|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pediatrics, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Correspondence to: Reiko Saga, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Gunma University School of Medicine, Showa-Machi 339-15, Maebashi, Japan 371-8511; e-mail: saga{at}akagi.sb.gunma-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intervention: Bronchial reactivity to inhaled methacholine (BRm) during the infantile period was studied using the transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (tcPO2) method. Children were followed long-term for the development of asthma.
Patients: Fourteen children with bronchiolitis (mean age, 0.7 years) and 48 with wheezy bronchitis (mean age, 2.3 years) were enrolled. For comparison, 40 children with asthma (mean age, 4.6 years) and 27 healthy control subjects without chronic respiratory disease (mean age, 2.7 years) were studied.
Measurements: Consecutive doses of methacholine were doubled until a 10% decrease in tcPO2 from baseline was reached. The cumulative dose of methacholine (Dmin) at the inflection point of tcPO2 (Dmin-PO2) was recorded.
Results: During > 10 years of follow-up, seven patients with bronchiolitis developed asthma and all patients in the higher BRm set developed asthma, compared with none in the lower BRm set. In the wheezy bronchitis group, Dmin-PO2 values in the 32 patients who developed asthma were lower than those in patients who had not developed asthma (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: We concluded that there is a tendency for infants with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis or wheezy bronchitis and who show BHR in the infantile period to develop asthma. The presence of increased BHR after infantile respiratory diseases associated with wheezing may be a prelude to the development of childhood asthma.
Key Words: bronchial hyperresponsiveness bronchiolitis infants with asthma methacholine inhalation challenge transcutaneous oxygen pressure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Viral bronchiolitis may contribute to the development of subsequent wheezing, and bronchiolitis may be an early marker of genetically determined asthma.3 4 Viral infections exacerbate BHR,5 and it is thought that persistent BHR after a first attack of asthma may be induced or triggered by viral infections.6
Thus, it would be important to evaluate whether infants with BHR more easily succumb to respiratory infections with wheezing, whether BHR is established soon after respiratory infections with wheezing, and whether BHR in wheezy infants affects the development of asthma.
To resolve these points, the measurement of BHR in the early stages of life is needed, especially because the first attack of asthma frequently occurs within the first few years of life; 80% of children develop symptoms before the age of 5 years.7 However, a useful technique for measuring BHR in infants has not been established. The measurement of age-related BHR changes during childhood is associated with problems. There is the need to correct for different body shapes and heights,8 and the standardized methacholine inhalation challenge cannot be used in younger children because they may be uncooperative during the test.
Previously, it has been demonstrated that a technique of evaluating BHR in children by monitoring the transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (tcPO2) is convenient and safe.9 10 11 Using this technique, we found a correlation between the severity of bronchial asthma and age-related change in BHR and that young infants with established asthma already demonstrate BHR.12 13
To assess the relationship between BHR and the development of asthma in wheezy infants, we performed methacholine inhalation challenges, using tcPO2 monitoring in infants with bronchiolitis and wheezy bronchitis and followed them long term to see whether they developed asthma.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 mm in a skin prick test and > 0.7 Phadebus RAST
units in the RAST. For comparison, 27 age-matched control
subjects (11 boys and 16 girls; age range, 10 months to 6 years; mean
age, 2.7 years) and 40 age-matched children with atopic asthma (25 boys
and 15 girls; age range, 2 to 6 years; mean age, 4.6 years) also
participated. This report includes previously published data on control
subjects and asthmatic subjects.13
|
The clinical diagnosis of bronchial asthma was based on a history of recurrent attacks of dyspnea with perceptible wheezing after more than a year of follow-up, plus a positive reaction to causative allergens in skin tests and/or RASTs. Age-matched control subjects had no respiratory or atopic diseases. Asthma was not found in any control subjects during > 10 years of follow-up.
We measured BHR in infants with wheezing > 1 month after their respiratory tract infection in order to avoid the influence of transient airway damage by infection. All subjects were free of upper respiratory tract infection for > 4 weeks before the start of each study; patients received no medication for at least 12 h before testing. Informed parental consent was obtained before each study. After age 16 years, all subjects with bronchiolitis or wheezy bronchitis were assessed for the development of asthma.
Methacholine Inhalation Challenge
A tcPO2 monitoring system was
used to measure the results in all subjects.9
12
The
challenge was performed in subjects during sleep in the supine position
after trichloroethyl phosphate monosodium syrup (70 mg/kg) was
administered. A mask allowing constant oxygen flow was used.
Each methacholine inhalation challenge was performed using the procedure of Takishima et al.17 Briefly, methacholine (Daiichi Kagaku Yakuhin Co; Tokyo, Japan) was serially diluted with saline solution (from 25 to 50 µg/mL) and was administered via a commercially available delivery system (Astograph; Chest Co; Tokyo, Japan). The system consisted of 12 identical nebulizers connected to a main tube and an air compressor that switched from one nebulizer to another automatically at 1-min intervals. Saline solution was used in the first nebulizer as a control. Salbutamol hemisulfate was used in the final nebulizer for the treatment of induced bronchoconstriction.
tcPO2 was measured using a monitoring system (Cutaneous PO2 Monitor 820; Roche; Basel, Switzerland). The sensor temperature was fixed at 45°C and was placed on the anterior part of the forearm of the subjects.
Methacholine doses were doubled until a 10% decrease in tcPO2 from baseline was reached. The cumulative minimal dose of methacholine (Dmin) administered at the inflection point where tcPO2 decreased linearly (Dmin-PO2) was recorded as the reactivity of tcPO2 to methacholine. This was significantly related to the change in Dmin of respiratory resistance obtained from the oscillation method in children.9 One Dmin unit was considered to be equal to 1 min of inhaling an aerosolized methacholine solution (1.0 mg/mL) during tidal breathing (Fig 1) .
|
Data Analysis
Nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis method) was
used to assess differences between groups. The Mann-Whitney
U test was used to assess differences between paired groups.
For convenience, data are expressed as mean ± SD. The logarithmic
values (log10 milliunits) of
Dmin-PO2 were used for
statistical analysis and illustrations. A p value < 0.05 was
considered to be significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean value of Dmin-PO2 in infants with bronchiolitis (8.1 ± 0.9 U) was significantly lower than that in control subjects (21.0 ± 3.9 U) (p < 0.01) and was significantly higher than that in asthmatic patients (4.35 ± 1.3 U) (p < 0.01) (Fig 2 ). Similarly, the mean value of Dmin-PO2 in infants with wheezy bronchitis (12.51 ± 2.6 U) was significantly lower than that in control subjects (p < 0.01) and was significantly higher than that in asthmatic patients (p < 0.01) (Fig 2) .
|
Unfortunately, only eight children with bronchiolitis were assessed for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Five of eight children with bronchiolitis were RSV-positive. However, there was no difference in Dmin-PO2 between RSV-positive children (n = 5) and other children with bronchiolitis(n = 9).
In the wheezy bronchitis group, 32 patients (20 boys) have developed asthma. The mean Dmin-PO2 value in these patients (12.12 ± 0.9 U) was significantly lower than that in the asthma-free group (21.0 ± 3.7 U) (p < 0.001; Fig 2 ).
The Dmin-PO2 was the same in girls and boys among patients who developed asthma and among those who did not in both the bronchiolitis group and the wheezy bronchitis group.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously evaluated BHR in infants with asthma by monitoring tcPO2. During an acute attack of asthma, tcPO2 correlates linearly to the severity of the attack. Methacholine-induced airway obstruction results in hypoxemia because the narrowing of the airways changes the local ventilation/perfusion ratio and results in a fall in arterial PO2. Although this tcPO2 change reflects the indirect caliber change, we have demonstrated that this method is simple, painless, and effort-independent with high reproducibility and, therefore, is suitable for use with infants.13 Clarke et al18 compared the fall in tcPO2 during bronchial provocation using histamine with changes in airway function measured by the squeeze technique in healthy infants and those with wheezing disorders. They found that tcPO2 was a more sensitive indicator than maximum volume of functional residual capacity.18 In a comparison of forced oscillation, auscultation, and tcPO2 in children, the tcPO2 method was the safest and most reliable method of assessing BHR.19 Van Broekhoven et al10 and Wilts et al11 similarly reported measurement of BHR using the tcPO2 method in younger children to be convenient and safe. We earlier demonstrated that a tidal breathing technique for evaluating BHR is effortless with high reproducibility and is suitable for measuring BHR in infantile asthma.13 Using this technique, we found that BHR was detectable in infants with bronchiolitis and wheezy bronchitis, and was more detectable in children who subsequently developed asthma.
It has been reported that BHR is present in very young children and that asymptomatic subjects with BHR subsequently develop asthma.20 21 These findings are consistent with the theory that infants either are born with BHR or develop it soon after birth. Our results cast doubt on the speculation that infants with BHR easily succumb to respiratory tract infections with wheezing and that BHR is established soon after respiratory tract infections with wheezing, because only half of our wheezy infants had significant BHR. However, one could speculate that wheezy infants who are born with BHR or have a congenital predisposition to acquiring BHR may evidence wheezing more readily than infants who are born without BHR or any predisposition. The incidence of BHR, which may be persistent in the long-term, in the group of wheezy infants was significantly higher than in the nonasthma group.22 23
It has been suggested that BHR in wheezy infants may be transiently acquired after respiratory tract infections.24 However, reports have suggested that transient BHR after infection lasts only 1 or 2 weeks.24 25 We measured BHR > 1 month after respiratory tract infection; thus the influence of airway damage by respiratory tract infection should not be present in our study.
It is not known whether BHR in wheezy infants affects the development of asthma. Nonspecific BHR has been suggested as a risk factor for accelerated pulmonary function decline during aging and in the development of chronic airflow obstruction.26 Previous investigations have suggested that subjects with asymptomatic BHR had a greater frequency of asthma symptoms than normoresponsive subjects.27 28 29 Another longitudinal population study showed that BHR was a more important risk factor for the development of asthma than other atopic symptoms.30
In our study, surprisingly, all of the patients in the set with higher bronchial reactivity to methacholine (BRm) in the bronchiolitis group developed asthma, compared with none of the patients in the lower BRm set. Similarly, in the wheezy bronchitis group, BRm in patients who developed asthma was significantly higher than in patients who did not. Our data indicate a relationship between BHR in wheezing disorders and the development of asthma in children, but BHR may not be necessary for the onset of wheezing. Although BHR may transiently increase in all patients with airway damage because of respiratory tract infection during the acute phase of bronchiolitis or wheezy bronchitis, we found that persistent BHR has a potent effect on the development of childhood asthma. Bronchiolitis and first attacks of asthma may be confused clinically, but in this study infants without BHR after bronchiolitis did not develop asthma. By measuring BHR in infants with wheezing, we can determine which ones are more likely to develop asthma.
Previously, we showed that BHR in infantile chronic lung disease was higher than in age-matched control subjects.31 We believe that long-term assisted ventilation and supplemental oxygen may cause irreversible damage to the airway mucosa in neonates whose airway epithelium is immature, resulting in increased reactivity in airway smooth muscle, epithelium, and glands to inhaled methacholine. This may cause ventilation-perfusion disturbances and/or airway obstruction and may be related to acquired BHR. These data support the theory that BHR in children whose airways were damaged as infants is accentuated and persistent. An association between asthma and BHR has been demonstrated,32 and it has been suggested that airway epithelial damage causes an increase in BHR in asthmatic patients.33 However, the mechanism that establishes and maintains BHR after respiratory tract infections or infantile chronic lung diseases may be different from that in atopic asthma, just as the course and/or severity of symptoms differ in asthma induced by infantile respiratory disorders vs atopic asthma.
Our results suggest that children with BHR and a history of bronchiolitis or wheezy bronchitis have a significant likelihood of developing asthma, and that it is useful to measure BHR as a predictor of asthma development. Although our patients were divided into bronchiolitis and wheezy bronchitis, based on clinical symptoms, there is likely to be considerable overlap in these two patient groups and, without definitive RSV positivity, it is likely that there is a crossover in the etiology of the wheezing in the children classified as having bronchiolitis or wheezy bronchitis. However, we cannot define the precise mechanisms by which BHR persists in children with asthma induced by infantile respiratory diseases. Further investigation is required.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication December 22, 1999. Accepted for publication September 25, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Bentur, R. Beck, D. Berkowitz, J. Hasanin, I. Berger, N. Elias, and N. Gavriely Adenosine Bronchial Provocation With Computerized Wheeze Detection in Young Infants With Prolonged Cough: Correlation With Long-term Follow-up Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1060 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S W Turner, S Young, L I Landau, and P N Le Souef Reduced lung function both before bronchiolitis and at 11 years Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2002; 87(5): 417 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Stillwell Infant's Airway Responsiveness Predicts Asthma at 6 Years of Age AAP Grand Rounds, July 1, 2001; 6(1): 9 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |