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 
The evolution of bacteria through time has permitted the elaboration of a host of diverse species. These many species have generated a corresponding diversity of resistance mechanisms that fight naturally occurring antibiotic challenges, such as those generated by molds, yeasts, and actinomycetes. As a result, even bacteria that have never been exposed to commercial antibiotics can nonetheless bear resistance genes to these drugs.1 Thus, it is not surprising that the widespread clinical use of commercial antibiotics has mobilized latent mechanisms to neutralize their impact. This process has been further facilitated by the variety of genetic elements that can harbor resistance genes, including the bacterial chromosome, transferable plasmids, and transposons. Resistance is facilitated by interspecies transfer through conjugation (DNA transfer during bacterial mating), transformation (incorporation of free DNA carrying resistance genes from the environment), or transduction (transfer of genetic material between pathogenic species by bacteriophage). Gene transfer may occur across a very broad host range, such as between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.1 2

Given the above scenario, there is not only a plethora of pathogenic species that are potentially resistant to antibiotics, but the means employed to cause resistance are correspondingly varied. Each pathogen may require a specific countervailing strategy when resistant strains emerge in a clinical setting. In this discussion, we will focus on mechanisms responsible for resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae to extended-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftazidime, with particular emphasis on the extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) that have emerged with use of these drugs, mediating an increased incidence of outbreaks of resistant organisms in ICUs nationwide.3


    ß-Lactam Resistance
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 
Beginning with the introduction of penicillin half a century ago, the ß-lactams have remained the largest antibiotic class of clinical relevance, comprising four major families: the penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams.4 5 These antibiotic classes continue to be the objects of directed chemical modifications in order to modulate their antimicrobial activity (Fig 1 ).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Basic core structures of ß-lactam antibiotics. Substitutions are indicated by the R1 groups. Structural differences among these antibiotics confer differences in susceptibility to ß-lactamases. From Livermore5 with permission.

 
Three principal mechanisms cause resistance to ß-lactams6 : (1) a reduction in the affinity of the drug targets (penicillin-binding proteins) via amino-acid substitution, a phenomenon occurring in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria7 ; (2) in Gram-negative species, alteration in outer-membrane permeability that denies passage to the ß-lactams (eg, downregulation of an outer-membrane porin confers imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa)8 ; and (3) in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and of principal clinical importance for Gram-negative rods, such as K pneumoniae, the production of ß-lactamases that inactivate the drug through hydrolysis of the ß-lactam ring.7 9

ß-Lactamases are produced by a wide variety of bacteria, including aerobic Gram-positive or Gram-negative and anaerobic species. They can be encoded by genes on chromosomes or plasmids.4 6 In Gram-negative species, ß-lactamases are found in the periplasmic space, between the cell wall and the outer membrane; in Gram-positive bacteria, which lack outer membranes, they are excreted. There are many types of ß-lactamases, which vary both in their ability to inactivate a given ß-lactam as well as in their susceptibility to inhibitors such as clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam.6 ß-Lactamases are classified according to their amino-acid sequences (as presented in Table 1 )9 and by their functional characteristics as defined by their substrate and inhibitor profiles.10


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Distribution, Classification, and Expression of Important ß-Lactamases*

 
The parent enzymes of class A, particularly the TEM (named after a little girl) and sulfhydryl variable (SHV) series expressed predominantly by Escherichia coli and K pneumoniae,4 are of special interest in the generation of ESBL variants. These enzymes are plasmid encoded and thus are readily transferred to other bacteria. For the most part, they are constitutively produced, not inducible, and are penicillinases, demonstrating little activity against cephalosporins. Furthermore, they are subject to inhibition by clinically available inhibitors.

TEM enzymes can confer dramatic levels of resistance (Table 2 ). In the presence of TEM-1, which may be considered the progenitor enzyme of the TEM series, resistance to ampicillin is increased > 100-fold in E coli, whereas this enzyme is completely inactive against ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin. However, when the extended-spectrum variant TEM-26 is expressed by K pneumoniae, a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 256 mg/mL for ceftazidime follows (again, far in excess of a clinically useful concentration).11 12


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. ß-Lactamases and Resistance Levels

 
One cautionary note, however, is that in assessing the implications of such tables of MICs, the interpretations are not always straightforward; in some instances, they may be confused by the phenomenon of an inoculum effect (Table 3 ).13 Ceftazidime, by virtue of its bulk and charge, has difficulty accumulating in the periplasmic space and tends to be more readily hydrolyzed by ESBLs compared with other third-generation cephalosporins, resulting in a high MIC even at the standard inoculum of 105 cfu/mL. In the case of cefotaxime, however, the same inoculum for a TEM-26-producing strain yields an MIC of 1, within the susceptible range. Increasing the inoculum 100-fold, however, causes the cefotaxime MIC to increase more than two orders of magnitude, reflecting the fact that ESBL-producing strains will show higher in vitro resistance as the number of organisms increases. As a result, in clinical situations where there is a high local concentration of organisms, drugs with nominal MICs that are within the attainable range may nonetheless prove ineffective.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Inoculum Effects*

 

    Origin of Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamases
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 
ESBLs find their origins in genes that are already present in many bacteria. Approximately 25 to 30% of E coli, for instance, are resistant to ampicillin, in most cases as a result of their possessing a plasmid carrying the TEM-1 ß-lactamase gene.14 Similarly, one study suggests that virtually all Klebsiella species carry an SHV-1-like ß-lactamase gene on their chromosome.15 Various mechanisms, whether involving alterations in the promoter or translocation of the gene to a plasmid, can mediate high-level expression that facilitates the emergence of ESBL-producing variants.

Over the past 2 decades, many variants have in fact been generated. In 1982, when ceftazidime first became available, TEM-1, TEM-2, and SHV-1 were known; at present, we know of > 60 TEM-producing variants, most of them ESBLs, as well as at least 20 new SHVs. As shown in Table 4 , minor amino-acid substitutions in TEMs can dramatically alter their ability to confer resistance to third-generation cephalosporins.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Molecular Basis of Extended-Spectrum Activity*

 
Alterations in three positions of the TEM-1 enzyme, a protein that contains 263 amino acids, can readily generate ESBL activity. To generate TEM-12, a one-nucleotide change converts the arginine at position 162 to a serine; an additional one-nucleotide change, resulting in a glutamate-to-lysine change in position 237 or 102, yields TEM-10 or TEM-26, respectively. Consequently, the ceftazidime MICs change from the very low value associated with TEM-1 to 256 mg/mL for TEM-26, the most potent of all the ESBLs against ceftazidime. Thus, a situation arises in which essentially all Klebsiella species and one third of E coli are only one or two mutations away from elaborating ESBLs. Given the extraordinarily rapid rate of bacterial reproduction and the possibility that the enzyme coding sequence can be located on high-copy number plasmids, this results in an extremely high probability of such variants being produced in the clinical setting.

The survival of such ESBL-producing variants is strictly dependent on their being given a selective advantage. Both TEM-1 and SHV-1 have optimal structures as penicillinases,16 so that the change in specificity to a cephalosporin-resistant ESBL makes the organism somewhat less resistant to penicillins. Thus, it is only in the context of cephalosporin use that the resistant variants emerge. For any given patient, the evolution of resistance may follow a unique path, including not only TEM and SHV alterations but also interactions of these altered enzymes with other cellular components.

Table 5 shows an example of this complexity, in which alterations in membrane proteins also contribute to the development of ceftazidime resistance. The patient began with an E coli infection that was ampicillin resistant, owing to the presence of the TEM-1 gene, but was ceftazidime sensitive. Within a month, a ceftazidime-resistant strain had emerged, without the elaboration of an ESBL. Instead, resistance was effected through acquisition of a heavily expressed SHV-1 and the concomitant elimination of one of the outer-membrane porins, reducing access of the antibiotic to the periplasmic space. The combination of TEM-1 and SHV-1, each relatively inactive against ceftazidime, together with the diminished uptake of the drug, was sufficient to generate resistance. Over the next several weeks (by December 23), the SHV-1 gene had mutated to generate SHV-8, by itself sufficient to confer resistance, so that within a few days (by December 27), the bacteria had restored production of the missing membrane porin, given that its elimination was no longer required to resist ceftazidime. Presumably, its restoration would then benefit the bacteria, since membrane proteins normally would be expected to serve a variety of functions unrelated to antimicrobial transit.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Evolution of Ceftazidime-Resistant E coli in a Patient*

 

    Treatment of K pneumoniae Outbreaks
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 
The literature dealing with responses to ESBL-expressing K pneumoniae is not extensive, but from several documented accounts, a definite pattern is beginning to emerge. While there is evidence that these organisms can spread from hospital to hospital (making infection-control measures relevant to their containment), their emergence is first and foremost a response to the use of antibiotics (specifically, extended-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftazidime and ceftriaxone).17 Consequently, an essential component to the control of these outbreaks has included the reduction and even elimination of cephalosporin use and concomitant substitution with alternative drugs. While no substitute strategy has proved uniformly effective, two approaches have shown promise. The first strategy involves the use of carbapenems such as imipenem, while the second involves the combination of a ß-lactam antibiotic together with a ß-lactamase inhibitor, specifically piperacillin/tazobactam.

Owing to its resistance to hydrolysis by ESBLs, imipenem is particularly indicated when an outbreak of ESBL-producing K pneumoniae has already materialized.18 19 Ciprofloxacin has been shown to be effective when used in place of imipenem,19 but such a substitution may not be useful since it has been reported that resistance to fluoroquinolines such as ciprofloxacin can occur in a substantial fraction of ESBL strains.20 While imipenem is the most effective therapy for eliminating an outbreak of ESBL organisms, its use is also not without risks, as there have been two reported instances of nosocomial imipenem-resistance outbreaks involving Acinetobacter baumanii21 and P aeruginosa.22

As an alternative approach, we have used piperacillin/tazobactam as a substitute for ceftazidime at the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, where ceftazidime-resistant ESBL-producing K pneumoniae had increased steadily during the early 1990s.23 Although piperacillin/tazobactam is not indicated as the drug of choice to eliminate an outbreak of ESBL-containing organisms, as a significant number of species are resistant to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations,24 this drug combination has proved particularly helpful as an empiric alternative to ceftazidime for treating infections in locales where ESBL-containing organisms are known to be present and for decreasing the likelihood of new outbreaks. Over 4 years of extensive use of this combination, results have indicated not only a reduction in ESBL-producing K pneumoniae but also a reduction from 25% to 5% of piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant variants of this organism. Moreover, there has been no selection for resistant variants in other pathogens such as Pseudomonas species, despite its relatively heavy use. The incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus has also remained notably low.

While confirmation in further settings is necessary, these data taken together suggest that the use of piperacillin/tazobactam is appropriate for routine substitution of the extended-spectrum cephalosporins, whereas the carbapenems may be reserved for situations in which outbreaks of ESBL-containing organisms nonetheless materialize. In addition, it must be emphasized that returning to the use of cephalosporins is an unattractive option, as the molecular logic described in Table 4 will again impose itself, meaning that only one or two nucleotide substitutions are needed to generate another outbreak.


    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 
Dr. Joseph Lynch:
How often do plasmid-mediated resistances get transferred to other Enterobacteriaceae besides K pneumoniae? How widespread is fluoroquinolone resistance, and is it increasing?

Dr. Louis Rice:
There are many plasmids capable of being transferred. In vitro, they are readily transferred to E coli and many other species. While Klebsiella is by far the most common source, they have also been found in E coli, as well as species of Proteus, Salmonella, Serratia, and Enterobacter. The fluoroquinolone correlation appears to be getting progressively stronger as well, although it is unclear why. George Jacoby and colleagues28 recently reported on plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance on the same plasmid as the ESBL.

Dr. Ronald Jones:
We have been monitoring these problems, and over the past year have observed a major change in endemic rates of ESBLs both in North and South America. For example, one species, Proteus mirabilis, rarely showed ESBL variants before 1997. In 1998, we found a 10-fold increase in ESBL-containing strains, involving the same ESBLs formerly present in Klebsiella species and E coli. In short, once the genetic background is in place, plasmids are readily transferred between species. We observed one especially dramatic example of this in one South American institution, which imposed an infection control program that resulted in a significant reduction (from 40% to 25%) of K pneumoniae ESBL-containing strains, but as a result of an exclusive focus on this genus to the exclusion of other enteric bacilli, the frequency of the same ESBL variants in P mirabilis quadrupled. This and other institutions are now also seeing disappearance of efficacy of fourth-generation cephalosporins against Amp C enzyme-producing species, as these ESBL-containing isolates develop further levels of coresistance, some also in fluoroquinolone-resistant strains.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: ESBL = extended-spectrum ß-lactamase; MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration; SHV = sulfhydryl variable


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 {beta}-Lactam Resistance
 Origin of Extended-Spectrum...
 Treatment of K pneumoniae...
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jenkins, SG (1996) Mechanisms of bacterial antibiotic resistance. New Horiz 4,321-332[Medline]
  2. Salyers, AA, Amábile-Cuevas, CF (1997) Why are antibiotic resistance genes so resistant to elimination? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41,2321-2325[ISI][Medline]
  3. Itokazu, GS, Quinn, JP, Bell-Dixon, C, et al (1996) Antimicrobial resistance rates among aerobic gram-negative bacilli recovered from patients in intensive care units: evaluation of a national post-marketing surveillance program. Clin Infect Dis 23,779-784[ISI][Medline]
  4. Medeiros, AA (1997) Evolution and dissemination of ß-lactamases accelerated by generations of ß-lactam antibiotics. Clin Infect Dis 24(suppl 1),S19-S45
  5. Livermore, DM (1996) Are all ß-lactams created equal? Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 101,33-43[Medline]
  6. Hart, SM, Bailey, EM (1996) A practical look at the clinical usefulness of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Ann Pharmacother 30,1130-1140[Abstract]
  7. Spratt, BG (1994) Resistance to antibiotics mediated by target alterations. Science 264,388-393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Quinn, JP, Dudek, EJ, DiVincenzo, CA, et al (1986) Emergence of resistance to imipenem during therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Infect Dis 154,289-294[ISI][Medline]
  9. Ambler, RP (1980) The structure of ß-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 289,321-331[ISI][Medline]
  10. Bush, K, Jacoby, GA, Medeiros, AA (1995) A functional classification scheme for ß-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39,1211-1233[ISI][Medline]
  11. CEPTAZ® [manufacturer’s prescribing information]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Glaxo Wellcome, 1998
  12. FORTAZ® [manufacturer’s prescribing information]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Glaxo Wellcome, 1998
  13. Rice, LB, Yao, JDC, Klimm, K, et al (1991) Efficacy of different ß-lactams against an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain in the rat intra-abdominal abscess model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35,1243-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Meyn, LA, Hillier, SL (1997) Ampicillin susceptibilities of vaginal and placental isolates of Group B Streptococcus and Escherichia coli obtained between 1992 and 1994. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41,1173-1174[Abstract]
  15. Leung, M, Shannon, K, French, G (1997) Rarity of transferable ß-lactamase production by Klebsiella species. J Antimicrob Chemother 39,737-745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Jacoby, GA, Carreras, I (1990) Activities of ß-lactam antibiotics against Escherichia coli strains producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34,858-862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Monnet, DL, Biddle, JW, Edwards, JR, et al (1997) Evidence of interhospital transmission of extended-spectrum ß–lactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the United States, 1986 to 1993. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 18,492-498[ISI][Medline]
  18. Meyer, KS, Urban, C, Eagan, JA, et al (1993) Nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiella infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins. Ann Intern Med 119,353-358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bingen, EH, Desjardins, P, Guillaume, A, et al (1993) Molecular epidemiology of plasmid spread among extended broad-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in a pediatric hospital. J Clin Microbiol 31,179-184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Schiappa, DA, Hayden, MK, Matushek, MG, et al (1996) Ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli bloodstream infection: a case-control and molecular epidemiologic investigation. J Infect Dis 174,529-536[ISI][Medline]
  21. Go, ES, Urban, C, Burns, J, et al (1994) Clinical and molecular epidemiology of acinetobacter infections sensitive only to polymyxin B and sulbactam. Lancet 344,1329-1332[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Rahal, JJ, Urban, C, Horn, D, et al (1998) Class restriction of cephalosporin use to control total cephalosporin resistance in nosocomial Klebsiella. JAMA 280,1233-1237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Rice, LB, Eckstein, EC, DeVente, J, et al (1996) Ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates recovered at the Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Clin Infect Dis 23,118-124[ISI][Medline]
  24. Rice, LB, Carias, LL, Bonomo, RA, et al (1996) Molecular genetics of resistance to both ceftazidime and ß-lactam – ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations in Klebsiella pneumoniae and in vivo response to ß-lactam therapy. J Infect Dis 173,151-158[ISI][Medline]
  25. Jacoby, GA, Medeiros, AA (1991) More extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35,1697-1704[Free Full Text]
  26. Rice, LB, Marshall, SH, Carias, LL, et al (1993) Sequences of MGH-1, YOU-1, and YOU-2 extended-spectrum ß-lactamase genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37,2760-2761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rasheed, JK, Jay, C, Metchock, B, et al (1997) Evolution of extended-spectrum ß-lactam resistance (SHV-8) in a strain of Escherichia coli during multiple episodes of bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41,647-653[Abstract]
  28. Martinez-Martinez, L, Pascual, A, Jacoby, GA (1998) Quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid. Lancet 351,797-799[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Vancanneyt, M, Segers, P, Torck, U, et al (1996) Reclassification of Flavobacterium odoratum (Slutzer, 1929) strains to a new genus, Myroides, as Myroides odoratus comb. nov. and Myroides odoratimius sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46,926-932[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. M. Graffunder, K. E. Preston, A. M. Evans, and R. A. Venezia
Risk factors associated with extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase-producing organisms at a tertiary care hospital
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2005; 56(1): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS