|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine (Drs. Chen and Krewski) and Department of Medicine (Dr. Dales), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to: Yue Chen, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5; e-mail: chen{at}zeus.med.uottawa.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We examined the data on 17,601 Canadians who were
12 years of age to explore the combined effects of asthma and other
factors on hospitalization within the context of a publicly funded
health-care system. Asthma was determined by an affirmative response to
the question: "Do you have asthma diagnosed by a health
professional?" The subjects also were asked whether they had been an
overnight patient in a hospital during the past 12 months.
Results: Asthma as a risk factor explained 3.7% of all hospitalizations of men and 2.4% of all hospitalizations of women. Overall, hospitalization was positively associated with female gender, old age, and low household income. The odds ratio for asthma as a risk factor for overall hospitalization (ie, hospitalization for any reason and all causes, not only for asthma) was greater for younger men than for older men, for less-educated women than for well-educated women, and for men with middle or high incomes than for men with low incomes.
Conclusions: These results suggest that demographic and socioeconomic factors play a role in the relationship between asthma and the overall number of hospitalizations, with certain population subgroups being at greater risk of hospitalization in relation to asthma.
Key Words: asthma hospitalization socioeconomic and demographic factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Socioeconomic and demographic factors are important determinants of health.5 Studies in the United States have found that low income is associated with an increased prevalence of asthma, as well as with increased hospitalization and mortality rates.6 7 8 Low-income Americans are more likely to be uninsured, which may limit the quality of care that they receive. Although Canada has a publicly funded health-care system that may modify the influence of socioeconomic status on hospital admis-sions, this issue has not been well-studied in this country. There is some evidence that low income is a risk factor for emergency department utilization. Brown and Goel9 reported higher emergency department utilization in Ontario, Canada, among low-income individuals, young adults, and children of single parents. Also in Ontario, those people with less education and employment were more likely to make multiple (at least three) emergency department visits for asthma.10 Although socioeconomic and demographic factors are important determinants of health,5 the modifying effects of education and income on the influence of asthma on overall hospital admissions have not been well-documented. The purpose of the present analysis is to examine the impact of asthma in conjunction with age, gender, education, and income on overall hospitalization (ie, hospitalization for any reason and all causes, not only for asthma) in a large representative sample of the Canadian population.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects were asked whether they had been an overnight patient in a
hospital during the past 12 months. The cause of the hospitalization
was not available. Respondents who answered the following question
affirmatively were considered as having asthma: "Do you have asthma
diagnosed by a health professional?" Subjects were grouped into two
education categories. Subjects in the low-education category did not
proceed beyond secondary school. The high-education category included
subjects admitted to college or university and those with a
post-secondary school certificate or diploma. Subjects were classified
into low-income, middle-income, and high-income groups based on total
household income adjusted for the number of household
members.1
Current smokers were respondents who reported
smoking cigarettes regularly at the time of the survey. Ex-smokers were
those who reported smoking cigarettes daily in the past but were not
smoking at the time of the survey. Otherwise, subjects were classified
as nonsmokers. A positive history of allergy was indicated if an
affirmative response was given to either of the following questions:
"Do you have any food allergies diagnosed by a health
professional?"; or "Do you have other allergies diagnosed by a
health professional?" Body mass index was calculated from the
equation, weight (kg)/height (m)2, with
classifications of < 20.0, 20.0 to 24.9, 25.0 to 27.9, and
28.0.
Other variables included in the analysis were age (age categories, 12
to 24 years, 25 to 39 years, 40 to 54 years, 55 to 69 years, or
70
years), immigrant status (yes or no), size of household (1, 2, 3, or
4 people), number of bedrooms (< 3,
3), any pets at home (yes
or no), regular drinking (yes or no), and regular exercise (yes or no).
The relationship between asthma and overall hospitalization was examined among men and women separately. We calculated the 1-year cumulative incidence of overall hospitalization and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to various risk factors. Weighted logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between asthma and the cumulative incidence of overall hospitalization after adjustment for relevant covariates. Model parameters were estimated by the method of maximum likelihood, and the Wald statistic was used to test the significance of individual variables or interaction terms in relation to overall hospitalization.
Because the data from the NPHS from 1994 to 1995 were based on a complex survey design incorporating stratification, multiple stages of selection, and unequal probabilities of selection for respondents, standard statistical methods may not be appropriate for the analysis of these data. The NPHS microdata documentation provides guidelines stating that the population sample weights (expansion weights) must be used to produce correct population estimates.1 11 This weighting takes into account patterns of missing data and oversampling of some strata.
The effect of the complex survey design on variance estimates is summarized as a design effect (DEF). This DEF is the ratio of the estimated variance, taking into account the nature of the survey design, to a comparable estimate of variance based on a simple random sample of the target population.12 13 In the present analysis, SEs were inflated by the average DEF in order to take into account the complexities of the survey design.
We used an approximate method for incorporating the DEF.1 First, the individual weights were divided by the average weight for all subjects in the survey. The sum of these relative weights is the effective sample size. Next, we divided the relative weights by the square root of an average DEF based on the average sampling variability for the survey variables of interest. These analytic weights take into account both the survey design and the imputation of missing responses.
The population attributable risk (or attributable fraction)14 was estimated for the cumulative incidence of overall hospitalization in relation to asthma, weighted to the demographic characteristics of the Canadian population. All statistical analyses were performed using computer software (SAS, version 6.12 for Unix; SAS Institute; Cary, NC).15
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 years of age, but was
greater for women than for men in the younger age groups. Ex-smokers
and smokers demonstrated increased hospitalization compared with
nonsmokers for both genders. Overall hospitalization was positively
associated with a history of allergy in women.
|
A multiple logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of asthma on overall hospitalization after controlling for the effects of other variables. In addition to asthma, the logistic regression models included age, size of household, number of bedrooms, income, education, smoking, and alcohol drinking. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for asthma as a risk factor for overall hospitalization was 1.73 for men (95% CI, 1.19 to 2.51) and 1.52 for women (95% CI, 1.14 to 2.02). The population-attributable risk was estimated to be 3.7% for men and 2.4% for women.
Table 2
shows the unadjusted 1-year cumulative incidence of overall
hospitalization by asthmatic status and other subject characteristics
including age, education, and household income. Asthma seemed to have a
greater effect on hospitalization in male children and young adults
compared with male adults
25 years of age, in less-educated
subjects compared with well- educated subjects, and in male subjects
from middle-income families and female subjects from low-income
families compared with their counterparts from high-income families.
|
Table 3 presents the OR for asthma by age, education, and household income. The OR was greater for younger subjects than for older subjects among men, but no such age effect was seen in women. Less-educated subjects tended to have a higher OR than did well-educated individuals. (This may be partly because of the age effect, because children would not yet have had an opportunity for higher education.) When we excluded subjects < 20 years of age, the OR for asthma as a risk factor for total hospitalization was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.53) for less-educated men compared with 1.37 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.83) for well-educated men. For women, the corresponding ORs were 1.61 (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.46) and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.94), respectively. A significant association between asthma and overall hospitalization was noted in men from middle-income or high-income families, but not in men from low-income families. The ORs were similar across the income strata in women.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12 years of age. It is comparable
to an estimate based on > 11 million hospital morbidity records
during a 3-year period (1994 to 1997; unpublished data) that 2.7% of
total hospital admissions were because of asthma and related
conditions. The following individual indicators of socioeconomic and
demographic status increased the risk of overall hospitalization: older
age; female gender; and income. It seems obvious that pregnancy is a
major reason for hospitalization for young women. We considered these
variables as potential effect modifiers or confounders for the
influence of asthma on overall hospitalization in this analysis.
In the present analysis, we found that men < 25 years of age had a
higher OR for asthma as a risk factor for overall hospitalization than
did men
25 years of age. The OR in women was similar in these two
age groups. A previous study demonstrated that adult women were twice
as likely to be hospitalized as men, despite having 12% better peak
flow rates when expressed as a percentage of normal reference
values.16
In this study, however, the
population-attributable risk was lower for women than for men.
Our current results suggest that income is a risk factor for overall hospitalization, despite the fact that in Canada there is a publicly funded health-care system. This system, however, does not include medications for those < 65 years of age who are not on disability or receiving welfare benefits. Other studies have demonstrated that low income is related to the occurrence of asthma1 and to asthma hospitalization and mortality.6 8 17 18 19 The present analysis suggests that income modifies the effect of a diagnosis of asthma on overall hospitalization in men. The relationship tended to be more pronounced in the middle-income and high-income groups than in the low-income group. This difference may be because of a relatively high incidence of overall hospitalization in low-income men who were not asthmatic.
Although the socially disadvantaged experience higher morbidity from asthma, there is little information on the independent effect of education. Less education is strongly associated with both lower income and ethnicity, and these independent effects are not often isolated. The cumulative incidence of overall hospitalizations was higher in less-educated men than in well-educated men but was not associated with educational attainment in women. However, educational status modified the impact of asthma on overall hospitalization. In men, the modifying effect of education may be because of the age effect. When we excluded youths < 20 years of age, the OR for asthma as a risk factor for overall hospitalization was similar for less-educated men and well-educated men. For women, however, the OR was significantly elevated for less-educated individuals but not for well-educated ones.
Although a low level of education may be related to an increased asthma hospitalization rate,17 such an increase may or may not be explained by an increased risk of asthma. Our previous analysis has indicated that a low level of education is not associated with an increased prevalence of asthma among the Canadian population,1 although it is not known whether a low level of education increases the incidence rate or severity of asthma attacks. Education may affect the quality of both primary prevention (eg, environmental conditions) and secondary prevention (eg, primary care such as medication use). Apter et al20 reported that < 12 years of education was associated with poor adherence to asthma medication, as measured by an electronic dose counter on the corticosteroid inhaler, that was independent of income and minority status. This suggests that less education may increase overall hospitalization in subjects with asthma through inadequate control of asthma by medication.
The modifying effect of education on the relationship between asthma and overall hospitalization in women cannot be explained by household income. Socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals may have a relatively poor living environment, which may increase the incidence of asthma and the occurrence of acute severe asthma exacerbation. Unlike education, however, low household income did not increase the influence of asthma on overall hospitalization in this population. The relationship between asthma and overall hospitalization was consistent across the income strata in women. These findings suggest that the modification of education on the relationship between asthma and overall hospitalization in women is not income-related.
Although the present analysis was based on the data from a cross-sectional survey, the causal linkage between asthma and overall hospitalization seems unquestionable. Hospitalization can be a consequence of asthma, while the converse has a minimal possibility, such as by increased medical contact because of a hospitalization leading to a diagnosis of asthma. Admission to a hospital is a major event, and recall bias would be minimal for questioning such an event during a 12-month period. Asthma may be underdiagnosed, but the reporting bias of ever having asthma is small.21 The major limitation of this study is lack of information on the reasons for hospitalization. It would be interesting to know the differences in relation to social factors for asthma as a primary cause and a secondary cause in the prediction of hospitalization.
In summary, asthma as a risk factor explained approximately 3% of overall hospitalization among the Canadian population. The impact of asthma on hospitalization tended to be stronger in younger men than in older men but was similar in women. Asthma was significantly associated with an increased incidence of overall hospitalization in less-educated women only. We speculate that asthmatics with low educational attainment may have a compromised quality of primary and secondary prevention of asthma attacks. Understanding how specific socioeconomic and demographic factors influence diseases such as asthma is a necessary first step toward designing social programs to reduce morbidity. Our results, together with those from previous studies, suggest that demographic and socioeconomic factors influence the impact of asthma on overall hospitalization, which varies apparently among different population subgroups. Because Canadians are provided relatively equal access to health care, these differences related to social factors are less likely to be caused by the quality of health care.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by National Health Research and Development Program grant 660606-1998/2640023. Dr. Chen is a Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada/National Health Research and Development Program Investigator Award recipient.
Received for publication June 27, 2000. Accepted for publication October 11, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Singleton, R. C. Holman, N. Cobb, A. T. Curns, and E. L. Paisano Asthma Hospitalizations Among American Indian and Alaska Native People and for the General US Population. Chest, November 1, 2006; 130(5): 1554 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Lynd, A. J. Sandford, E. M. Kelly, P. D. Pare, T. R. Bai, J. M. FitzGerald, and A. H. Anis Reconcilable Differences: A Cross-sectional Study of the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and the Magnitude of Short-Acting {beta}-Agonist Use in Asthma Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1161 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Filleul, I. Harrabi, A. Braga, M. C. Martins, L. A. Pereira, and M. A Martins Do socioeconomic conditions reflect a high exposure to air pollution or more sensitive health conditions? J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2004; 58(9): 802 - 802. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Nonmedical Factors Influence Asthma Admissions Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, May 16, 2001; 2001(516): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |